A comparative evaluation of effect of intravenous premedication with ondansetron versus granisetron on hemodynamics and sensory-motor blockade produced by intrathecal hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine

Background: Bezold Jarisch reflex is important cause of hypotension and bradycardia which occur after spinal anaesthesia. This reflex is elicited by stimulation of peripheral serotonin receptors 5- hydroxytryptamine (5- HT3 type). These receptors have antinociceptive effect, which is confirmed by many studies.The two most commonly used 5HT3 antagonist are ondansetron and granisetrone. Very few comparative studies of the two drugs on the effect after spinal anaesthesia are available.Methods: Ninety adulted patients of either sex aged 18-58 years scheduled for elective infraumbilical surgeries were randomly allocated in three groups to receive intravenous ondansetron 4mg, granisetrone 2mg or normal saline in equal volume 5mins before spinal anesthesia. Hemodynamic changes and time to sensory motor onset and regression were evaluated.Results: There was statistically significant difference in fall of systolic diastolic and mean blood pressure among the three groups. Time to two segment regression of sensory block and time to regression to S1 was faster in ondansentron (76.6±17.2mins, 176±22mins) and granisetrone group (69±17.3mins, 165±19.2mins) in comparision to control group(77.4±24.3mins, 178±21mins) which was statistically significant also p value-0.019, 0.0001 respectively.Conclusions: The prophylactic therapy with 4mg i.v. ondansetron, given five minutes before spinal anaesthesia appears to be significantly most effective and safe for attenuating haemodynamic response after spinal anaesthesia without affecting the duration of sensory block in patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries

Comparison of hemodynamic responses of intravenous dexmedetomidine and esmolol infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the commonest surgery performed under general anesthesia in this set up but maintaining the hemodynamic stability is challenging in these patients. The present study was conducted to comparatively analyse the hemodynamic variations using intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous esmolol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: Study was conducted on 90 adult patients aged 18-60 years, of ASA grade I or II of both gender, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Patients of Group A received esmolol infusion (loading: 1mg/kg and maintenance: 5-15µg/kg/min), patients of Group B received dexmedetomedine infusion (loading: 0.7µg/kg and maintenance: 0.4µg/kg/hr) and Group C (control group) received normal saline infusion. Patients were monitored for changes in heart rate, ECG, systemic blood pressure and EtCO2, at baseline, at 5 min and 10 min after giving study drug bolus, after induction, intubation, skin incision and CO2 insufflation. Thereafter, these changes were recorded at 15 min intervals till the end of surgery.Results: It was observed that perioperative use of dexmedetomidine and esmolol infusions maintained better hemodynamic stability as compared to the normal saline in control group. Though the patients in esmolol group showed less fluctuations in BP and HR (as compared to control group), but, stability was better in the patients of dexmedetomidine group at all-time intervals.Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine infusion was a better option for maintaining hemodynamic stability in comparison to emolol infusion during laparoscopic surgeries

Comparison of postoperative analgesia and sedation responses of intravenous dexmedetomidine and esmolol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: Although, the concept of laparoscopic surgeries has revolutionised the surgical practice and has markedly reduced the incidence of complications especially postoperative pain. However, the menace of postoperative pain still remains challenge, especially in first 24 hours. The present study was conducted to comparatively analyse the postoperative pain and sedation using intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous esmolol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: Study was conducted on 90 adult patients aged 18-60 years of ASA grade I or II of both genders, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Patients of group A received esmolol infusion (loading: 1 mg/kg and maintenance: 5-15 µg/kg/min), patients of group B received dexmedetomidine infusion (loading: 0.7 µg/kg and maintenance: 0.4 µg/kg/hour) and group C (control group) received normal saline infusion. During the post-operative period of 24 hours, patient were monitored for sedation using Ramsay sedation score like pain, using visual analogue score (VAS), incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting and use of any drug for pain, vomiting and any other side effect.Results: Frequency of pain was highest in group C at all post periods, followed by group A and was least in group B. The mean sedation score of group B was comparatively higher as compared to both group C and group A.Conclusions: The inference authors drew was that dexmedetomidine is better analgesic with aurousable sedation

A comparative study of granisetrone, dexamethasone and combination of granisetrone-dexamethasone as prophylaxis for postoperative nausea vomiting during laparoscopic surgeries

