"It's All COVID's Fault!": Symptoms of Distress among Workers in an Italian General Hospital during the Pandemic

Background: Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) have been faced with specific stressors endangering their physical and mental health and their functioning. This study aimed to assess the short-term psychological health of a sample of Italian HCWs and the related influencing factors. In particular, the study focused on the differences related to HCWs' gender and to having been directly in charge of COVID-19 patients or not. Methods: An online survey was administered to the whole staff of the Modena General University Hospital three months after the onset of the pandemic, in 2020. Demographic data and changes in working and living conditions related to COVID-19 were collected; mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). Results: 1172 out of 4788 members returned the survey (response rate = 24.5%), the male/female ratio was 30/70%. Clinically significant symptoms assessed according to the DASS-21 emerged among 21.0% of the respondents for depression, 22.5% for anxiety and 27.0% for stress. Symptoms suggestive of a traumatic reaction were reported by 19.0% of the sample. Symptoms of psychological distress were statistically associated with female gender, job role, ward, changes in lifestyle, whereas first-line work with COVID-19 patients was statistically associated with more stress symptoms. HCWs reported a significant level of psychological distress that could reach severe clinical significance and impact dramatically their quality of life and functioning. Conclusions: Considering the persistence of the international emergency, effective strategies to anticipate, recognize and address distress in HCWs are essential, also because they may impact the organization and effectiveness of healthcare systems

Effectiveness of patients’ involvement in a medical and nursing pain education programme: a protocol for an open-label randomised controlled trial including qualitative data

Introduction Pain is a multidimensional experience that varies among individuals and has a significant impact on their health. A biopsychosocial approach is recommended for effective pain management; however, health professionals’ education is weak on this issue. Patient involvement is a promising didactic methodology in developing a more holistic perspective, however there is a lack of reliable evidence on this topic. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of patient involvement in pain education in undergraduate medicine and nursing students. Methods and analysis An open-label randomised controlled trial including qualitative data will be conducted. After an introductory lesson, each student will be randomly assigned to the intervention group, which includes an educational session conducted by a patient–partner along with an educator, or to the control group in which the session is exclusively conducted by an educator. Both sessions will be carried out according to the Case-Based Learning approach. Primary outcomes will be students’ knowledge, attitudes, opinions and beliefs about pain management, whereas the secondary outcome will be students’ satisfaction. The Pain Knowledge and Attitudes (PAK) and Chronic Pain Myth Scale (CPMS) will be administered preintervention and postintervention to measure primary outcomes. Students’ satisfaction will be measured by a questionnaire at the end of the session. Two focus groups will be conducted to evaluate non-quantifiable aspects of learning. Ethics and dissemination The protocol of this study was approved by the independent Area Vasta Emilia Nord ethics committee

Escherichia coli Is Overtaking Group B Streptococcus in Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis

The widespread use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) to prevent group B streptococcus (GBS) early-onset sepsis (EOS) is changing the epidemiology of EOS. Italian prospective area-based surveillance data (from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020) were used, from which we identified 64 cases of culture-proven EOS (E. coli, n = 39; GBS, n = 25) among 159,898 live births (annual incidence rates of 0.24 and 0.16 per 1000, respectively). Approximately 10% of E. coli isolates were resistant to both gentamicin and ampicillin. Five neonates died; among them, four were born very pre-term (E. coli, n = 3; GBS, n = 1) and one was born full-term (E. coli, n = 1). After adjustment for gestational age, IAP-exposed neonates had ≥95% lower risk of death, as compared to IAP-unexposed neonates, both in the whole cohort (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.70; p = 0.03) and in the E. coli EOS cohort (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00-0.88; p = 0.04). In multi-variable logistic regression analysis, IAP was inversely associated with severe disease (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.76; p = 0.03). E. coli is now the leading pathogen in neonatal EOS, and its incidence is close to that of GBS in full-term neonates. IAP reduces the risk of severe disease and death. Importantly, approximately 10% of E. coli isolates causing EOS were found to be resistant to typical first-line antibiotics

Impact of Nutritional Status on Postoperative Outcomes in Cancer Patients following Elective Pancreatic Surgery

