69 research outputs found

    Influence of Hyaluronic Acid in Periodontal Tissue Regeneration

    Get PDF
    Hyaluronic acid is a high molecular weight polysaccharide - glycosaminoglycan, which plays a vital role in the functioning of extracellular matrices, including those of mineralized and non-mineralized periodontal tissues. Hyaluronic acid is also important because of its numerous actions in the mechanisms associated with inflammation and the wound healing process. Hyaluronic acid has been identified in all periodontal tissues in varying quantities, being more prominent in the non-mineralized tissues, such as gingiva and periodontal ligament, compared to mineralized tissues, such as the cement and alveolar bone. Preliminary evidence suggests that hyaluronic acid is a very promising candidate as a mediator of periodontal tissue regeneration and periodontal disease treatment, by promoting a rapid remission of symptoms, not only to the marginal gingiva, but also to the deeper seated periodontal tissues. However, further researches for the therapeutic effects of hyaluronic acid in periodontal disease are essential for realization of true benefits of hyaluronic administration in periodontal tissue regeneration. Keywords: Hyaluronic Acid; Gingival Inflammation; Periodontal Disease; Periodontal Reparatio

    Surgical procedures for soft tissue ridge augmentation - interposition grafting procedure

    Get PDF
    Background: Numerous surgical grafting procedures designed to reconstruct a partially toothless ridge or ridge defects have been described in the literature over the years. The procedures can be grouped according to the means used to increase the ridge such as soft and hard tissue augmentation procedures. To illustrate the different approaches to utilizing soft tissue augmentation, the following procedures will be discussed: Pedicle graft, Roll graft and Free graft procedures (Pouch graft, Interposition graft and Onlay graft procedure). Description of the procedure: In interpositional graft procedures, there is no need to remove the epithelium from the surface of the donor tissue. If augmentation is required in both buccolingual and apico-coronary direction, part of the graft must be placed above the surface of the tissue around the recipient site. Some of the grafted connective tissue surfaces will be exposed in the oral cavity. "Envelope" or partial thickness flap with relaxing incisions, is prepared on the vestibular surface of the defective area. An appropriate donor site is selected at the palate or in the area of the maxillary tubercle, and a free epithelial-connective tissue graft is harvested. If enlargement of the ridge height is not required, the epithelial surface of the graft is placed with the surrounding epithelium. The graft is sutured all over the tissue at the recipient site. The temporary bridge is positioned to serve as a reference when estimating the amount of tissue needed to fill the defect. Outcomes: The newly formed granulation tissue during healing will make a border between the graft and the adjacent tissue, smooth and properly epithelialized. Edema, which occurs postoperatively, will help contour the ridge. Conclusions: Class III ridge defects are a major challenge for the dentists, as the ridge needs to be enlarged in both vertical and horizontal dimensions. The combined procedures can be used successfully in such situation

    Oral erythema multiforme –case reports, diagnostic and treatment dilemma

    Get PDF
    Erythema multiforme is acute mucocutaneous condition that is considered to be immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to medicine or an infection.There are described three forms of erythema multiforme: β€œminor form”, β€œmajor form” and oral erythema multiforme.It presents a diagnostic dilemma due to varied possible manifestations.Diagnosis is often made based on history and clinical examination.In this article we report 5 cases of different forms of erythema multiforme following drug administration.Keywords:erythema multiforme,drug induced

    Impact of Covid-19 pandemic ΠΎn orthodontic treatment

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and the attitudes, behaviors and beliefs related to orthodontic treatment. Methodological approach: The research represents a retrospective cross sectional study conducted on a sample of 192 orthodontic patients from public and private facilities. Results: A strong majority of respondents stated that the pandemic had an impact on their orthodontic treatment, lifestyle and financial situation. Only 19.8% of respondents would cancel scheduled orthodontic check-ups due to fear of infection with COVID-19, yet more than half of patients reported having anxiety related to COVID-19. More than half of the patients said they followed the orthodontist's instructions during the pandemic. Conclusion: The results generate useful information to help meenage the expectations and needs of patients and orthodontic practices during a pandemic, contributing to the continuous improvement of community dental health services. COVID-19-related anxiety is a factor in the success of orthodontic treatment as well as adequate communication between orthodontist and patient. Keywords: orthodontics, Covid-19, pandemi

    Is there any difference in arch dimension measurements at digital vs. plaster models?

    Get PDF
    Digital models are a reliable alternative to conventional plaster models that are accurate, efficient, easy to use, and allow visualization of the planned treatment results. The Aim: To make a comparison of arch dimensions measurements(width, length, and height) made on digital and plaster models. Material-Methods: Orthodontic plaster models of 60 patients with dental crowding, aged 13-18 years were observed. Linear measurements of arch dimensions were performed first manually with a digital caliper and then digitally with 3Shape’s OrthoAnalyzer TM software program on the scanned plaster models with 3Shape D800 TM scanner. Dental arch width, length and height by Harper were performed. Arch width was measured as intercanine, inter-premolar (IPM4, IPM5) and intermolar (IM6) distance. Arch length was measured as measured as the distance between the distal surface of the first permanent molar and the point of contact between the central incisors. Arch height was measured as the distance between the distal surfaces of the first permanent molars and the septal margin of the central incisors, following the linea mediana. Results: There is no statistically significant difference in the width of the dental arches between plaster and digital models. There is a statistically significant difference, in the length and height of both dental arches in favor of smaller length dimensions in digital models, and in addition to larger height dimensions in digital models. Conclusions: Measurements on digital models are suited for reliable diagnostic measurements, which compare well to those obtained from plaster casts, the current gold standard. Keywords: conventional plaster models, digital models, gnathometric analysis

