41 research outputs found
Subjective and Objective Outcomes in Patients With COPD After Pulmonary Rehabilitation – The Impact of Comorbidities
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with multiple systemic manifestations and comorbidities, which contribute independently to its total morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary rehabilitation is an evidence-based intervention that is indicated for COPD patients who remain symptomatic, despite optimal pharmacological therapy. Although it is well documented in pure COPD, the role of pulmonary rehabilitation is uncertain in coexisting comorbidities. The aim of the present study was to clarify the effect of a pulmonary rehabilitation program in COPD patients with concomitant comorbidities.Methods: Thirty two patients with COPD were evaluated before and after a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program, in terms of dyspnea, quality of life (QOL), pulmonary function tests and exercise capacity. The patients were also divided into two groups, according to the presence or the absence of comorbidities. Patients with none or only one comorbidity (Group 1, n = 11) were compared to those who had two or more comorbidities (Group 2, n = 21).Results: All patients significantly improved in dyspnea, as expressed by modified Medical Research Council scale and the COPD assessment Test (p < 0.001), QOL as assessed by the St. George respiratory questionnaire (p < 0.001) and exercise tolerance in six minute walking test (p < 0.001). Peak oxygen uptake relatively increased and body mass decreased in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD seems to be beneficial for all patients, independently of the presence, the number or the nature of their comorbidities. Thus, the presence of comorbidities must not represent an exclusion criterion for patients that are referred to pulmonary rehabilitation programs.Trial Registration: Current controlled trials ISRCTN14648515 Retrospectively registered 15 February 2018
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Eye Metastasis: Disease Relapse or a New Entity?
Lung cancer is still diagnosed during the advanced stage of the disease and most patients do not have the opportunity for surgical treatment, despite the new diagnostic equipment that has been made available in recent years, such as the radial and linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and electromagnetic fiberoptic bronchoscopy. However, novel targeted therapies with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy are available. In this commentary, we will focus on eye metastasis after initiation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors due to epidermal growth factor mutation of lung cancer adenocarcinoma.Â
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Eye Metastasis: Disease Relapse or a New Entity?
Lung cancer is still diagnosed during the advanced stage of the disease and most patients do not have the opportunity for surgical treatment, despite the new diagnostic equipment that has been made available in recent years, such as the radial and linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and electromagnetic fiberoptic bronchoscopy. However, novel targeted therapies with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy are available. In this commentary, we will focus on eye metastasis after initiation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors due to epidermal growth factor mutation of lung cancer adenocarcinoma.
Lung Cancer and Eye Metastases
It has been observed that lung cancer either non-small cell or small cell is responsible for eye metastases. This form of metastases in several cases was the first manifestation of the disease and further investigation led to the diagnosis of the underlying malignancy. Both types of lung cancer are equally responsible for this demonstration. Furthermore; both chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown equal positive results in treating the exophalmos manifestation. Up to date information will be presented in our current work
Η επίδραση της θρέψης στην αναπνευστική λειτουργία υπολειμματικών σε βάρος εμφυσηματικών ασθενών
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of nutritional depletion on indices of pulmonary function. Thirty stable malnourished patients with emphysema were studied. We measured: body weihgt, height, TSF, MAMC, PIMAX, PEMAX, FEV, FVC,RV,TLC,DLCO. All patients received a special diet of 1250 Kcal greater than their energy requirements, conteining 18%proteins, 50% carbohydrate and 32% fat. Measurements were repeated after one month. All patients increased the mean values of their body weight,TSF, MAMC and the percent of ideal body weight(P<0.001). They also increased their PIMAX and PEMAX(P<0.001). There was a significant improvement in FEV1,FVC and DLCO(P<0.001). We conclude that hyperalimentation improves the nutricional status and lung function in malnourished emphysematic patients. Including the strenght of respiratory muscles
Subjective and Objective Outcomes in Patients With COPD After Pulmonary Rehabilitation - The Impact of Comorbidities
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with multiple systemic manifestations and comorbidities, which contribute independently to its total morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary rehabilitation is an evidence-based intervention that is indicated for COPD patients who remain symptomatic, despite optimal pharmacological therapy. Although it is well documented in pure COPD, the role of pulmonary rehabilitation is uncertain in coexisting comorbidities. The aim of the present study was to clarify the effect of a pulmonary rehabilitation program in COPD patients with concomitant comorbidities. Thirty two patients with COPD were evaluated before and after a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program, in terms of dyspnea, quality of life (QOL), pulmonary function tests and exercise capacity. The patients were also divided into two groups, according to the presence or the absence of comorbidities. Patients with none or only one comorbidity (Group 1, = 11) were compared to those who had two or more comorbidities (Group 2, = 21). All patients significantly improved in dyspnea, as expressed by modified Medical Research Council scale and the COPD assessment Test ( < 0.001), QOL as assessed by the St. George respiratory questionnaire ( < 0.001) and exercise tolerance in six minute walking test ( < 0.001). Peak oxygen uptake relatively increased and body mass decreased in Group 1 compared to Group 2 ( < 0.05). Pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD seems to be beneficial for all patients, independently of the presence, the number or the nature of their comorbidities. Thus, the presence of comorbidities must not represent an exclusion criterion for patients that are referred to pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Current controlled trials ISRCTN14648515 Retrospectively registered 15 February 2018
Carboplatin Plus Pemetrexed as First-line Treatment of Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Phase II Study
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rapidly
progressive tumor that is increasing in frequency worldwide. Treatment
options are limited, and response to chemotherapy is poor. The aim of
this phase 11 study was to evaluate the activity of the
carboplatin/pemetrexed combination as first-line chemotherapy in
patients with unresectable MPM. Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy-naive
patients with histologically confirmed MPM and an Eastern Cooperative
Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were enrolled. Treatment
consisted of pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the
concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL/min, both administered on day 1 of a
21-day cycle. The treatment continued until 6 cycles were completed or
until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression were observed.
Results: A total of 62 patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 18
(29%) had a confirmed partial response, whereas the disease remained
stable in 34 patients (54.9%) and progressed in 10 patients (16.1%).
The median overall survival (OS) was estimated at 14 months (95% CI,
11.8-16.2 months), and the median time to progression was 7 months (95%
Cl, 5.8-8.2 months). The difference in median OS between the epithelial
histologic subtype (16 months) and the sarcomatoid subtype (11 months)
was statistically significant. Conclusion: This study confirmed the
activity of the carboplatin/pemetrexed combination in the first-line
treatment of patients with MPM. It is a viable option, especially in
cases in which side effects are generally anticipated