Analysis of trace amounts of oxygen, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in nitrogen using gas chromatography

An in-house developed method is presented for the purity analysis of nitrogen (N2) built-in purifier (BIPTM)) gas for the trace contaminant gases carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2)) and carbon monoxide (CO), using gas chromatography with a pulsed discharge helium ionisation detector (GC-PDHID). Nitrogen BIPTM gas is used as a “matrix” gas or diluent gas for the gravimetric preparation of binary reference materials of CO, CO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2)) and nitric oxide (NO) at the CSIR NML gas metrology laboratory. Purity analysis of nitrogen BIPTM is required to decrease the measurement uncertainty of the calculated gravimetric concentrations of the gaseous reference materials produced. The aim of the research was to find a method where amounts <0.25 x 10-6 mol•mol-1 of CO2), O2) and CO could be simultaneously analysed in high purity nitrogen within a short time, with minimum cost and on a routine basis. Gas mixtures of trace amounts of CO2), O2) and CO in N2) were separated and quantified using a parallel dual capillary column configuration with temperature and pressure programming and a pulsed discharge helium ionisation detector (PDHID). The detection limits were 9 x 10-9 mol•mol-1 for CO2), 7 x 10-9 mol•mol-1 for O2) and 37 x 10-9 mol•mol-1 for CO with repeatability precision of 1% for carbon dioxide, 1% for oxygen and 10% for carbon monoxide for a 0.2 x 10-6 mol•mol-1 standard. The detection limits obtained were lower than those reported previously by other investigators for similar methods and the validation for the method as set out in this investigation seems to be the first for trace amounts of CO2), O2) and CO in nitrogen. The method was validated by comparison of the CO2) and CO results with results obtained using a flame ionisation detector and methanisation. The technique of sequence reversal was used to improve the peak shape of CO but there was no improvement on the results obtained with temperature and pressure programming. Although no helium purging was used to reduce atmospheric contamination, it was shown that the main source of contamination from the air was through the sampling system which was reduced to a level of ± 20 x 10-9 mol•mol-1 oxygen simply by using a higher sample flow rate. It was also found that even when large amounts of CO2) were adsorbed onto the molecular sieve column, this made no difference to the column performance at trace levels. The method has also been validated for the analysis of nitrogen in high purity oxygen and may also be used to analyse carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in oxygen as well.Dissertation (MSc (Chemistry))--University of Pretoria, 2008.Chemistryunrestricte

International comparison CCQM-K51: Carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen (5 µmol mol−1)

The first key comparison on carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen dates back to 1992 (CCQM-K1a). It was one of the first types of gas mixtures that were used in an international key comparison. Since then, numerous national metrology institutes (NMIs) have been setting up facilities for gas analysis, and have developed claims for their Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMCs) for these mixtures. Furthermore, in the April 2005 meeting of the CCQM (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance) Gas Analysis Working Group, a policy was proposed to repeat key comparisons for stable mixtures every 10 years. This comparison was performed in line with the policy proposal and provided an opportunity for NMIs that could not participate in the previous comparison. NMISA from South Africa acted as the pilot laboratory. Of the 25 participating laboratories, 19 (76%) showed satisfactory degrees of equivalence to the gravimetric reference value. The results show that the CO concentration is not influenced by the measurement method used, and from this it may be concluded that the pure CO, used to prepare the gas mixtures, was not 13C-isotope depleted. This was confirmed by the isotope ratio analysis carried out by KRISS on a 1% mixture of CO in nitrogen, obtained from the NMISA. There is no indication of positive or negative bias in the gravimetric reference value, as the results from the different laboratories are evenly distributed on both sides of the key comparison reference value

International Comparison CCQM-P28: Ozone at Ambient Level

We report a pilot study organized within the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM), in which the ozone reference standards of 23 institutes have been compared to one common reference, the BIPM ozone reference standard, in a series of bilateral comparisons carried out between July 2003 and February 2005. The BIPM, which maintains as its reference standard a standard reference photometer (SRP) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, United States), served as pilot laboratory. A total of 25 instruments were compared to the common reference standard, either directly (16 comparisons) or via a transfer standard (9 comparisons). The comparisons were made over the ozone mole fraction range 0 nmol/mol to 500 nmol/mol. Two reference methods for measuring ozone mole fractions in synthetic air were compared, thanks to the participation of two institutes maintaining a gas-phase titration system with traceability of measurements to primary gas standards of NO and NO2, while the 23 other instruments were based on UV absorption. In the first instance, each comparison was characterized by the two parameters of a linear equation, as well as their related uncertainties, computed with generalized least-squares regression software. Analysis of these results using the Birge ratio indicated an underestimation of the uncertainties associated with the measurement results of some of the ozone standards, particularly the NIST SRPs. As a final result of the pilot study, the difference from the reference value (BIPM-SRP27 measurement result) and its related uncertainty were calculated for each ozone standard at the two nominal ozone mole fractions of 80 nmol/mol and 420 nmol/mol.JRC.H.4-Transport and air qualit

International Comparison CCQM-K51 - Carbon Monoxide (CO) in Nitrogen (5 µmol mol-1)

The first key comparison on carbon monoxide (CO) in nitrogen dates back to 1992 (CCQM-K1a). It was one of the first types of gas mixtures that were used in an international key comparison. Since then, numerous national metrology institutes (NMIs) have been setting up facilities for gas analysis, and have developed claims for their Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMCs) for these mixtures. Furthermore, in the April 2005 meeting of the CCQM (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance) Gas Analysis Working Group, a policy was proposed to repeat key comparisons for stable mixtures every 10 years. This comparison was performed in line with the policy proposal and provided an opportunity for NMIs that could not participate in the previous comparison. NMISA from South Africa acted as the pilot laboratory. Of the 25 participating laboratories, 19 (76%) showed satisfactory degrees of equivalence to the gravimetric reference value. The results show that the CO concentration is not influenced by the measurement method used, and from this it may be concluded that the pure CO, used to prepare the gas mixtures, was not 13C-isotope depleted. This was confirmed by the isotope ratio analysis carried out by KRISS on a 1% mixture of CO in nitrogen, obtained from the NMISA. There is no indication of positive or negative bias in the gravimetric reference value, as the results from the different laboratories are evenly distributed on both sides of the key comparison reference value.JRC.H.2-Air and Climat