The role of human leukocyte antigen DRB1-DQB1 haplotypes in the susceptibility to acquired idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

The acquired form of idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is an autoimmune disease, in which the underlying ADAMTS13-deficiency is caused by inhibitory autoantibodies against the protease. Human leukocyte antigens (HLA), responsible for antigen presentation, play an important role in the development of antibodies. The loci coding HLA DR and DQ molecules are inherited in linkage as haplotypes. The c.1858C>T polymorphism of the PTPN22 gene, which codes a protein tyrosine phosphatase important in lymphocyte activation, predisposes to a number of autoimmune diseases. We determined the HLA-DRB1-DQB1 haplotypes and the PTPN22 c.1858C>T genotypes in 75 patients with acquired idiopathic TTP and in healthy controls, in order to assess the role of these genetic factors and their interactions in the susceptibility to TTP. We found that the carrier frequencies of the DRB1 *11-DQB1 *03 and DRB1 *15-DQB1 *06 haplotypes were higher, while those of the DRB1 *07-DQB1 *02 and DRB1 *13-DQB1 *06 haplotypes were lower in TTP patients. There was no difference in the overall frequency of the PTPN22 c.1858T allele between TTP patients and controls. In conclusion, we identified four HLA-DRB1-DQB1 haplotypes associated with an increased (DRB1 *11-DQB1 *03 and DRB1 *15-DQB1 *06) or a decreased (DRB1 *07-DQB1 *02 and DRB1 *13-DQB1 *06) susceptibility to acquired idiopathic TTP

Carboxiterminal pro-endothelin-1 as an endothelial cell biomarker in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is characterised by the deficiency of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) cleaving protease (ADAMTS-13). Although several observations indicate an important role of endothelial activation in the pathogenesis of TTP, no reliable endothelial activation markers are available in the clinical management of TTP. Our aim was to investigate the presence of endothelial activation in TTP and to determine its connections with disease activity, therapy and complement activation. We enrolled 54 patients (median age 40.5; 44 females) and 57 healthy controls (median age 34; 30 females),VWF antigen, carboxiterminal-pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1), complement Factor H and complement activation products (C3bBbP and SC5b-9) were measured. In both the acute and remission phase of TTP we found increased CT-proET-1 and VWF levels, while Factor H levels decreased compared with healthy controls. In remission, however, the elevated CT-proET-1 levels showed 22 % decrease when compared with the acute phase in paired samples (p=0.0031), whereas no changes for VWF and Factor H levels were observed. We also found positive correlations between CT-proET-1 levels and alternative pathway activation markers (C3bBbP; p=0.0360; r=0.4299). The data we present here demonstrate a role of endothelium activation in patients with acute TTP. The finding that CT-proET-1 levels decreased in remission compared with the acute phase further supports endothelial involvement. In addition, we show that endothelial activation also correlated with the activation of the alternative complement pathway. The data suggest that complement and endothelium activation jointly contribute to the development of TTP episodes in patients with predisposition to TTP

Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban can be an alternative to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism is unclear. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, we randomly assigned patients with acute venous thromboembolism, who had initially received heparin, to receive edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily, or 30 mg once daily (e.g., in the case of patients with creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute or a body weight below 60 kg), or to receive warfarin. Patients received the study drug for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4921 patients presented with deep-vein thrombosis, and 3319 with a pulmonary embolism. Among patients receiving warfarin, the time in the therapeutic range was 63.5%. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy outcome, which occurred in 130 patients in the edoxaban group (3.2%) and 146 patients in the warfarin group (3.5%) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.13; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The safety outcome occurred in 349 patients (8.5%) in the edoxaban group and 423 patients (10.3%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P=0.004 for superiority). The rates of other adverse events were similar in the two groups. A total of 938 patients with pulmonary embolism had right ventricular dysfunction, as assessed by measurement of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels; the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism in this subgroup was 3.3% in the edoxaban group and 6.2% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Edoxaban administered once daily after initial treatment with heparin was noninferior to high-quality standard therapy and caused significantly less bleeding in a broad spectrum of patients with venous thromboembolism, including those with severe pulmonary embolism. (Funded by Daiichi-Sankyo; Hokusai-VTE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00986154.)

Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=−4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events