Background: In laparoscopic surgeries, insufflation with carbon dioxide triggers vagal afferents on the bowel and peritoneum which induces emesis by activating the vomiting center. It is hypothesized that combined antiemetics with different sites of activity would be more effective than one drug alone for the prophylaxis against PONV. So, the present study was planned to compare the efficacy of granisetron, dexamethasone and combination of granisetron with dexamethasone to prevent PONV.Methods: This randomized prospective double-blind study was performed on 120 patients, aged between 18 and 58 years of ASA physical status I and II of either sex undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized in three groups, group I (granisetrone 2 mg I.V.), group II (dexamethasone) 8 mg I.V., group III (granisetrone+dexamethasone) 2 mg+8 mg I.V. with 40 patients in each group. Complete response, incidence of nausea, vomiting, and rescue antiemetic were recorded at specified intervals.Results: A complete response (defined as no PONV and no need for another rescue antiemetic) was achieved in 75% of the patients given granisetron, 70% in dexamethasone and in 92.5% of the patients given granisetron plus dexamethasone (P <0.05). The overall cumulative incidences (0-24 hours) of PONV were 10 (25%) in the granisetron, 12 (30%) in the dexamethasone and 3 (7.5%) in the combination group. No difference in adverse events were observed in any of the groups.Conclusions: The prophylactic therapy of granisetron 2 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg just before induction of anaesthesia is significantly effective in prevention of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries

Clinical efficacy of Esmolol, Lignocaine and Diltiazem as premedicant for attenuation of hemodynamic responses of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation- a comparative evaluation

Background: Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation after induction of anesthesia is almost always associated with hemodynamic stress response. The aim of this study was to compare esmolol, lignocaine and diltiazem for suppression of laryngoscopy and intubation response.Methods: This randomized prospective double-blind control study was performed on 120 patients of either sex, aged between 18 and 58 years of ASA physical status I and II with Mallampatti grade I and II, undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Patients were randomized in four groups, Group N (normal saline), Group E (esmolol) 1.5mg/kg I.V, Group D (diltiazem) 0.2mg/kg I.V, and Group L (lignocaine) 1.5mg/kg I.V with 30 patients in each group. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded during the basal period, preinduction, during intubation and at specified intervals.Results: There was significant increase in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and heart rate in the control group (Group N) in association with tracheal intubation. The heart rate was significantly lower in Group E (Esmolol group), followed by Group D (Diltiazem group) and Group L (Lignocaine group). Rate pressure product was significantly lower in group E as compared to other groups, followed by group D and group L. Maximum increase in rate pressure product (RPP) just after laryngoscopy and intubation was ±74.29% in group N, ±16.11% in group E, 25.38% in group D and 38.77%in group L.Conclusions: Esmolol was better than diltiazem and they both were better than lignocaine for preventing the hemodynamic response after laryngoscopy and intubation

Comparison of hemodynamic responses along with perfusion index to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes

Background: The McCoy Laryngoscope in comparison to macintosh laryngoscope requires less force for performing laryngoscopy and as a result may alter the associated hemodynamic response. Perfusion index (PI) is a noninvasive numerical value of peripheral perfusion obtained from a pulse oximeter.Methods: A randomized prospective single blind comparative clinical study was conducted on 80 patients of ASA physical status I-II aged between 18 years to 58 years of either sex with body mass index (B.M.I) between 20 and 25 undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia. 80 patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (n=40)- Tracheal Intubation with Macintosh Laryngoscope, Group B (n=40)-Tracheal Intubation with McCoy Laryngoscope. Blood Pressure (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure) and heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2) via pulse oximeter were monitored.Results: The demographic profile showed no significant difference between the groups. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure had highly significant difference in both groups. Perfusion index was statistically significant immediately post laryngoscopy and intubation till 4 mins. Immediately after laryngoscopy and intubation, the correlation between PI and MAP was statistically significant and it was a negative average to good correlation.Conclusions: The McCoy laryngoscope elicits lesser haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation as compared to Macintosh laryngoscope in normotensive patients. Perfusion index can also serve as an additional parameter to assess hemodynamic response since it has good negative correlation with the mean arterial pressure

Comparison of hemodynamic responses of intravenous dexmedetomidine and esmolol infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the commonest surgery performed under general anesthesia in this set up but maintaining the hemodynamic stability is challenging in these patients. The present study was conducted to comparatively analyse the hemodynamic variations using intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous esmolol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: Study was conducted on 90 adult patients aged 18-60 years, of ASA grade I or II of both gender, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Patients of Group A received esmolol infusion (loading: 1mg/kg and maintenance: 5-15µg/kg/min), patients of Group B received dexmedetomedine infusion (loading: 0.7µg/kg and maintenance: 0.4µg/kg/hr) and Group C (control group) received normal saline infusion. Patients were monitored for changes in heart rate, ECG, systemic blood pressure and EtCO2, at baseline, at 5 min and 10 min after giving study drug bolus, after induction, intubation, skin incision and CO2 insufflation. Thereafter, these changes were recorded at 15 min intervals till the end of surgery.Results: It was observed that perioperative use of dexmedetomidine and esmolol infusions maintained better hemodynamic stability as compared to the normal saline in control group. Though the patients in esmolol group showed less fluctuations in BP and HR (as compared to control group), but, stability was better in the patients of dexmedetomidine group at all-time intervals.Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine infusion was a better option for maintaining hemodynamic stability in comparison to emolol infusion during laparoscopic surgeries

Postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy by preemptive use of intravenous paracetamol or ketorolac: A comparative study

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with postoperative pain due operative ports site and residual intraperitoneal gas CO 2 . Preemptive analgesia is one of the promising strategies of postoperative pain relief. The present study is undertaken to compare the efficacy of preemptive intravenous paracetamol versus ketorolac for post operative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method: Ninety adult consented patients 18-58 yr of age, of either sex, of ASA grade I/II were randomized into two equal groups of 45 patients each. Patients of group I received infusion of paracetamol 1 g and group II received infusion of ketorolac 30 mg, 30 minutes before the induction of general anaesthesia. Postoperative pain was evaluated by standard 10 cm linear visual analogue scale at different time intervals. When VAS was more than 3 rescue analgesic 50 mg tramadol intravenously stat was given. Intraoperative hemodynamic and any side effects were also recorded for statistical analysis. Results: Demographic profile and hemodynamic parameters i.e intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were comparable in both the groups. Post operative VAS scores were persistently higher in paracetamol group with statistically significant difference (P value < 0.05). All 45 patients in paracetamol group and 8 patients in ketorolac group required rescue analgesic within 6 hrs of study time. Total tramadol consumption was much higher (2250 mg) in paracetamol group as compared to 400 mg in ketorolac group. Conclusion: Preemptive use of ketorolac exerted superior postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison to paracetamol without any significant side effect

Intrathecal nalbuphine versus intrathecal fentanyl as adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery of lower limbs under subarachnoid block: A comparative evaluation

Background: Subarachnoid block (SAB) possesses many benefits with a drawback of short duration of anesthetic action. Intrathecal opioids have been used to enhance the clinical efficiency and duration of action of local anesthetic drugs. The present study was aimed to compare the clinical efficiency of intrathecal fentanyl with nalbuphine as adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery of lower limbs. Patients and Methods: Sixty-eight adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I and II of both gender aged 25-65 years were randomized into two groups of 34 each to receive either fentanyl 25 μg (Group I) or nalbuphine 2 mg (Group II) with 3.5 mL 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, making intrathecal drug volume to 4 mL in each group. Sensory and motor block characteristics and time to first rescue analgesic (intravenous tramadol 100 mg) were recorded as the primary end points. Drug-related side effects of pruritus, nausea/vomiting, and respiratory depression were recorded as the secondary outcomes. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding the onset and cephalic extension of block. The time to two dermatome regressions and time for complete motor recovery were significantly prolonged in patients of Group II with statistical significant difference (P < 0.05). Duration of analgesia was also extended in patients of Group II (378.0 ± 35.72 min) as compared to Group I (234.0 ± 24.10 min) with highly significant difference (P < 0.001). No drug-related side effects were observed in either group. Conclusion: Intrathecal nalbuphine 2 mg as adjuvant to 0.5% bupivacaine was clinically more efficient than fentanyl for enhancing the postoperative analgesia

Nalbuphine as an adjuvant to 0.5% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade

Background: Brachial plexus block is a reliable, regional anesthetic technique for upper arm surgeries. Opioid agonist-antagonists are also used as adjuvant to enhance the analgesia of bupivacaine. The present study was aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine as an adjuvant to 0.5% bupivacaine for brachial plexus block. Patients and Methods: Sixty adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II of both genders were randomized into two groups of thirty patients each to receive either 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1 mL of normal saline (Group 1) or 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1 mL of nalbuphine 10 mg (Group 2) for brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance. Patients were observed for onset and duration of sensory and motor block with duration of pain relief as primary end points while occurrence of any adverse effect due to technique or nalbuphine was noted as secondary outcome. Results: The ultrasound guided the visualization of the nerves, needle, and spread of local anesthetic at brachial plexus block site. Nalbuphine did not affect the onset time of block but enhanced the duration of sensory and motor block. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 481.53 ± 42.45 min in Group 2 and 341.31 ± 21.42 min in Group 1, with statistically highly significant difference (P < 0.001). There were no hemodynamic variations and no complication of technique or adverse effects due to nalbuphine occurred. Conclusion: Nalbuphine 10 mg has significantly extended the duration of analgesia of brachial plexus block with no adverse effects