3 research outputs found

    Evaluation of visfatin in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Correlation with disease activity and lupus nephritis

    Get PDF
    AbstractIntroductionRenal involvement affects about 50% of SLE patients accounting for significant morbidity and mortality in these patients. The adipokine “visfatin” acting as a growth factor for B-lymphocyte-precursors, exerts several proinflammatory functions. It was demonstrated as a marker of endothelial dysfunction (ED) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) thus could be a factor linking inflammation in SLE and kidney disease.Aim of the workTo assess serum visfatin level in SLE patients and its correlation to disease activity and lupus nephritis (LN) in these patients.Patients and methodsSerum level of visfatin using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemical and immunological markers of SLE and LN were measured in 40 SLE patients and 40 age and sex matched healthy controls. Disease activity and renal involvement were assessed using SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and Renal SLEDAI respectively further dividing patients into active versus inactive and LN versus non-LN respectively. Renal biopsies were taken from LN subgroup and were classified according to the modified WHO classification.ResultsA significantly higher serum visfatin level was found on comparing SLE patients (mean 109±180ng/ml, median18) with controls (mean 9.4±11ng/ml, median2.5) with statistically highly significant difference (z=5.2, P<0.001). Also there was a statistically significant difference as regards serum visfatin level between active SLE patients (mean 173±111ng/ml, median 14) and inactive patients (mean 139±88ng/ml, median 5) (z=2.1, P<0.05) as well as between patients with LN (mean 226±180ng/ml, median18) and patients with no LN (mean 101±140ng/ml, median 8(2-229)) (z=2.1, P<0.05). Visfatin had a highly significant positive correlation with disease duration (r=0.48, P<0.001), SLEDAI (r=0.62, P<0.001) as well as ESR, CRP and, renal score (r=0.45, 0.35, and 0.65, respectively) while inverse correlation with estimated GFR (r=−0.614) and C3 and C4 titre (r=−0.26, r=−0.35, respectively) was recorded. Visfatin showed high sensitivity in detecting active SLE and LN 83% and 85%, respectively.ConclusionSerum visfatin is strongly associated with LN in SLE patients and is a promising biomarker for prediction of renal involvement in these patients. It reflects SLE activity specially LN activity namely renal score and GFR decline. Further prospective studies are required to confirm visfatin as a destructive mediator of predictive and prognostic value in active lupus nephritis

    The Interplay between Zinc, Vitamin D and, IL-17 in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Liver Disease

    No full text
    Objectives. To assess zinc (Zn) and vitamin D (Vit. D) status in chronic Hepatitis C virus- (HCV) infected patients and their relationship to interleukin- (IL-) 17 and disease severity and then investigate whether Zn and Vit. D3 modulate IL-17 expression in chronic HCV patients. Methods. Seventy patients and fifty healthy subjects were investigated. Serum levels of Zn, Vit. D, and IL-17 were assessed in the patients group and subgroups. Patients lymphocytes were activated in vitro in the presence or absence of Zn or Vit. D3 and then intracellular IL-17 production was assessed using flow cytometry. Results. Zn and Vit. D were significantly decreased in HCV patients. Increasing disease severity leads to more reduction in Zn level opposed by increasing IL-17 level. Zn potently reduced IL-17 production in a dose-related fashion; however it did not exert any toxic effects. Although Vit. D apparently increases IL17 expression, it is unclear whether it is due to its toxic effect on cell count or lack of definite association between Vit. D and both IL-17 and disease severity. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that Zn modulates IL-17 expression and provides a rationale for evaluating this compound as a supplementary agent in the treatment of chronic HCV

    Vitamin D Deficiency in Egyptian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: How Prevalent and Does it Impact Disease Activity?

    No full text
    Background The emerging role of vitamin D in immunology and autoimmune disorders has been a worldwide interest in the last decade. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are particularly at a delicate position predisposing them to suffer from vitamin D deficiency due to the multiple risk factors accompanying the disease. Whether vitamin D deficiency is also involved as a risk factor for developing SLE and affecting its course is a considerable concern. Objectives The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in SLE patients and its relation to disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our observational cross-sectional study, serum levels of vitamin D [25(OH)D] in 60 SLE patients and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were assessed and estimated for deficiency and insufficiency at 10 and 30 ng/mL, respectively. Disease activity was evaluated by SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), irreversible organ damage by Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR DI), and severity by Severity of Disease Index. Fatigue was measured by visual analog scale. Results Significantly lower levels of 25(OH)D were found in SLE patients (17.6 ± 6.9 ng/mL) in comparison to controls (79.0 ± 28.7 ng/mL), with a statistically high significant difference ( t = -11.2, P < 0.001). High prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency was detected as 73.3% and 23.3%, respectively. Vitamin D had a highly significant negative correlation with SLEDAI ( r = -0.495, P < 0.001), SLICC ( r = -0.431, P < 0.05), and fatigue ( r = -0.436, P < 0.05). Conclusion Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were found to be prevalent in SLE patients in our study and related to disease activity and fatigue. If needed, routine screening and consequent repletion of vitamin D are recommended in SLE patients. Restoring adequate vitamin D levels in SLE patients should be more explored as a potential yet simple measure to their usual management to improve their condition
    corecore