Police powers in Hong Kong: problems and prospects

Includes bibliographical references.published_or_final_versionPolice powers: a police view Hodson, D.M. Hodson, D.M. 121Police powers to stop, search and detain: recent developments and anomalies Heilbronn, Gary N. Heilbronn, Gary N. 99Street-level justice: police discretion and the rule of law Gaylord, Mark S. Gatlord, Mark S. Traver, Harold Traver, Harold 68The police, professional privilege and the Bill of Rights Aitken, Lee Aitken, Lee 43Legalistic and service styles of policing: can they co- exist? Bar-On, Arnon A. Bar-On, Arnon A. 11Introduction Wacks, Raymond Wacks, Raymond 1Contributors i

Hong Kong's bill of rights: problems and prospects

A seminar held at the University of Hong Kong on 31 March 1990.published_or_final_versionInternational human rights law and domestic Hong Kong law Mushkat, Roda Mushkat, Roda 25The bill of rights: some basic constitutional considerations Dykes, P.J. Dykes, P.J. 19The iceman cometh? The government's proposal for a frozen bill of rights Byrnes, Andrew Byrnes, Andrew 49Implementing the bill of rights: three modest proposals. Or taking the bill of rights seriously Clark, David Clark, David 79Introduction Wacks, Raymond 1Enforcement of the bill of rights Chen, Albert Chen, Albert 69Seminar programme 95Entrenchment of the bill of rights Wesley-Smith, Peter Wesley-Smith, Peter 59The content of the bill of rights Jayawickrama, Nihal Jayawickrama, Nihal 39Bills of rights: comparative perspectives Ghai, Yash Ghai, Yash

Private Facts: Is Naomi Campbell a Good Model?

This article analyses the implications of the Naomi Campbell case for the protection of privacy and the long gestation process of a common law privacy tort

Jurisprudence, 4th.ed/ Wacks

ix, 268 hal.: tab.; 21 cm

Jurisprudence, 4th.ed/ Wacks

ix, 268 hal.: tab.; 21 cm

Broadcasting Privacy

Historically, telecommunications and broadcasting have been seen as distinct activities; so too the way they each engage privacy concerns. Telecommunications, with its private content and identifiable participants, falls within the sphere of privacy; broadcasting consumption has traditionally fallen at the other end of the scale, characterised as both public and anonymous. The article examines the extent to which an individual's interaction with broadcasting systems is treated differently from their use of other forms of electronic communications in privacy terms. It argues that some legacy rules and outmoded assumptions about the nature of broadcasting mean that the privacy implications of the process of its consumption have not been fully considered or adequately addressed in law