Surgical Outcome of Low-Power-Density Blue Laser for Vascular Lesions of the Vocal Fold.

Photoangiolytic lasers such as the 532-nm potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) and the novel 445-nm blue laser (introduced into the United States in 2020) are absorbed selectively by hemoglobin, permitting targeted ablation of vascular structures such as vascular malformations of the vocal fold (VF). Previously, we reported the high rate of success of KTP laser photocoagulation for VF vascular lesions. Compared with other photoangiolytic lasers, blue laser has the highest absorption in hemoglobin, and therefore it can be operated at lower power densities to minimize thermal injury to adjacent tissue. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of blue laser for treatment of VF vascular lesions using low power densities, and to compare outcomes of blue laser with those of KTP laser. METHODS: Adult voice patients who underwent blue laser treatment of VF vascular lesions in the operating room at the lowest power densities that appeared clinically to cause the effect desired were included in this retrospective study. Baseline lesion characteristics and postoperative outcomes were assessed with a model that we had described previously. Postoperative outcomes were compared to those of previously reported KTP laser. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects (54 VFs treated) underwent blue laser vaporization of VF vascular lesions (average age was 40.63 ± 17.51). Data were compared to those of 66 subjects (100 VFs) who had undergone KTP laser vaporization of VF vascular lesions. There were no significant differences in subject demographics, past medical or surgical history, or preoperative location or severity of vascular lesions. Surgical success for blue laser at the low power densities used was 3.74 ± 0.50, 3.55 ± 0.94, 3.90 ± 0.94, and 3.70 ± 1.11 (out of 5) at postoperative visits 1-4, respectively. Surgical objective score was significantly greater following KTP laser at every postoperative visit. Treatment with KTP laser resulted in significantly greater generalized postoperative edema, and blue laser resulted in significantly greater localized edema at postoperative visits one and two. At visit three and four, there are no significant differences. VF stiffness following blue laser was 2.41 ± 0.67, 1.91 ± 0.69, 1.33 ± 0.47, and 1.10 ± 0.18 (out of 4) at postoperative visits 1-4, respectively. Postoperative VF stiffness did not differ significantly from KTP laser. Postoperative hemorrhage severity after blue laser was 1.79 ± 0.54, 1.59 ± 0.48, 1.15 ± 0.25, and 1.14 ± 0.26 (out of 4) at postoperative visits 1-4, respectively. Blue laser resulted in significantly less VF hemorrhage than KTP laser at the first (1.79 ± 0.54 versus 2.26 ± 0.83) and second (1.59 ± 0.48 versus 1.98 ± 0.72) postoperative visits. Vascular lesions treated with low-power-density blue laser were significantly more likely to recur than those treated with KTP laser (40.74% versus 10.00%). New vascular malformations were significantly more likely to form after blue laser than KTP (24.07% versus 6.00%). Subjects treated with low-power-density blue laser were significantly more likely to undergo repeat surgery than those treated with KTP (31.48% versus 14.00%). Significant predictors for the need for repeat blue laser included lesion recurrence, a lower surgical objective score at the third or fourth postoperative visit and a higher baseline lesion severity grade. CONCLUSION: Blue laser is an effective tool for the surgical management of VF vascular lesions. Although overall surgical success ratings were inferior to KTP laser at the power densities used, the severity of postoperative edema and VF hemorrhage were significantly less with blue laser. Re-evaluation of blue laser using higher power densities is in progress

5-Fluorouracil for Treatment of Vocal Fold Scar.

