Most Peers Don’t Believe It, Hence It Is Probably False

Rob Lovering has recently argued that since theists have been unable, by means of philosophical arguments, to convince 85 percent of professional philosophers that God exists, at least one of their defining beliefs must be either false or meaningless. This paper is a critical examination of his argument. First we present Lovering’s argument and point out its salient features. Next we explain why the argument’s conclusion is entirely acceptable for theists, even if, as we show, there are multiple problems with the premises

Future Certainties

I argue that there are three kinds of future certainties: metaphysical, natural, and promises

Kuyper als vrijheidsstrijder voor de wetenschap

Dit artikel gaat over Kuyper ideeen over de universiteit, souvereiniteit in eigen kring, en vrijheid van onderzoek