100 research outputs found

    A Note on Interests, Values, and the Use of Force

    Get PDF

    The Bush Doctrine and War with Iraq

    Get PDF

    Exit Strategy Delusions

    Get PDF

    Bounding the Global War on Terrorism

    Get PDF
    The author examines three features of the war on terrorism as currently defined and conducted: (1) the administration\u27s postulation of the terrorist threat, (2) the scope and feasibility of U.S. war aims, and (3) the war\u27s political, fiscal, and military sustainability. He believes that the war on terrorism--as opposed to the campaign against al-Qaeda--lacks strategic clarity, embraces unrealistic objectives, and may not be sustainable over the long haul. He calls for downsizing the scope of the war on terrorism to reflect concrete U.S. security interests and the limits of American military power.https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/1780/thumbnail.jp

    Appeasement Reconsidered: Investigating the Mythology of the 1930s

    Get PDF
    U.S. use of force since 1945 has been significantly influenced by the perceived consequences of appeasing Hitler in the 1930s, and from the mid-1970s to 2001 by the chilling effect of the Vietnam War. As the United States approached its second war with Iraq, proponents cited the Munich analogy to justify the war, whereas opponents argued that the United States was risking another Vietnam. Though reasoning by historical analogies is inherently dangerous, an examination of the threat parallels between Hitler and Saddam Hussein, and between the Vietnam War and the situation the United States has confronted in post-Baathist Iraq, reveals that the Munich analogy was misused as an argument for war, whereas the American dilemma in Iraq bears some important analogies to the Vietnam conflict, especially with respect to the challenges state-building and sustaining domestic public support for an unpopular protracted war.https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/1735/thumbnail.jp

    Commentary & Reply

    Get PDF

    Commentary & Reply

    Get PDF

    Iraq and Vietnam: Differences, Similarities, and Insights

    Get PDF
    U.S. political and military difficulties in Iraq have prompted comparisons to the American war in Vietnam. The authors conclude that the military dimensions of the two conflicts bear little comparison. Among other things, the sheer scale of the Vietnam War in terms of forces committed and losses incurred dwarfs that of the Iraq War. They also conclude, however, that failed U.S. state-building in Vietnam and the impact of declining domestic political support for U.S. war aims in Vietnam are issues pertinent to current U.S. policy in Iraq.https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/1769/thumbnail.jp
    • …
    corecore