Association of optic disc pallor and RNFL thickness with cerebral small vessel disease in the PREVENT-Dementia study

INTRODUCTION: We tested associations between two retinal measures (optic disc pallor, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [pRNFL] thickness) and four magnetic resonance imaging markers of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD; lacunes, microbleeds, white matter hyperintensities, and enlarged perivascular spaces [ePVSs]).METHODS: We used PallorMetrics to quantify optic disc pallor from fundus photographs, and pRNFL thickness from optical coherence tomography scans. Linear and logistic regression assessed relationships between retinal measures and SVD markers. Participants ( N = 108, mean age 51.6) were from the PREVENT Dementia study. RESULTS: Global optic disc pallor was linked to ePVSs in the basal ganglia in both left ( β = 0.12, standard error [SE] = 0.05, P &lt; 0.05) and right eyes ( β = 0.13, SE = 0.05, P &lt; 0.05). Associations were also noted in different disc sectors. No pRNFL associations with SVD markers were found. DISCUSSION: Optic disc pallor correlated with ePVSs in the basal ganglia, suggesting retinal examination may be a useful method to study brain health changes related to SVD.HIGHLIGHTS: Optic disc pallor is linked to enlarged perivascular spaces in basal ganglia.There is no association between peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and cerebral small vessel disease markers.Optic disc examination could provide insights into brain health.The sample included 108 midlife adults from the PREVENT Dementia study.</p

An open-source deep learning algorithm for efficient and fully-automatic analysis of the choroid in optical coherence tomography

Purpose: To develop an open-source, fully-automatic deep learning algorithm, DeepGPET, for choroid region segmentation in optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. Methods: We used a dataset of 715 OCT B-scans (82 subjects, 115 eyes) from 3 clinical studies related to systemic disease. Ground truth segmentations were generated using a clinically validated, semi-automatic choroid segmentation method, Gaussian Process Edge Tracing (GPET). We finetuned a UNet with MobileNetV3 backbone pre-trained on ImageNet. Standard segmentation agreement metrics, as well as derived measures of choroidal thickness and area, were used to evaluate DeepGPET, alongside qualitative evaluation from a clinical ophthalmologist. Results: DeepGPET achieves excellent agreement with GPET on data from 3 clinical studies (AUC=0.9994, Dice=0.9664; Pearson correlation of 0.8908 for choroidal thickness and 0.9082 for choroidal area), while reducing the mean processing time per image on a standard laptop CPU from 34.49s ($\pm$15.09) using GPET to 1.25s ($\pm$0.10) using DeepGPET. Both methods performed similarly according to a clinical ophthalmologist, who qualitatively judged a subset of segmentations by GPET and DeepGPET, based on smoothness and accuracy of segmentations. Conclusions :DeepGPET, a fully-automatic, open-source algorithm for choroidal segmentation, will enable researchers to efficiently extract choroidal measurements, even for large datasets. As no manual interventions are required, DeepGPET is less subjective than semi-automatic methods and could be deployed in clinical practice without necessitating a trained operator. DeepGPET addresses the lack of open-source, fully-automatic and clinically relevant choroid segmentation algorithms, and its subsequent public release will facilitate future choroidal research both in ophthalmology and wider systemic health.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables. Currently in submission to ARVO TVST (Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Translational Vision Science & Technology). GitHub link to codebase provided upon publicatio

Choroidalyzer: An open-source, end-to-end pipeline for choroidal analysis in optical coherence tomography

Purpose: To develop Choroidalyzer, an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for segmenting the choroid region, vessels, and fovea, and deriving choroidal thickness, area, and vascular index. Methods: We used 5,600 OCT B-scans (233 subjects, 6 systemic disease cohorts, 3 device types, 2 manufacturers). To generate region and vessel ground-truths, we used state-of-the-art automatic methods following manual correction of inaccurate segmentations, with foveal positions manually annotated. We trained a U-Net deep-learning model to detect the region, vessels, and fovea to calculate choroid thickness, area, and vascular index in a fovea-centred region of interest. We analysed segmentation agreement (AUC, Dice) and choroid metrics agreement (Pearson, Spearman, mean absolute error (MAE)) in internal and external test sets. We compared Choroidalyzer to two manual graders on a small subset of external test images and examined cases of high error. Results: Choroidalyzer took 0.299 seconds per image on a standard laptop and achieved excellent region (Dice: internal 0.9789, external 0.9749), very good vessel segmentation performance (Dice: internal 0.8817, external 0.8703) and excellent fovea location prediction (MAE: internal 3.9 pixels, external 3.4 pixels). For thickness, area, and vascular index, Pearson correlations were 0.9754, 0.9815, and 0.8285 (internal) / 0.9831, 0.9779, 0.7948 (external), respectively (all p<0.0001). Choroidalyzer's agreement with graders was comparable to the inter-grader agreement across all metrics. Conclusions: Choroidalyzer is an open-source, end-to-end pipeline that accurately segments the choroid and reliably extracts thickness, area, and vascular index. Especially choroidal vessel segmentation is a difficult and subjective task, and fully-automatic methods like Choroidalyzer could provide objectivity and standardisation

