15 research outputs found
Rectal Toxicity with MUPIT Interstitial Brachytherapy - Predictors, Clinical and Dosimetric Outcomes
Treatment outcome with low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in early-stage oral tongue cancers
Purpose : Although radical radiotherapy is known to be equally
effective for early-stage oral tongue cancers (T1-2 N0) with the added
advantage of organ and function preservation, surgery remains the
preferred treatment. We present outcome of patients treated with
brachytherapy (BT) either radical or boost. Materials and Methods :
Fifty-seven patients (T1/T2 31/26) were studied. Seventeen patients
(30%) were treated with radical BT (50-67 Gy) while 40 (70%) with
external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) + BT (36-56 Gy + 15-38 Gy].
Low-dose-rate (LDR) BT was delivered with 192 Ir wires, using plastic
bead technique with varied dose rates (< 60 cGy/h in 29 patients,
60-90 cGy/h in 17, and> 90 cGy/h in 11). Results : The overall
local control (LCR) was achieved in 59.7% (34/57) patients. LCR for T1
and T2 was 67.8% and 50%, respectively. A total of 23 patients had
failures [local: 20 (T1: 8; T2: 12 patients), node: 5 (T1:2; T2: 3),
and local + nodal: 3]. Overall 5-year disease-free survival and overall
survival (OAS) were 51% and 67%, respectively and those for T1 and T2
was 64.5/77.4% and 38.5/54% respectively (P = 0.002). All 16 patients
were salvaged. Median survival after salvage treatment was 13.5 months
(6-100 months). Soft tissue necrosis was observed in 12.3% (7/57) and
osteoradionecrosis in two patients. Conclusion : BT, as an integral
part of radical radiation therapy in early-stage tongue cancers,
appears to be an effective alternative treatment modality with
preservation of the organ and function without jeopardizing the
outcome
Treatment outcome with low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in early-stage oral tongue cancers
Purpose : Although radical radiotherapy is known to be equally
effective for early-stage oral tongue cancers (T1-2 N0) with the added
advantage of organ and function preservation, surgery remains the
preferred treatment. We present outcome of patients treated with
brachytherapy (BT) either radical or boost. Materials and Methods :
Fifty-seven patients (T1/T2 31/26) were studied. Seventeen patients
(30%) were treated with radical BT (50-67 Gy) while 40 (70%) with
external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) + BT (36-56 Gy + 15-38 Gy].
Low-dose-rate (LDR) BT was delivered with 192 Ir wires, using plastic
bead technique with varied dose rates (< 60 cGy/h in 29 patients,
60-90 cGy/h in 17, and> 90 cGy/h in 11). Results : The overall
local control (LCR) was achieved in 59.7% (34/57) patients. LCR for T1
and T2 was 67.8% and 50%, respectively. A total of 23 patients had
failures [local: 20 (T1: 8; T2: 12 patients), node: 5 (T1:2; T2: 3),
and local + nodal: 3]. Overall 5-year disease-free survival and overall
survival (OAS) were 51% and 67%, respectively and those for T1 and T2
was 64.5/77.4% and 38.5/54% respectively (P = 0.002). All 16 patients
were salvaged. Median survival after salvage treatment was 13.5 months
(6-100 months). Soft tissue necrosis was observed in 12.3% (7/57) and
osteoradionecrosis in two patients. Conclusion : BT, as an integral
part of radical radiation therapy in early-stage tongue cancers,
appears to be an effective alternative treatment modality with
preservation of the organ and function without jeopardizing the
outcome