Secondary (Duret) brainstem haemorrhage may not always represent a fatal event: Review of literature and report of four cases

Background. Secondary brainstem haemorrhage (eponymously called Duret haemorrhage) is a well-known complication of transtentorial brain herniation or of rapid decompression of intracranial space. It is considered to be a consequence of arterial rupture, venous infarction or ischemia-reperfusion injury and it is regarded as a harbinger of an unfavourable outcome for the patient. Despite this, several case reports describing good outcome after Duret haemorrhage preceded by evacuation of an expansive traumatic intracranial mass lesion, an episode of intracranial hypotension or lumbar drainage have been published.Case description. We present four cases of patients with secondary brainstem haemorrhage linked to an episode of intracranial hypertension due to various reasons who were treated at our clinic. The first patient suffered a small brainstem haemorrhage that was described on his initial CT scan presumably as a result of massive intracranial expansion caused by an acute subdural haematoma and this Duret haemorrhage markedly expanded after the subdural haematoma was evacuated by means of a decompressive craniectomy. The next two patients developed Duret haemorrhage after the evacuation of intracranial haematomas. The fourth patient presented with posttraumatic cerebral oedema complicated by a subtle Duret haemorrhage displayed on his initial CT scan and this bleeding remained stable even after a bilateral decompressive craniectomy. One patient passed away, one remained in a persistent coma and two survived with a light neurological deficit.Conclusions. However ominous a newly discovered Duret haemorrhage may be, it alone should not discourage us from the further intensive treatment of our patients as their outcome may considerably vary. The extent of this bleeding, type and severity of underlying brain injury and complete clinical status and history of our patients should all be taken into account when deciding about patients’ prognosis

Change in sagittal profile after implantation of anchored interbody cage in the surgical procedure for degenerative cervical spine disease

Background. The aim of this study was to verify the relationship between changes in the segmental sagittal profile (SSP) and changes in the global sagittal profile (GSP) after anterior cervical discectomy with anchored cage implantation (ACDF). Study design. Prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Methods. This study includes 104 patients after 1-level or 2-level ACDF operated between the May 2013 and March 2016. SSP was evaluated by Cobb angle measurement of operated motion segment (CobbS) and GSP was evaluated by Cobb angle measurement in C2-C7 segments (CobbG). Both SSP and GSP were measured pre- and postoperatively within a 24 months follow-up period. The influence of factors such as age, gender, number of treated segments and osteoporosis was evaluated using t-tests. The correlation between SSP and GSP changes was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results. In the early postoperative period after 1-level ACDF, there was a significantly greater increase in CobbS compared to that of the 2-level ACDF (P=0.0149). Male patients experienced a significant decrease of CobbG during the first 6 months after surgery as well as patients with osteoporosis within 12 months after ACDF. After ACDF the SSP change weakly correlated with the GSP change. Conclusion. SSP change after 1- or 2-level ACDF correlates mostly weakly with GSP change. Male gender and osteoporosis were identified as risk factors for global lordotisation following ACDF