15 research outputs found

    Are women better mindreaders? Sex differences in neural correlates of mentalizing detected with functional MRI

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to mentalize, i.e. develop a Theory of Mind (ToM), enables us to anticipate and build a model of the thoughts, emotions and intentions of others. It has long been hypothesised that women differ from men in their mentalizing abilities. In the present fMRI study we examined the impact of (1) gender (women vs. men) and (2) game partner (human vs. computer) on ToM associated neural activity in the medial prefrontal cortex. Groups of men (n = 12) and women (n = 12) interacted in an iterated classical prisoner's dilemma forced choice situation with alleged human and computer partners who were outside the scanner.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both the conditions of playing against putative human as well as computer partners led to activity increases in mPFC, ACC and rTPJ, constituting the classic ToM network. However, mPFC/ACC activity was more pronounced when participants believed they were playing against the alleged human partner. Differences in the medial frontal lobe activation related to the sex of the participants could be demonstrated for the human partner > computer partner contrast.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our data demonstrate differences in medial prefrontal brain activation during a ToM task depending on both the gender of participants and the game partner.</p

    Review of A survey of the field of social psychiatry.

    No full text

    Review of Tough times and tender moments in child care work.

    No full text

    A Conceptual Framework.

    No full text

    FLUOXETINE IN THE TREATMENT OF SELF-MUTILATING BEHAVIOR

    No full text

    Ipilimumab in Pretreated Patients With Advanced Malignant Melanoma: Results of the South African Expanded-Access Program

    No full text
    Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate 1- and 2-year survival rates and durable remissions in pretreated patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) malignant melanoma treated with ipilimumab in a South African expanded-access program (SA-EAP). Patients and Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study obtained data from pretreated patients with advanced malignant melanoma who were eligible for the ipilimumab SA-EAP. Ipilimumab was administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles to adults with advanced melanoma for whom at least one line of treatment for metastatic disease had failed. Data from the medical records of 108 patients treated within the SA-EAP were collected and statistically analyzed to determine overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 and 2 years. Results: In the population of 108 patients, a median OS of 8.98 months (95% CI, 7.47 to 10.79 months) was observed. One-year OS was 36% (95% CI, 26% to 45%), and 2-year survival was observed as 20% (95% CI, 12% to 27%). The median survival without progression (ie, PFS) was 3.44 months (95% CI, 2.98 to 4.16 months), and 1- and 2-year PFS were 22% (95% CI, 14% to 29%) and 14% (95% CI, 8% to 21%), respectively. The longest recorded survival was 3.4 years. No independent prognostic variables were identified to predict for OS by multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Conclusion: In this multicenter South African setting, ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg/kg was an effective treatment with long-term OS in a subset of patients with pretreated advanced malignant melanoma
    corecore