18 research outputs found
ΠΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ² Π² Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ°Ρ Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΈ
Π Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΏΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ
ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ°Ρ
Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Π΅ΠΉ Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ.The paper devoted to sequence approximation method using for geotechnical mechanic influence parameters evaluating tasks. An anchor influence parameters evaluating consist of univariable function powers comparisons in point vicinity representation as univariable power function product. Method applied to some geotechnical mechanic tasks
Failure to Respond after Reinstatement of Antidepressant Medication:A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Following remission of an anxiety disorder or a depressive disorder, antidepressants are frequently discontinued and in the case of symptom occurrence reinstated. Reinstatement of antidepressants seems less effective in some patients, but an overview is lacking. This systematic review aimed to provide insight into the magnitude and risk factors of response failure after reinstatement of antidepressants in patients with anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHOD: PubMed, Embase, and trial registers were systematically searched for studies in which patients: (1) had an anxiety disorder, a depressive disorder, OCD, or PTSD and (2) experienced failure to respond after reinstatement of a previously effective antidepressant. RESULTS: Ten studies reported failure to respond following antidepressant reinstatement. The phenomenon was observed in 16.5% of patients with a depressive disorder, OCD, and social phobia and occurred in all common classes of antidepressants. The range of response failure was broad, varying between 3.8 and 42.9% across studies. No risk factors for failure to respond were investigated. The overall study quality was limited. CONCLUSION: Research investigating response failure is scarce and the study quality limited. Response failure occurred in a substantial minority of patients. Contributors to the relevance of this phenomenon are the prevalence of the investigated disorders, the number of patients being treated with antidepressants, and the occurrence of response failure for all common classes of antidepressants. This systematic review highlights the need for studies systematically investigating this phenomenon and associated risk factors
Long-term antidepressant use: a qualitative study on perspectives of patients and GPs in primary care
Background
Antidepressant use is often prolonged in patients with anxiety and/or depressive disorder(s) compared with recommendations in treatment guidelines to discontinue after sustained remission.
Aim
To unravel the motivations of patients and GPs causing long-term antidepressant use and to gain insight into possibilities to prevent unnecessary long-term use. Design and setting Qualitative study using semi-structured, in-depth interviews with patients and GPs in the Netherlands.
Method
Patients with anxiety and/or depressive disorder(s) (n = 38) and GPs (n = 26) were interviewed. Innovatively, the interplay between patients and their GPs was also investigated by means of patient-GP dyads (n = 20).
Results
The motives and barriers of patients and GPs to continue or discontinue antidepressants were related to the availability of supportive guidance during discontinuation, the personal circumstances of the patient, and considerations of the patient or GP. Importantly, dyads indicated a large variation in policies of general practices around long-term use and continuation or discontinuation of antidepressants. Dyads further indicated that patients and GPs seemed unaware of each other's (mismatching) expectations regarding responsibility to initiate discussing continuation or discontinuation.
Conclusion
Although motives and barriers to antidepressant continuation or discontinuation were related to the same themes for patients and GPs, dyads indicated discrepancies between them. Discussion between patients and GPs about antidepressant use and continuation or discontinuation may help clarify mutual expectations and opinions. Agreements between a patient and their GP can be included in a patient-tailored treatment plan
Optimising Extinction of Conditioned Disgust
Maladaptive disgust responses are tenacious and resistant to exposure-based interventions. In a similar vein, laboratory studies have shown that conditioned disgust is relatively insensitive to Conditioned Stimulus (CS)-only extinction procedures. The relatively strong resistance to extinction might be explained by disgustβs adaptive function to motivate avoidance from contamination threats (pathogens) that cannot be readily detected and are invisible to the naked eye. Therefore, the mere visual presentation of unreinforced disgust eliciting stimuli might not be sufficient to correct a previously acquired threat value of the CS+. Following this, the current study tested whether the efficacy of CS-only exposure can be improved by providing additional safety information about the CS+. For the CSs we included two neutral items a pea soup and a sausage roll, whereas for the Unconditioned Stimulus (US) we used one video clip of a woman vomiting and a neutral one about glass blowing. The additional safety information was conveyed by allowing actual contact with the CS+ or by observing an actress eating the food items representing the CS+. When additional safety information was provided via allowing direct contact with the CS+, there was a relatively strong post-extinction increase in participantsβ willingness-to-eat the CS+. This beneficial effect was still evident at one-week follow up. Also self-reported disgust was lower at one-week follow up when additional safety information was provided. The current findings help explain why disgust is relatively insensitive to CS-only extinction procedures, and provide helpful starting points to improve interventions that are aimed to reduce distress in disgust-related psychopathology
Corrugator conditioned response.
<p>Mean response in the different phases (habituation, acquisition, extinction) of the facial corrugator towards the CS+ and CSβ.</p
Self-reported willingness-to-eat.
<p>Total scores in the different phases (habituation, acquisition, extinction, 24hrs and 7 days) of the self-reported willingness-to-eat.</p
Self-reported disgust.
<p>Total scores in the different phases (habituation, acquisition, extinction, 24hrs and 7 days) of the self-reported disgust.</p
Self-reported valence.
<p>Total scores in the different phases (habituation, acquisition, extinction, 24hrs and 7 days) of the self-reported valence.</p
Levator conditioned response.
<p>Mean response in the different phases (habituation, acquisition, extinction) of the facial levator towards the CS+ and CSβ.</p
Daily symptom ratings for studying premenstrual dysphoric disorder:A review
Background: To review how daily symptom ratings have been used in research into premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), and to discuss opportunities for the future. Methods: PsycINFO and Medline were systematically searched, resulting in the inclusion of 75 studies in which (1) participants met the diagnostic criteria for late luteal phase dysphoric disorder (LLPDD) or PMDD and (2) diaries were used to study LLPDD/PMDD. Results: To date, diaries have been used to gain insight into the aetiology and phenomenology of PMDD, to examine associated biological factors, and to assess treatment efficacy. We found low consistency among the diaries used, and often only part of the menstrual cycle was analysed instead of the whole menstrual cycle. We also observed that there was substantial variability in diagnostic procedures and criteria. Limitations: This review excluded diary studies conducted in women with premenstrual syndrome, women seeking help for premenstrual complaints without a clear diagnosis, and women without premenstrual complaints. Conclusions: Prospective daily ratings of symptoms and related variables provide a valuable and important tool in the study of PMDD. This paper addresses some options for improving the use of diaries and proposes the use of experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment to investigate within-person variability in symptoms in more detail. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved