135 research outputs found

    For Jack, Passionate and Compassionate Mover of the Moon

    Get PDF

    Facing the Unborn

    Get PDF
    (excerpt) An ultrasound video of an unborn child sucking its thumb makes a case against abortion that reason hardly need supplement. But a zygote photographed just after an in vitro conception is not so easily recognizable as a human being or person. Pro-lifers often assume that this difficulty has been overcome by modern science. Since the 1820s, when evidence of ovular fertilization first became known, it has been clear that the life of a human being runs from conception to death

    Thoughts on the German Constitutional Court Decision on the ESM

    Get PDF

    On the Preservation of Morality

    Get PDF

    Abortion as Betrayal

    Get PDF
    Abortion is worse than ordinary murder, principally because it involves the betrayal of a dependent by a natural guardian. Furthermore, abortion is emblematic of wider lethal betrayals of radically dependent persons. All these betrayals are rationalized precisely by the victims’ lack of autonomy-based dignity. Christianity counters by affirming the concern and respect due to those who helplessly suffer worldly disdain

    Introduction to Roscoe Pound\u27s, The Case for Law

    Get PDF

    On the Legal Validation of Sexual Relationships

    Get PDF

    Punishment, Invalidation, and Nonvalidation: What H.L.A. Hart Did Not Explain

    Get PDF
    Elaborating first upon H. L. A. Hart\u27s distinction between imposing duties and imposing disabilities, this article explores the two senses mentioned (but not fully explained) by Hart in which power-holders may be legally disabled. Legal invalidation (nullification) of norms that have been generated by vulnerable power-holders is seen to reduce diversity or pluralism in every normative sphere, from the supranational to the intrafamilial. By contrast, mere legal nonvalidation (noncognizance) of such norms tends to preserve the autonomy of the power-holders that created the norms, thus enhancing legal pluralism. Punishment for creating forbidden norms amounts in principle to an in-between sort of control, less restrictive than completely invalidating them but more restrictive than just not validating them, that is, just ignoring them. Illustrative examples include the European Court of Justice\u27s early use of invalidation to convert an international treaty into a supranational constitution, and the subtle effects of legal nonvalidation of same-sex marriage
    corecore