20 research outputs found
Enhancement of fluoride release from glass ionomer cement following a coating of silver fluoride
The document attached has been archived with permission from the Australian Dental Association. An external link to the publisher’s copy is included.BACKGROUND: This study investigated the extent to which a coating of 10% silver fluoride (AgF) on discs of glass jonomer cements (GIGs) would enhance the release of fluoride ion into eluting solutions at varying pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty discs each of Fuji LX, Fuji VII and of Vitrebond were prepared in a plastic mould. Twenty discs of each material were coated for 30 seconds with a 10% solution of AgF. Five discs each of coated and uncoated material were placed individually in 4m1 of differing eluant solutions. The eluant solutions comprised deionized distilled water (DDW) and three separate acetate buffered solutions at pH 7, pH 5 and pH 3. After 30 minutes the discs were removed and placed in five vials containing 4m1 of the various solutions for a further 30 minutes. This was repeated for further intervals of time up to 216 hours, and all eluant solutions were stored. Fluoride concentrations in the eluant solutions were estimated using a fluoride specific electrode, with TISAB IV as a metal ion complexing and ionic concentration adjustment agent. Cumulative fluoride release patterns were determined from the incremental data. RESULTS: The coating of AgF greatly enhanced the level of fluoride ion release from all materials tested. Of the uncoated samples, Vitrehond released the greater concentrations of fluoride ion, followed by Fuji VII. However, cumulative levels of fluoride released from coated samples of the GICs almost matched those from coated Vitrebond. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that a coating of 10% AgF on GICs and a resin modified GIC greatly enhanced the concentration of fluoride released from these materials. This finding might be applied to improving protection against recurrent caries, particularly in high caries risk patients, and in the atraumatic restorative technique (ART) of restoration placement
Efficacy of Light-Activated Sealant on Enamel Demineralization in Orthodontic Patients: An Atomic Force Microscope Evaluation
Cariostatic effect and fluoride release from a visible light-curing adhesive for bonding of orthodontic brackets
Cariostatic effect and fluoride release from a visible light-curing adhesive for bonding of orthodontic brackets
This study was designed to investigate the cariostatic potential in vivo of a visible light-curing adhesive for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. The fluoride release of the adhesive in water and saliva was also measured. Ten orthodontic patients with premolars to be extracted participated. One bracket with Heliosit-Orthodontic (no fluoride) was positioned on the buccal surface of one premolar (control), and another bracket with Orthodontic cement VP 862 (containing fluoride) was positioned on the experimental contralateral premolar. The adhesives were cured with a Heliolux II lamp, and the teeth were extracted after 4 weeks. The patients used a fluoride toothpaste during the experiment. The mineral content of the enamel adjacent to the brackets was determined by quantitative microradiography. The fluoride release from disk-shaped plates of the fluoride adhesive was measured in water for a 6-month period and in human saliva for 24 hours. The fluoride adhesive reduced lesion depths by about 48% than the nonfluoride adhesive (P <0.05, t test). The largest release of fluoride from the plates in water was observable within the first week. However, a significant amount of fluoride was still released after 6 months. The fluoride release in saliva was significantly lower in human saliva at pH 7 than in water (P <0.01, t test). When salivary pH was lowered to 4, to mimic a cariogenic challenge, the amount of fluoride released increased up to the value measured in water. It was concluded that the regular use of fluoride toothpastes is insufficient to inhibit lesion development around orthodontic brackets. A fluoride-releasing adhesive reduced lesion development significantly adjacent to brackets compared with a nonfluoride adhesive. The fluoride release was found to be pH dependent and more rational in vivo than may be observed in water