101 research outputs found
The Critical Project Today
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92071/1/j.1933-1592.2012.00594.x.pd
Toward a More Adequate Consequentialism
Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142340/1/japp12302.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142340/2/japp12302_am.pd
Comment on Susanna Siegel, The Rationality of Perception
In Susanna Siegelâs compelling presentation of the case for the rationality of perception, a âsignificant part of the constructive defenseâ is played by the idea that there are âinferential routes to perceptual experienceâ (Siegel 2017, p. 94). Inferences, after all, are epistemically evaluable and bear on the rational standing of their conclusions. She argues that an obstacle to accepting this idea is a âReckoning Modelâ of inference, and shows by example that we recognize as inferences various familiar kinds of responses to information that do not fit this model. She offers a more general approach to the nature of inference that fits these examples and accommodates inferential routes to perceptual experience. I argue that Siegel needs to say more about the mental processes involved in such inferrings, and how it can be more than merely associative and yet still distinct from Reckoning. Fortunately, a psychologicallyâ and conceptuallyâgrounded distinction between modelâfree vs. modelâbased learning and guidance processes can provide a characterization that plays the role Siegel needs.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163584/2/phpr12735.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163584/1/phpr12735_am.pd
Normative Force and Normative Freedom: Hume and Kant, But Not Hume versus Kant
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73535/1/1467-9329.00098.pd
SUBJECT-IVE AND OBJECTIVE
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72513/1/j.1467-9329.1995.tb00087.x.pd
Reply to Ralph Wedgwood
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43373/1/11098_2005_Article_2321.pd
Reply to Ben Eggleston
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43372/1/11098_2005_Article_2320.pd
- âŠ