BACKGROUND: Vocal fold (VF) scar can result from trauma, neoplasm, inflammatory processes, congenital causes, surgery and other etiologies. In general, once the vibratory margin of the VF has been scarred, it has not been possible to return VF function to normal; but often it can be improved. The drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a pyrimidine antimetabolic that has many clinical applications ranging from systemic chemotherapy to topical treatment of actinic keratosis and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Local injection with 5-FU also has been used for hypertrophic scar and keloids. 5-FU was shown to have benefit in animal models of VF scar and subglottic stenosis. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of 5-FU injection on VF vibratory function in patients with VF scar. Outcomes of 5-FU injection were compared to controls injected with dexamethasone. METHODS: Adult voice center patients who had undergone VF injection with dexamethasone or a series of three 5-FU injections for treatment of VF scar were included in the study. Postoperative outcomes included percentage of subjects demonstrating improvement after injection, change in scar size, glottic closure, and VF stiffness, as well as digital image analysis measurements of mucosal wave. Outcomes were compared between subjects who received 5-FU and those who received dexamethasone. RESULTS: There were 58 VFs injected with 5-FU and 58 historical controls injected with dexamethasone. Baseline subject characteristics and etiology of scar did not differ significantly between the 5-FU and dexamethasone cohorts, except that scar size was greater in the 5-FU group and mucosal wave was worse at baseline. After a series of three 5-FU injections, 61.22% improved, 8.16% demonstrated no change, and 30.61% worsened. In the dexamethasone cohort, 51.06% improved, 0.00% demonstrated no change, and 48.94% worsened. The response differed significantly between the 5-FU and dexamethasone cohorts, with a greater proportion of subjects who underwent 5-FU injection demonstrating improvement postoperatively. In the 5-FU cohort, 32.76% of subjects previously had undergone and failed dexamethasone injection for VF scar: and within that group 84.21% improved, 5.26% demonstrated no change, and 10.53% worsened following 5-FU injection. On digital image analysis, the percent improvement in postoperative mucosal wave was significantly greater in the 5-FU cohort compared to the dexamethasone group, which demonstrated a worsening of mucosal wave. CONCLUSIONS: A series of three intralesional injections with 5-FU outperformed dexamethasone for improving mucosal wave in patients with VF scar. A prior failed trial of dexamethasone injection predicted a favorable response to 5-FU. Further research is encouraged to confirm or refute these findings

Gluten Sensitivity Underlying Resistant Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms and Signs.

INTRODUCTION: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is one of the most common conditions encountered in otolaryngology. Gluten sensitivity may mimic the signs and symptoms of LPR or act as an aggravating cofactor with LPR. Gluten sensitivity and food intolerance also have been implicated as conditions that may be associated specifically with LPR symptoms and signs resistant to traditional medical treatment. Medical management of LPR may be insufficient to control symptoms and laryngeal signs of reflux, constituting resistant LPR. Eliminating gluten from the diet could provide symptomatic relief to patients with gluten sensitivity and LPR that is not controlled adequately by current regimens. The purpose of our study was to investigate the relationship between gluten sensitivity and LPR. We aimed to evaluate reflux finding score (RFS) improvement following elimination of gluten from the diet in patients with resistant LPR who had positive blood tests associated with gluten sensitivity. Symptom improvement was also assessed following dietary gluten elimination. Lastly, we aimed to identify predictors for a positive response to a gluten-free diet. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent gluten sensitivity testing for treatment-resistant LPR symptoms and/or signs were included. Patients with ≥1 positive test were advised to begin a therapeutic trial of a gluten-free diet. Subjects who chose not to trial a gluten-free diet or tested negative for gluten sensitivity markers served as controls. RFS was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven patients were included; 81 trialed a gluten-free diet. Subjects who trialed the gluten-free diet were significantly more likely to demonstrate objective improvement in RFS (77.14% vs 43.88%), and report subjective improvement (55.41% vs 25.77%) than those who did not. RFS had decreased significantly from baseline at 1-3, 3-6, 6-12, and \u3e12-month interval follow-up examinations in subjects who trialed a gluten-free diet. Comparison between subjects who trialed the gluten-free diet, tested positive for a gluten sensitivity marker but did not trial the gluten-free diet, and subjects who were negative for all gluten sensitivity markers revealed that a gluten-free diet was associated with a significantly greater percent improvement in RFS compared to controls at 1-3, 6-12, and \u3e12-months. CONCLUSION: Gluten sensitivity can mimic or aggravate LPR. A gluten-free diet should be considered for patients with resistant LPR, especially if blood test abnormalities that suggest gluten sensitivity are identified. The diet should be maintained for a minimum of three months to demonstrate objective improvement using RFS