Conjunctival Melanoma: Features Based on the Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) in 540 Patients at a Single Ocular Oncology Center

Background: The Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) is a classification system for skin pigmentation that has been used to stratify risk for cutaneous melanoma; however, it has not yet been explored in the context of conjunctival melanoma. Herein, we examine FST and its association with the clinical features of conjunctival melanoma. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 540 medical records of patients with pathologic diagnosis of conjunctival melanoma. The patients were categorized according to the FST classification based on their external facial photographs at presentation. This includes: Type I (white skin color), Type II (fair skin color), Type III (average skin color), Type IV (light-brown skin color), Type V (brown skin color), and Type VI (black skin color). Other clinical features (namely tumor characteristics, tumor location, and tumor color) were also noted. Results: The FST included Types I (n=126, 23%), II (n=337, 62%), III (n=56, 10%), IV (n=8, 2%), V (n=12, 2%), and VI (n=1, \u3c1%). Statistical analysis (FST I vs. FST II vs. FST III, IV, V, and VI) revealed FST I and II tumors had smaller tumor thickness (2.1 vs. 2.8 vs. 3.6 mm, p=0.01) and less eyelid involvement (13% vs. 13% vs. 28%, p=0.02). Discussion: In this analysis, we found that the majority of patients with conjunctival melanoma are FST I or II; they also had smaller tumor thickness and less eyelid involvement than FST III, IV, V, and VI. Thus, patients with FST I and II should be considered a phenotype at risk for conjunctival melanoma and be observed accordingly

Capturing Initial Understanding and Impressions of Surgical Therapy for Parkinson\u27s Disease

Background: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an underutilized surgical therapy for Parkinson\u27s Disease (PD). Both physician and patient hesitancies have been described as potential barriers to DBS, but the specifics of patient perceptions of DBS have not been well-characterized in the general PD population. Objective: To characterize the understanding and impressions of surgical therapy in PD patients prior to formal surgical evaluation. Methods: A 30-question survey assessing impressions of surgical therapy for PD and understanding of DBS for PD was administered to PD patients seen at an urban movement disorders clinic. Results: One hundred and two patients completed the survey. When asked if they would undergo a hypothetical risk-free, curative brain surgery for PD, 98 patients responded “yes.” Patients were more agreeable to “reversible,” “minimally-invasive,” and “incisionless” surgery. 51.2% thought DBS is an “effective” treatment for PD, 76.6% thought it was “invasive,” and 18.3% thought it was “reversible.” 45.2% reported fear of being awake during DBS surgery. Regarding costs, 52.4% were concerned that DBS was “very expensive” or “not covered by insurance.” Initial source of information and perceived treatment effectiveness were not associated with concerns about DBS effectiveness or threats to normality. Negative perceptions of past surgery were associated with concerns about DBS altering mood and personality. Conclusion: Overall, patients expressed concerns regarding procedural efficacy, invasiveness, cost, and irreversibility—independent of the original source of information. Future studies are required to allow us to better understand the impact of these initial findings on DBS hesitancy and underutilization