14 research outputs found

    Results of intraarterial cisplatin and hyperfractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the oropharynx and oral cavity

    No full text
    5563 Background: Intraarterial cisplatin and hyperfractionated radiation (HYPERADPLAT) is an accepted therapy for Stage III and IV head and neck cancer. We present long-term follow-up of patients with OP and OC cancer treated with HYPERADPLAT at a single institution. Methods: 44 patients with Stage III-IV squamous cell carcinomas of the OP or OC were treated with the HYPERRADPLAT regimen consisting of external beam radiotherapy (76.8–81.6 Gy) delivered in 1.2 Gy BID fractions with intraarterial cisplatin (150 mg/m2) administered when patients had reached 60 Gy. Tumor response, disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were assessed for all patients according to NCI CCT criteria. Results: Of 44 patients, 21 had tumors of the base of tongue, 14-tonsil, 4-floor of mouth, and 5-other. Eighty eight percent of patients had T4 tumors and 7% had T3 tumors. Complete tumor response was observed in 86% of patients and 14% had a partial response. Lymph node metastases were present in 84% of patients with 78% of node positive patients having a complete nodal response and 19% with a partial response to treatment. Three-year DFS was 55% and OS was 45%. Locoregional recurrence was noted in 30% of patients and 16% had distant failure. Overall recurrence was noted in 47% of patients with a median time to recurrence of 8 months (range 4–55 months). Median weight loss during treatment was 9% of initial body weight and 28 patients required a feeding tube within 6 months of starting treatment. Grade 3 mucositis was noted in 68% of patients and 3 patients developed Grade 4 toxicity (2 mucosal, 1 hematologic). Conclusions: HYPERRADPLAT results in excellent tumor control that is well tolerated with minimal Grade 4 toxicity in patients with advanced poor prognosis cancers of the OP and OC. These results compare favorably with historically reported control rates and response for patients with a significantly high percentage of T4 tumors of the oropharynx and oral cavity. No significant financial relationships to disclose. </jats:p

    The effect of induction therapy with carboplatin-paclitaxel and low dose radiotherapy followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy and intraarterial chemotherapy on advanced cancers of the head and neck

    No full text
    15517 Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential benefits of induction therapy followed by intraarterial cisplatin and hyperfractionated radiation (HYPERRADPLAT) on patients with advanced head and neck tumors. Methods: 20 patients with Stage III-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with induction therapy consisting of 2 cycles of carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m2) and 0.8 Gy BID on the day of and the day following chemotherapy. Induction therapy was given over 2 cycles separated by 3 weeks (previously described in ASCO 2002 abstract # 921 and 2004 abstract # 5593). Patients were then treated with the HYPERRADPLAT regimen consisting of external beam radiotherapy (74.4–81.6 Gy) delivered in 1.2 Gy BID fractions with intraarterial cisplatin (150 mg/m2) administered when patients had reached 60 Gy. Tumor response, disease free survival, overall survival, and toxicity were assessed for all patients according to NCI CTCAE criteria. Results: Of 20 patients, 9 had tumors of the oropharynx, 9-supralaryngeal, and 2-hypopharyngeal. Fifty percent of patients had T4 tumors and 35% had T3 tumors. Complete tumor response was observed in 80% of patients and 20% had a partial response. Three-year disease free survival was 75% and overall survival was 75%. Locoregional recurrence was noted in 25% of patients and 15% had distant failure. Overall recurrence was noted in 40% of patients with a median time to recurrence of 12 months (range 6–55 months). Median weight loss during treatment was 10% of initial body weight and 13 patients required a feeding tube within 6 months of starting treatment. Grade 3 mucositis was noted in 65% of patients and no patients developed Grade 4 toxicity. Conclusions: Two cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel induction therapy followed by intraarterial cisplatin and hyperfractionated radiotherapy produces excellent tumor response and reduces distant failure. These results compare favorably with historical controls and produce tolerable toxicity profiles. [Table: see text] </jats:p

    Results of reduction of treatment intensity based on response to a novel induction therapy in stage III and IV head and neck cancer

    No full text
    5561 Background: Concurrent cisplatinum based chemotherapy and qd radiotherapy (RT) to 70 Gy is standard therapy for stage III-IV head and neck (H/N) SCCA. Presented is a prospective IRB approved study tailoring the definitive therapy based on response to induction therapy. Methods: 25 patients with Stage III-IV H/N SCCA were treated with 2 cycles of induction therapy every 21 days comprised of carboplatin (AUC 6 day 1), paclitaxel (75 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15), and low dose RT (0.5 Gy BID days 1, 2, 8, and 15) for chemosensitization. The response rates of this mode of induction therapy have been presented previously (ASCO 2005 #3184). Patients with complete response (CR) to induction were treated with reduced dose RT at the primary site (reduced from 70 to 60–66 Gy) and 2 cycles of IV cisplatin (100 mg/m2) instead of 3. Those with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were treated with surgery and adjuvant therapy or with altered fractionation regimens. The impact of dose reduction on survival (OS and DFS), failure patterns, compliance and toxicity (according to NCI CTCAE) were used as end points for the study. Results: Patients included 9 with tonsil, 5-L, 3-HP, 3-OC, and 5-BOT. There were 4-T1,9-T2,9-T3,and 3-T4 tumors. The nodal involvement was N0–5, N1–3, N2–13, N3–4. Patients presented with Stage III (28%), IVA (52%), and IVB (20%). Sixty percent had a CR, 32% had a PR, and 8% had SD after induction therapy. Two patients with CR were non-compliant after induction therapy and not further evaluated. With a median FU of 20.5 months (range 11–36 mo) the OS and DFS is 100% (13/13) in the dose reduced group (CR) and 60% (6/10) in the PR/SD treated with more aggressive regimens. The incidence of distant failure is 40% (4/10) in the PR vs 0% (0/13) in the CR. No patients in the dose reduced group required feeding tubes; however 30% (3/10) were required in patients with PR. Compliance with chemotherapy was 79% (10/13) in the CR vs 80% (8/10) in the PR. Conclusions: Our early results show that the patients showing a CR to induction chemotherapy are a favorable group of patients and they may be treated with reduced treatment intensity. This report provides strong evidence that RT dose deescalation for head and neck cancers may be feasible following assessment after induction therapy. [Table: see text] </jats:p
    corecore