3 research outputs found

    Dexmedetomidine versus labetalol infusions for controlling emergence hypertension in cranial surgeries for supratentorial tumors

    Get PDF
    Background: Acute hypertension is a common accompaniment during emergence from anesthesia especially in intracranial neurosurgical procedures and may be associated with the development of intracranial hematoma. Although various drugs have been evaluated, management of emergence hypertension in this subset of patients continues to be a challenge for anesthesiologists. Methodology: Seventy-five patients ASA (I-II) scheduled for supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of three groups at the time of dural closure: Group “dex” received dexmedetomidine infusion in a rate of 1 μg/kg/hr, Group “labetalol” received labetalol infusion in a rate of 0.5 mg/kg/hr, and Group “control” a control group where patients received saline infusion at the same rate of dexmedetomidine and labetalol. Hypertensive episodes were managed with nitroglycerin at a dose starting from 1 μg/kg/min if systolic blood pressure exceeded 25% of its preinduction value. Hemodynamic parameters as well as the number of patients, the total dose of nitroglycerin required in each group and the time to extubation were recorded. Results: Dexmedetomidine and labetalol had a significant effect in reducing SBP, MAP, DBP, HR during emergence from anesthesia, with more reduction of the SBP, MAP and DBP in the dexmedetomidine group and of the HR in the labetalol group in comparison with the other two groups. The number of patients needing nitroglycerin was 8 representing 32% of patients in dexmedetomidine group, 5 representing 20% of patients in labetalol group and 22 representing 88% of patients in control group (P value = 0.032). Time to emergence from anesthesia was comparable in the three groups. Conclusion: Both dexmedetomidine and labetalol had favorable effects on hemodynamics at time of emergence from anesthesia in comparison with control group without prolongation of the time of extubation

    Safety and efficacy of addition of hyaluronidase to a mixture of lidocaine and bupivacaine in scalp nerves block in elective craniotomy operations; comparative study

    No full text
    Abstract Background Patients undergoing craniotomy operations are prone to various noxious stimuli, many strategies are commenced to provide state of analgesia, for better control of the stress response and to overcome its undesired effects on the haemodynamics and post-operative pain. Scalp nerves block are considered one of these strategies. This study was conceived to evaluate the effect of addition of hyaluronidase to the local anaesthetic mixture used in the scalp nerves block in patients undergoing elective craniotomy operations. Methods 64 patients undergoing elective craniotomy operations were enrolled in this prospective randomized, double-blind comparative study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group LA, patients subjected to scalp nerves block with 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, 15 ml lidocaine 2%, in 1:400000 epinephrine. Group H as Group LA with15 IU /ml Hyaluronidase. Results Patients in the H group showed lower VAS values for 8 h postoperative, compared to the LA group. The haemodynamic response showed lower values in the H group, compared to the LA group. Those effects were shown in the intraoperative period and for 6 h post-operative. No difference was detected regarding the incidence of complications nor the safety profile. Conclusion Our data supports the idea that addition of hyaluronidase to the local anesthetic mixture improves the success rates of the scalp nerves block and its efficacy especially during stressful intraoperative periods and in the early postoperative period. No evident undesirable effects in relation to the addition of hyaluronidase. Trial registration Clinical Trial registry on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 03411330, 25-1-2018
    corecore