Integral mean estimates for the polar derivative of a polynomial

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial of degree $n$ having all zeros in $|z|\leq k$ where $k\leq 1,$ then it was proved by Dewan \textit{et al} that for every real or complex number $\alpha$ with $|\alpha|\geq k$ and each $r\geq 0$ $$n(|\alpha|-k)\left\{\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\left|P\left(e^{i\theta}\right)\right|^r d\theta\right\}^{\frac{1}{r}}\leq\left\{\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\left|1+ke^{i\theta}\right|^r d\theta\right\}^{\frac{1}{r}}\underset{|z|=1}{Max}|D_\alpha P(z)|.$$ \indent In this paper, we shall present a refinement and generalization of above result and also extend it to the class of polynomials $P(z)=a_nz^n+\sum_{\nu=\mu}^{n}a_{n-\nu}z^{n-\nu},$ $1\leq\mu\leq n,$ having all its zeros in $|z|\leq k$ where $k\leq 1$ and thereby obtain certain generalizations of above and many other known results.Comment: 8 page

New Generalizations of Exponential Distribution with Applications

The main purpose of this paper is to present k-Generalized Exponential Distribution which among other things includes Generalized Exponential and Weibull Distributions as special cases. Besides, we also obtain three-parameter extension of Generalized Exponential Distribution. We shall also discuss moment generating functions (MGFs) of these newly introduced distributions

Lp mean estimates for an operator preserving inequalities between polynomials

If $P(z)$ be a polynomial of degree at most $n$ which does not vanish in $|z| < 1$, it was recently formulated by Shah and Liman \cite[\textit{Integral estimates for the family of $B$-operators, Operators and Matrices,} \textbf{5}(2011), 79 - 87]{wl} that for every $R\geq 1$, $p\geq 1$, $$\left\|B[P\circ\sigma](z)\right\|_p \leq\frac{R^{n}|\Lambda_n|+|\lambda_{0}|}{\left\|1+z\right\|_p}\left\|P(z)\right\|_p,$$ where $B$ is a $\mathcal{B}_{n}$-operator with parameters $\lambda_{0}, \lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}$ in the sense of Rahman \cite{qir}, $\sigma(z)=Rz$ and $\Lambda_n=\lambda_{0}+\lambda_{1}\frac{n^{2}}{2} +\lambda_{2}\frac{n^{3}(n-1)}{8}$. Unfortunately the proof of this result is not correct. In this paper, we present a more general sharp $L_p$-inequalities for $\mathcal{B}_{n}$-operators which not only provide a correct proof of the above inequality as a special case but also extend them for $0 \leq p <1$ as well.Comment: 16 Page