Choroidalyzer: An open-source, end-to-end pipeline for choroidal analysis in optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE: To develop Choroidalyzer, an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for segmenting the choroid region, vessels, and fovea, and deriving choroidal thickness, area, and vascular index.METHODS: We used 5600 OCT B-scans (233 subjects, six systemic disease cohorts, three device types, two manufacturers). To generate region and vessel ground-truths, we used state-of-the-art automatic methods following manual correction of inaccurate segmentations, with foveal positions manually annotated. We trained a U-Net deep learning model to detect the region, vessels, and fovea to calculate choroid thickness, area, and vascular index in a fovea-centered region of interest. We analyzed segmentation agreement (AUC, Dice) and choroid metrics agreement (Pearson, Spearman, mean absolute error [MAE]) in internal and external test sets. We compared Choroidalyzer to two manual graders on a small subset of external test images and examined cases of high error.RESULTS: Choroidalyzer took 0.299 seconds per image on a standard laptop and achieved excellent region (Dice: internal 0.9789, external 0.9749), very good vessel segmentation performance (Dice: internal 0.8817, external 0.8703), and excellent fovea location prediction (MAE: internal 3.9 pixels, external 3.4 pixels). For thickness, area, and vascular index, Pearson correlations were 0.9754, 0.9815, and 0.8285 (internal)/0.9831, 0.9779, 0.7948 (external), respectively (all P &lt; 0.0001). Choroidalyzer's agreement with graders was comparable to the intergrader agreement across all metrics.CONCLUSIONS: Choroidalyzer is an open-source, end-to-end pipeline that accurately segments the choroid and reliably extracts thickness, area, and vascular index. Especially choroidal vessel segmentation is a difficult and subjective task, and fully automatic methods like Choroidalyzer could provide objectivity and standardization.</p

Choroidalyzer: an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for choroidal analysis in optical coherence tomography

Purpose: To develop Choroidalyzer, an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for segmenting the choroid region, vessels, and fovea, and deriving choroidal thickness, area, and vascular index. Methods: We used 5600 OCT B-scans (233 subjects, six systemic disease cohorts, three device types, two manufacturers). To generate region and vessel ground-truths, we used state-of-the-art automatic methods following manual correction of inaccurate segmentations, with foveal positions manually annotated. We trained a U-Net deep learning model to detect the region, vessels, and fovea to calculate choroid thickness, area, and vascular index in a fovea-centered region of interest. We analyzed segmentation agreement (AUC, Dice) and choroid metrics agreement (Pearson, Spearman, mean absolute error [MAE]) in internal and external test sets. We compared Choroidalyzer to two manual graders on a small subset of external test images and examined cases of high error. Results: Choroidalyzer took 0.299 seconds per image on a standard laptop and achieved excellent region (Dice: internal 0.9789, external 0.9749), very good vessel segmentation performance (Dice: internal 0.8817, external 0.8703), and excellent fovea location prediction (MAE: internal 3.9 pixels, external 3.4 pixels). For thickness, area, and vascular index, Pearson correlations were 0.9754, 0.9815, and 0.8285 (internal)/0.9831, 0.9779, 0.7948 (external), respectively (all P &lt; 0.0001). Choroidalyzer’s agreement with graders was comparable to the intergrader agreement across all metrics. Conclusions: Choroidalyzer is an open-source, end-to-end pipeline that accurately segments the choroid and reliably extracts thickness, area, and vascular index. Especially choroidal vessel segmentation is a difficult and subjective task, and fully automatic methods like Choroidalyzer could provide objectivity and standardization.</p

Data for study Imbio

## Access ## This dataset is held in the Edinburgh DataVault, directly accessible only to authorised University of Edinburgh staff. External users may request access to a copy of the data by contacting the Principal Investigator, Contact Person or Data Manager named on this page. University of Edinburgh users who wish to have direct access should consult the information about retrieving data from the DataVault at: https://www.ed.ac.uk/is/research-support/datavault.The scanning and data for the Imbio stud