Background: Pancreatic surgery has been associated with important postoperative morbidity, mortality and prolonged length of hospital stay. In pancreatic surgery, the effect of poor preoperative nutritional status and muscle wasting on postsurgery clinical outcomes still remains unclear and controversial. Materials and Methods: A total of 103 consecutive patients with histologically proven carcinoma undergoing elective pancreatic surgery from June 2015 through to July 2020 were included and retrospectively studied. A multidimensional nutritional assessment was performed before elective surgery as required by the local clinical pathway. Clinical and nutritional data were collected in a medical database at diagnosis and after surgery. Results: In the multivariable analysis, body mass index (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04–1.59, p = 0.039) and weight loss (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06–1.29, p = 0.004) were associated with Clavien score I–II; weight loss (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02–1.27, p = 0.027) affected postsurgery morbidity/mortality, and reduced muscle mass was identified as an independent, prognostic factor for postsurgery digestive hemorrhages (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 0.72, p = 0.03) and Clavien score I–II (OR 7.43, 95% CI 1.53–44.88, p = 0.018). No association was identified between nutritional status parameters before surgery and length of hospital stay, 30 days reintervention, 30 days readmission, pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, Clavien score III–IV, Clavien score V and delayed gastric emptying. Conclusions: An impaired nutritional status before pancreatic surgery affects many postoperative outcomes. Assessment of nutritional status should be part of routine preoperative procedures in order to achieve early and appropriate nutritional support in pancreatic cancer patients. Further studies are needed to better understand the effect of preoperative nutritional therapy on short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic elective surgery

Late-Onset Sepsis Mortality among Preterm Infants: Beyond Time to First Antibiotics

Objective: To investigate the impact of timing, in vitro activity and appropriateness of empirical antimicrobials on the outcome of late-onset sepsis among preterm very low birth weight infants that are at high risk of developing meningitis. Study design: This retrospective study included 83 LOS episodes in 73 very low birth weight infants born at ≤32 weeks’ gestation with positive blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture or polymerase chain reaction at >72 h of age. To define the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobials we considered both their in vitro activity and their ideal delivery through the blood-brain barrier when meningitis was confirmed or not ruled out through a lumbar puncture. The primary outcome was sepsis-related mortality. The secondary outcome was the development of brain lesions. Timing, in vitro activity and appropriateness of empirical antimicrobials, were compared between fatal and non-fatal episodes. Uni- and multi-variable analyses were carried out for the primary outcome. Results: Time to antibiotics and in vitro activity of empirical antimicrobials were similar between fatal and non-fatal cases. By contrast, empirical antimicrobials were appropriate in a lower proportion of fatal episodes of late-onset sepsis (4/17, 24%) compared to non-fatal episodes (39/66, 59%). After adjusting for Gram-negative vs. Gram-positive pathogen and for other supportive measures (time to volume administration), inappropriate empirical antimicrobials remained associated with mortality (aOR, 10.3; 95% CI, 1.4–76.8, p = 0.023), while timing to first antibiotics was not (aOR 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7–1.2, p = 0.408; AUC = 0.88). The association between appropriate antimicrobials and brain sequelae was also significant (p = 0.024). Conclusions: The risk of sepsis-related mortality and brain sequelae in preterm very low birth weight infants is significantly associated with the appropriateness (rather than the timing and the in vitro activity) of empirical antimicrobials. Until meningitis is ruled out through lumbar puncture, septic very low birth weight infants at high risk of mortality should receive empiric antimicrobials with high delivery through the blood-brain barrier

Late-Onset Sepsis Mortality among Preterm Infants: Beyond Time to First Antibiotics

Objective: To investigate the impact of timing, in vitro activity and appropriateness of empirical antimicrobials on the outcome of late-onset sepsis among preterm very low birth weight infants that are at high risk of developing meningitis. Study design: This retrospective study included 83 LOS episodes in 73 very low birth weight infants born at ≤32 weeks’ gestation with positive blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture or polymerase chain reaction at >72 h of age. To define the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobials we considered both their in vitro activity and their ideal delivery through the blood-brain barrier when meningitis was confirmed or not ruled out through a lumbar puncture. The primary outcome was sepsis-related mortality. The secondary outcome was the development of brain lesions. Timing, in vitro activity and appropriateness of empirical antimicrobials, were compared between fatal and non-fatal episodes. Uni- and multi-variable analyses were carried out for the primary outcome. Results: Time to antibiotics and in vitro activity of empirical antimicrobials were similar between fatal and non-fatal cases. By contrast, empirical antimicrobials were appropriate in a lower proportion of fatal episodes of late-onset sepsis (4/17, 24%) compared to non-fatal episodes (39/66, 59%). After adjusting for Gram-negative vs. Gram-positive pathogen and for other supportive measures (time to volume administration), inappropriate empirical antimicrobials remained associated with mortality (aOR, 10.3; 95% CI, 1.4–76.8, p = 0.023), while timing to first antibiotics was not (aOR 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7–1.2, p = 0.408; AUC = 0.88). The association between appropriate antimicrobials and brain sequelae was also significant (p = 0.024). Conclusions: The risk of sepsis-related mortality and brain sequelae in preterm very low birth weight infants is significantly associated with the appropriateness (rather than the timing and the in vitro activity) of empirical antimicrobials. Until meningitis is ruled out through lumbar puncture, septic very low birth weight infants at high risk of mortality should receive empiric antimicrobials with high delivery through the blood-brain barrier