Met expression is an independent prognostic risk factor in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with propensity for early lymphatic and haematogenous dissemination. Since conventional TNM staging does not provide accurate prognostic information, novel molecular prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets are subject of intense research. The aim of the present study was to study the prognostic significance of Met, the hepatic growth factor ( HGF) receptor and a possible target for therapy in comparison to cyclooxygenase- 2 ( COX- 2). Tumour sections from 145 consecutive patients undergoing intentionally curative surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma were immunohistochemically analysed for Met and COX- 2 expression. Clinicopathological data were prospectively collected for all patients. Patients with high Met expression had significantly reduced overall and disease- specific 5- year survival rates ( P <= 0.001 and P <= 0.001, respectively) and were more likely to develop distant metastases ( P = 0.002) and local recurrences ( P =0.004) compared to patients with low Met expression. High COX- 2 expression tended to be correlated with poor long- term survival but this did not reach statistical significance. Expression of Met was recognised as a significant and independent prognostic factor by stage- specific analysis and multivariate analysis ( relative risk 2.3; 95% CI 1.3 - 4.1). These findings support the importance of Met in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and support the concept of Met tyrosine kinase inhibition as ( neo-) adjuvant treatment

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS)

textabstractBackground. A surgical resection is currently the preferred treatment for esophageal cancer if the tumor is considered to be resectable without evidence of distant metastases (cT1-3 N0-1 M0). A high percentage of irradical resections is reported in studies using neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone and in trials in which patients are treated with surgery alone. Improvement of locoregional control by using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might therefore improve the prognosis in these patients. We previously reported that after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with weekly administrations of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel combined with concurrent radiotherapy nearly always a complete R0-resection could be performed. The concept that this neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen improves overall survival has, however, to be proven in a randomized phase III trial. Methods/design. The CROSS trial is a multicenter, randomized phase III, clinical trial. The study compares neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer, with inclusion of 175 patients per arm. The objectives of the CROSS trial are to compare median survival rates and quality of life (before, during and after treatment), pathological responses, progression free survival, the number of R0 resections, treatment toxicity and costs between patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone for surgically resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Over a 5 week period concurrent chemoradiotherapy will be applied on an outpatient basis. Paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) and Carboplatin (Area-Under-Curve = 2) are administered by i.v. infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. External beam radiation with a total dose of 41.4 Gy is given in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 fractions a week. After completion of the protocol, patients will be followed up every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months for the second year, and then at the end of each year until 5 years after treatment. Quality of life questionnaires will be filled out during the first year of follow-up. Discussion. This study will contribute to the evidence on any benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal cancer patients using a promising chemoradiotherapy regimen. Trial registration. ISRCTN80832026

Concerns about anti-angiogenic treatment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

BACKGROUND: The relevance of angiogenesis inhibition in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) should be considered in the unique context of malignant brain tumours. Although patients benefit greatly from reduced cerebral oedema and intracranial pressure, this important clinical improvement on its own may not be considered as an anti-tumour effect. DISCUSSION: GBM can be roughly separated into an angiogenic component, and an invasive or migratory component. Although this latter component seems inert to anti-angiogenic therapy, it is of major importance for disease progression and survival. We reviewed all relevant literature. Published data support that clinical symptoms are tempered by anti-angiogenic treatment, but that tumour invasion continues. Unfortunately, current imaging modalities are affected by anti-angiogenic treatment too, making it even harder to define tumour margins. To illustrate this we present MRI, biopsy and autopsy specimens from bevacizumab-treated patients. Moreover, while treatment of other tumour types may be improved by combining chemotherapy with anti-angiogenic drugs, inhibiting angiogenesis in GBM may antagonise the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs by normalising the blood-brain barrier function. SUMMARY: Although angiogenesis inhibition is of considerable value for symptom reduction in GBM patients, lack of proof of a true anti-tumour effect raises concerns about the place of this type of therapy in the treatment of GBM

In vivo use of Campath-1G to prevent graft-versus-host disease and graft rejection after bone marrow transplantation.

Twenty-two patients (16 male, six female; median age 34 years, range 16-49) with acute myeloid leukemia (1st complete remission (CR), n = 9), acute lymphocytic leukemia (1st CR, n = 5), chronic myeloid leukemia (chronic phase n = 5, accelerated phase n = 1), malignant lymphoma (n = 1) and myeloma (n = 1) were transplanted with unmanipulated donor bone marrow after standard conditioning including the monoclonal antibody Campath-1G daily from day -4 to day 0. No further graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was given. All patients engrafted and neither graft failure nor rejection were observed. Acute GVHD grade I (skin) was seen in 12 out of 21 patients at risk. Acute GVHD grade II (skin) occurred in two patients. Severe GVHD (grade III, IV) of the gut, liver and skin developed in two patients. The overall incidence of severe acute GVHD (II-IV) was 19% of the patients at risk. Chronic GVHD (skin only) was seen in eight patients (42%) (six of extensive severity). A total of 14 patients died, the causes being relapse (four), direct cytotoxic drug toxicity (one), a GVHD (two), disseminated varicella zoster (one), systemic tuberculosis (one), interstitial pneumonitis (three) and veno-occlusive disease (two). These results indicate that the intravenous administration of Campath-1G may have reduced the incidence of severe acute GVHD without the occurrence of graft failure. However, the incidence of chronic GVHD does not appear to have decreased

Richtlijn 'diagnostiek en behandeling oesofaguscarcinoom'

An evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal carcinoma was developed on the initiative of the Netherlands Society of Gastroenterohepatology in cooperation with the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement (CBO) and the Dutch Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres. If a patient with oesophageal carcinoma is eligible for treatment with curative intent, they should undergo thoracic and abdominal CT, ultrasound investigation of the supraclavicular region and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging purposes. Endoscopic therapy is the preferred treatment for high-grade dysplasia or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus confined to the mucosa. Surgical resection is indicated if the tumour invades the submucosa. If resection of the oesophageal carcinoma is performed with curative intent, one should aim for radical resection. The type and extent of the resection depends on the location of the tumour. There is evidence that the mortality rate following surgery can be reduced by performing it in centres with ample experience with oesophageal cancer surgery. Preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy may improve survival in patients with oesophageal carcinoma. Palliative treatment for oesophageal carcinoma should be considered in cases of local invasion of surrounding organs, metastases, poor physical condition of the patient or recurrent disease after previous curative treatment. Psychosocial support is an important element in the follow-up of patients with oesophageal carcinom

Improved survival of colon cancer due to improved treatment and detection: a nationwide population-based study in The Netherlands 1989-2006

Background: We described changes in treatment of colon cancer over time and the impact on survival in The Netherlands in the period 1989-2006. Patients and methods: All 103 744 patients with invasive colon cancer during 1989-2006 in The Netherlands were included. Data were extracted from The Netherlands Cancer Registry. Trends in treatment over time were analysed and multivariable relative survival analysis was carried out. Results: The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III patients = 75 years. Among stage IV patients, resection rates of the primary tumour decreased from 72% to 63%, while chemotherapy administration increased from 23% to 64% in those <75 years. Survival increased from 52% to 58% in males and from 55% to 58% among females. Stage III patients with adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a relative excess risk of 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.4-0.4) compared with those without. Among stage IV patients, resection of primary tumour, palliative chemotherapy, and metastasectomy were important prognostic factors. Conclusions: There were substantial improvements in management and survival of colon cancer from 1989 to 2006. Stage III disease patients with colon cancer experienced the largest improvement in survival, most likely related to the increased administration of adjuvant chemotherapy