Current and future directions in frailty research.

The concept of frailty has been evolving dramatically for the past 30 years. Through its evolution, a variety of single and multidimensional models have been used to describe frailty. This article reviews the current literature related to the defining dimensions of frailty and identifies the gaps in the literature requiring additional research. A detailed literature review was performed to identify key dimensions and models currently being used to define frailty, classify interventions that have been developed to reverse frailty, and identify potential areas for future research within this field. Despite the large body of research defining the dimensions of frailty, no consensus exists on a comprehensive, operational definition. A standardized definition will be critical to design effective interventions at earlier stages along the continuum of frailty and interpret findings from evaluation studies. Identified gaps in the literature include studies supporting the utility of expanding the definition of frailty to incorporate social determinants, studies evaluating the role of obesity in the development of frailty, and the need for longitudinal studies for defining the pathways to developing frailty. This review highlights the need for an accurate definition of frailty and for longitudinal research to explore the development of frailty and evaluate the effectiveness of the frailty reversal interventions that may avert or delay adverse outcomes within this susceptible population. These future research needs are discussed within the context of the growing pressures to bring down health care costs, and the role of comparative effectiveness research and cost-effectiveness research in identifying interventions with the potential to help slow the growth of health care spending among the elderly

Education and referral criteria: impact on oncology referrals to palliative care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a quality improvement project involving education and referral criteria to influence oncology provider referrals to a palliative care service. METHODS: A single group post-test only quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate palliative care service (PCS) referrals following an intervention consisting of a didactic presentation, education outreach visits (EOV) to key providers, and referral criteria. Data on patient demographics, cancer types, consult volume, reasons for referral, pre-consult length of stay, overall hospital stay, and discharge disposition were collected pre-intervention, then post-intervention for 7.5 months and compared. SETTING AND SAMPLE: Attending oncologists, nurse practitioner, and house staff from the solid tumor division at a 700-bed urban teaching hospital participated in the project. Two geriatricians, a palliative care nurse practitioner, and rotating geriatric fellows staffed the PCS. RESULTS: The percentage of oncology referrals to PCS increased significantly following the intervention (χ(2) = 6.108, p = .013). 24.9% (390) patients were referred in the 4.6 years pre-intervention and 31.5% (106) patients were referred during 7.5 months post-intervention. The proportion of consults for pain management was significantly greater post-intervention (χ(2) = 5.378, p = .02), compared to pre-intervention, when most referrals were related to end-of-life issues. Lung, pancreatic, and colon were the most common cancer types at both periods, and there were no significant differences in patient demographics, pre-referral length of hospitalization or overall hospital days. There was a trend toward more patients being discharged alive following the intervention. CONCLUSION: A quality improvement project supported the use of education and referral criteria to influence both the frequency and reasons for palliative care referral by oncology providers

From measurement to management: A case study in hospice AQPI

Measurement of the quality of hospice care is challenging given the severity of illness of hospice patients; the rapid decline in their functional status and ability to report symptoms; the fact that they are receiving care in their homes, which generally means that a clinician is present only episodically to record symptoms or other outcomes of interest; and the fact that most hospices are relatively small, with correspondingly limited operating budgets. Lack of automation leads to laborious manual recording and aggregation of data for quality assurance purposes

Making pain relief a priority ... dispelling the myths about pain and pain management in the older adult.

Despite advances in the assessment and management of persistent pain, clinicians commonly under-appreciate and, as a result, under-treat pain in older adults. Seniors residing in assisted living or long term care settings are especially vulnerable to pain undertreatment. In fact, it has been reported that up to 80% of nursing home residents have significant pain. In ALFs, where residents generally are more independent and less rigorously monitored, the incidence of untreated pain is likely to be high as well. Additionally, there is a high incidence of dementia, cognitive impairment of some degree, and other disabilities that limit residents’ ability to self-report pain

Voices yet unheard

The voice of the person facing the end of his life sometimes seems to be lost in the current dialogue about improving end-of-life care. This essay addresses clinicians\u27 fears about direct, open communication with the seriously ill patient about death and proposes a lens for viewing the end of life that honors the life still left to live

End-of-life care for hospitalized patients with lung cancer: utilization of a palliative care service.

PURPOSE: High symptom burden and hospital mortality among patients with lung cancer argues for early palliative care intervention. Patient characteristics and discharge dispositions in hospitalized patients with lung cancer receiving usual care were compared to those referred to a new palliative care service. METHODS: A retrospective database review of all lung cancer discharges receiving usual care (UC) and palliative care service (PCS) consultation was conducted. Demographics, length of stay, discharge disposition, and mortality were described and compared. Palliative Performance Scale scores were described according to discharge disposition in the PCS group. Disposition of all patients receiving either chemotherapy or surgery was also noted. RESULTS: A total of 1476 hospital discharges with a diagnosis of lung cancer occurred between March 15, 2006 and June 30, 2009. Among all discharges, 9% received chemotherapy and 29% had surgery. The PCS was consulted for 8% of all lung cancer patients most commonly to address end-of-life-issues. PCS patients were more likely to be at the end-of-life than UC patients as evidenced by higher hospital mortality (31% versus 7%), higher intensive care (ICU) mortality (67% versus 16%) and more frequent discharge to hospice (41% versus 7%). PCS patients were hospitalized a median of 6 days before a referral was made. Hospitalization was significantly longer for PCS patients (M = 16.3 days, p \u3c 0.001) than UC patients (M = 8.3 days). CONCLUSIONS: In the first 3 years of a new palliative care initiative consults for lung cancer patients occurred late in the hospital stay or when death was imminent