Pluronic® P123/F127 mixed micelles delivering sorafenib and its combination with verteporfin in cancer cells

Here, we developed Pluronic® P123/F127 (poloxamer) mixed micelles for the intravenous delivery of the anticancer drug sorafenib (SRB) or its combination with verteporfin (VP), a photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy that should complement well the cytotoxicity profile of the chemotherapeutic. SRB loading inside the core of micelles was governed by the drug:poloxamer weight ratio, while in the case of the SRB-VP combination, a mutual interference between the two drugs occurred and only specific ratios could ensure maximum loading efficiency. Coentrapment of SRB did not alter the photophysical properties of VP, confirming that SRB did not participate in any bimolecular process with the photosensitizer. Fluorescence resonance energy-transfer measurement of micelles in serum protein-containing cell-culture medium demonstrated the excellent stability of the system in physiologically relevant conditions. These results were in line with the results of the release study showing a release rate of both drugs in the presence of proteins slower than in phosphate buffer. SRB release was sustained, while VP remained substantially entrapped in the micelle core. Cytotoxicity studies in MDA-MB231 cells revealed that at 24 hours, SRB-loaded micelles were more active than free SRB only at very low SRB concentrations, while at 24+24 hours a prolonged cytotoxic effect of SRB-loaded micelles was observed, very likely mediated by the block in the S phase of the cell cycle. The combination of SRB with VP under light exposure was less cytotoxic than both the free combination and VP-loaded micelles + SRB-loaded micelles combination. This behavior was clearly explainable in terms of micelle uptake and intracellular localization. Besides the clear advantage of delivering SRB in poloxamer micelles, our results provide a clear example that each photochemotherapeutic combination needs detailed investigations on their particular interaction, and no generalization on enhanced cytotoxic effects should be derived a priori

Role of delivery vehicles for photosensitizers in the photodynamic therapy of tumours.

The use of photosensitizing drugs associated with different types of delivery vehicle has received strong interest within the field of the photodynamic therapy of tumours. Lipid-based delivery vehicles, such as liposomes and oil emulsions, allow the administration of water-insoluble photosensitizers, widening the choice of photosensitizers potentially useful for treating tumours. In some cases, these delivery vehicles increase the selectivity of tumour targeting by favouring photosensitizer uptake in tumour tissue. However, a higher selectivity of tumour targeting could be obtained through the association of photosensitizers with delivery vehicles which can interact preferentially or specifically with tumour cells. With this aim in mind, low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) and monoclonal antibodies, in particular, are regarded as the most promising delivery systems for anticancer drugs. Some pharmacokinetic studies with LDL-associated photosensitizers have demonstrated a higher tumour uptake compared with the same photosensitizers delivered with other formulations. Monoclonal antibody-coupled photosensitizers have been tested mainly in vitro, and have shown a high selectivity towards cells expressing specific antigens. Only a limited number of reports are available on the biodistribution of immunoconjugated photosensitizers and on their selectivity in vivo, so that their importance for the selectivity of tumour targeting has not yet been defined

Strategies for optimizing the delivery to tumors of macrocyclic photosensitizers used in photodynamic therapy (PDT)

This review briefly summaries the principles and mechanisms of action of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as concerns its application in the oncological field, highlighting its drawbacks and some of the strategies that have been or are being explored to overcome them. The major aim is to increase the efficiency and selectivity of the photosensitizer (PS) uptake in the cancer cells for optimizing the PDT effects on tumors while sparing normal cells. Some attempts to achieve this are based on the conjugation of the PS to biomolecules (small ligands, peptides) functioning as carriers with the ability to efficiently penetrate cells and/or specifically recognize and bind proteins/receptors overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells. Alternatively, the PS can be entrapped in nanocarriers derived from various types of materials that can target the tumor by exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects. The use of nanocarriers is particularly attractive because it allows the simultaneous delivery of more than one drug with the possibility of combining PDT with other therapeutic modalities.</jats:p

Folate-targeted PEGylated liposomes improve the selectivity of PDT with meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (m-THPC)

The folate receptor (FR) is over-expressed in many human tumours and is being intensively studied also in the field of nanomedicine as a target to enhance the selectivity of drug delivery to cancer cells by using nanocarriers bearing folic acid (FA) on their surface. In this study we report the encapsulation of the photosensitizer (PS) meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (m-THPC) in FA-targeted PEGylated liposomes used as a novel drug delivery system for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer. Our in vitro investigations revealed that only a modest fraction of targeted liposomes were internalized by specific endocytosis in FR-positive KB cells. However, FA-liposomes doubled the uptake of the entrapped m-THPC with respect to un-targeted liposomes and enhanced the photo-induced cytotoxicity in KB cells. In contrast, in FRnegative A549 cells FA-targeted or un-targeted liposomes exhibited a very similar extent of internalization and as a consequence the same photo-killing efficiency