24 research outputs found

    Strong-field scattering of two black holes: Numerical Relativity meets Post-Minkowskian gravity

    Full text link
    We compare numerical relativity (NR) data on the scattering of equal-mass, non-spinning binary black holes to various analytical predictions, based on post-Minkowskian (PM) results. While the usual sequence of PM-expanded scattering angles shows a rather poor convergence towards NR data, we find that a reformulation of PM information in terms of Effective-One-Body radial potentials leads to remarkable agreement with NR data, especially when using the radiation-reacted 4PM information. Using Firsov's inversion formula we directly extract, for the first time, from NR simulations a (radiation-reacted) gravitational potential describing the scattering of equal-mass, non-spinning binary black holes. We urge the NR community to compute more sequences of scattering simulations, so as to extend this knowledge to a wider region of parameter space.Comment: 16 pages, 7 figure

    Spin-orbit contribution to radiative losses for spinning binaries with aligned spins

    Full text link
    We compute the leading order contribution to radiative losses in the case of spinning binaries with aligned spins due to their spin-orbit interaction. The orbital average along hyperboliclike orbits is taken through an appropriate spin-orbit modification to the quasi-Keplerian parametrization for nonspinning bodies, which maintains the same functional form, but with spin-dependent orbital elements. We perform consistency checks with existing PN-based and PM-based results. In the former case, we compare our expressions for both radiated energy and angular momentum with those obtained in [JHEP \textbf{04}, 154 (2022)] by applying the boundary-to-bound correspondence to known results for ellipticlike orbits, finding agreement. The linear momentum loss is instead newly computed here. In the latter case, we also find agreement with the low-velocity limit of recent calculations of the total radiated energy, angular momentum and linear momentum in the framework of an extension of the worldline quantum field theory approach to the classical scattering of spinning bodies at the leading post-Minkowskian order [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{128}, no.1, 011101 (2022), Phys. Rev. D \textbf{106}, no.4, 044013 (2022)]. We get exact expressions of the radiative losses in terms of the orbital elements, even if they are at the leading post-Newtonian order, so that their expansion for large values of the eccentricity parameter (or equivalently of the impact parameter) provides higher-order terms in the corresponding post-Minkowskian expansion, which can be useful for future crosschecks of other approaches.Comment: 10 pages, no figures, revtex macro

    TEOBResumS: Analytic systematics in next-generation of effective-one-body gravitational waveform models for future observations

    Full text link
    The success of analytic waveform modeling within the effective-one-body (EOB) approach relies on the precise understanding of the physical importance of each technical element included in the model. The urgency of constructing progressively more sophisticated and complete waveform models (e.g. including spin precession and eccentricity) partly defocused the research from a careful comprehension of each building block (e.g. Hamiltonian, radiation reaction, ringdown attachment). Here we go back to the spirit of the first EOB works. We focus first on nonspinning, quasi-circular, black hole binaries and analyze systematically the mutual synergy between numerical relativity (NR) informed functions and the high post-Newtonian corrections (up to 5PN) to the EOB potentials. Our main finding is that it is essential to correctly control the noncircular part of the dynamics during the late plunge up to merger. When this happens, either using NR-informed non-quasi-circular corrections to the waveform (and flux) or high-PN corrections in the radial EOB potentials (D,Q)(D,Q), it is easy to obtain EOB/NR unfaithfulness ∼10βˆ’4\sim 10^{-4} with the noise of either Advanced LIGO or 3G detectors. We then improve the {\tt TEOBResumS-GIOTTO} waveform model for quasi-circular, spin-aligned binaries black hole binaries. We obtain maximal EOB/NR unfaithfulness FΛ‰EOBNRmax∼10βˆ’3{\bar{\cal F}}^{\rm max}_{\rm EOBNR}\sim 10^{-3} (with Advanced LIGO noise and in the total mass range 10βˆ’200MβŠ™10-200M_\odot) for the dominant β„“=m=2\ell=m=2 mode all over the 534 spin-aligned configurations available through the Simulating eXtreme Spacetime catalog. The model performance, also including higher modes, is then explored using NR surrogate waveform models to validate {\tt TEOBResumS-GIOTTO} up to mass ratio m1/m2=15m_1/m_2=15.Comment: 23 pages, 27 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev.

    GW190521 as a dynamical capture of two nonspinning black holes

    Full text link
    Gravitational waves from ∼90\sim 90 black holes binary systems have currently been detected by the LIGO and Virgo experiments, and their progenitors' properties inferred. This allowed the scientific community to draw conclusions on the formation channels of black holes in binaries, informing population models and -- at times -- defying our understanding of black hole astrophysics. The most challenging event detected so far is the short duration gravitational-wave transient GW190521. We analyze this signal under the hypothesis that it was generated by the merger of two nonspinning black holes on hyperbolic orbits. The best configuration matching the data corresponds to two black holes of source frame masses of 81βˆ’25+62MβŠ™81^{+62}_{-25}M_\odot and 52βˆ’32+32MβŠ™52^{+32}_{-32}M_\odot undergoing two encounters and then merging into an intermediate-mass black hole. We find that the hyperbolic merger hypothesis is favored with respect to a quasi-circular merger with precessing spins with Bayes' factors larger than 4300 to 1, although this number will be reduced by the currently uncertain prior odds. Our results suggest that GW190521 might be the first gravitational-wave detection from the dynamical capture of two stellar-mass nonspinning black holes.Comment: Version accepted for publicatio
    corecore