    Facial convexity in macedonian subjects

    Get PDF
    Objective: The assessment of the patient’s soft tissue profile is a critical step in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Achieving a pleasing esthetic profile is an important goal of orthodontic therapy, and can influence the treatment plan and mechanotherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the convexity angles in Macedonian participants with different sagittal irregularities. The examination was performed on 90 profile cephalograms on Macedonian subjects with permanent dentition, aged 16-21 years, divided in Class I, II/1 and III malocclusions, with symmetrical gender distribution and no previous orthodontic treatment. Examined parameters were angle of facial convexity (N’– Sn’-Pg’) and angle of total facial convexity (N’-Pr’-Pg’). Results: The analysis of the size of the angle of facial convexity and angle of total facial convexity showed that the highest average value was in the subjects of class III, followed by class I and the lowest average values were in the subjects with II/1. For p <0.05, the analysis of variance indicated a significant difference between the three groups of malocclusion, in both sexes. There is a significant linear positive weak correlation between age and the parameter N’– Sn’-Pg β€˜(with increasing age the value of this parameter also increased ). Conclusion: Our study has shown that the biological range of facial soft tissue values needs to be determined according to age, sex, and orthodontic anomalies for each ethnic group. Keywords: esthetic profile, orthodontic therapy, cephalogram

    Oral signs of adverse drug reactions

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Adverse reactions to drugs are common and may have a variety of clinical presentations in the oral cavity. They are harmful and unintended responses to a medical product. As newer therapeutic agents are approved, it is likely that more adverse drug events will be encountered. The extent of adverse drug reactions is unknown; however, because a lot of them are asymptomatic, many are believed to go unnoticed. Their pathogenesis, especially of the mucosal reactions, is largely unknown and appears to involve complex interactions between the drug, other medications, the patient’s underlying disease, genetics and lifestyle factors. AIM: to describe the most common adverse drug reactions that dentists may encounter in daily clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: research was done exploring specialized databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCO, Science Direct, and Scopus for the period 2010-2023, by use of MeSH terms: adverse drug reaction, drug-induced reactions, oral manifestation. RESULTS. The most common oral manifestations were categorized into groups as follows: saliva and salivary gland involvement, soft tissue alterations, hard tissue damage, and non-specific oral conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of adverse drug-induced oral effects helps dental professionals to better diagnose oral disease, administer drugs, and improve patient compliance during drug therapy which may foster a more rational use of drugs. Keywords: oral cavity, adverse drug reactions, oral signs

    НСсакани Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈ - ΠΎΡ€Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ манифСстации

    Get PDF
    НСсаканитС Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈ сС чСста појава која ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π° сС манифСстира Π²ΠΎ усната ΠΏΡ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΈΠ½Π°. Од страна Π½Π° Π‘Π—Πž нСсаканата Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ Π΅ Π΄Π΅Ρ„ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ β€žΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊ кој Π΅ ΡˆΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π½ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΊΡƒΠ²Π°Π½, ΠΈ кој сС Ρ˜Π°Π²ΡƒΠ²Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π° која Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎ сС користи кај Ρ‡ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ Π·Π° профилакса, дијагноза, Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° болСст ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Ρ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡˆΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°β€œ Π¦Π΅Π»: Π΄Π° сС ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡˆΠ°Ρ‚ Π½Π°Ρ˜Ρ‡Π΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ нСсаканитС Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ со ΠΊΠΎΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π° сС срСтнат стоматолозитС Π²ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΡ˜Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° пракса. ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ: бСшС Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π±Π°Π·ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ†ΠΈ PubMed, PubMed Central, MEDLINE, EBSCO, Science Direct, Scopus Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡ‚ 2010-2022 Π³ΠΎΠ΄. со ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° MeSH Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈ: нСсакана Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈ, Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈ, уста, ΠΎΡ€Π°Π»Π½Π° ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ„Π΅ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ: Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ°Ρ‚Π° ΠΈ Π½Π°Ρ˜Ρ‡Π΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΡΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π±ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π±Π΅Π° ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ°: зафатСност Π½Π° ΠΏΠ»ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΆΠ»Π΅Π·Π΄ΠΈ, ΠΌΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π½Π° Ρ‚Π²Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π½Π΅ спСцифични ΡΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π±ΠΈ. Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΠΎΠΊ: ΠšΠΎΠ½ΡΡƒΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π½Π° Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ†ΠΈ, нСстСроидни Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π»Π°ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈ (ΠΠ‘ΠΠ˜Π›) ΠΈ имуносупрСсори сС Π½Π°Ρ˜Ρ‡Π΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΈΠΊΡƒΠ²Π°Π°Ρ‚ нСсакани Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΎ усната ΠΏΡ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΈΠ½Π°. Π—Π³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ Π²Π΅ΠΊ, ΠΈ сС ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΎΡ‚ Π±Ρ€ΠΎΡ˜ Π½Π° постара ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° која ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π° ΠΎΠ΄ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈ, ја Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π½ΡƒΠ²Π° ΡƒΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° стоматолозитС Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ Π΄Π° Π±ΠΈΠ΄Π°Ρ‚ Π·Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π΅Π½ΠΈ со нСсакани Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅, Π½ΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ„Π΅ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΠΈ Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡ‚ Π½Π° Π½ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°ΡŸΠΈΡ€Π°ΡšΠ΅

    Assessment of changes in the enamel topography after debonding adhesive remnants

    Get PDF
    Introduction: At orthodontic treatment completion, knowledge about the effects of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography is paramount. Aim: To determine the changes in enamel topography when applying different methods for debonding adhesive remnants. Material and methods: A sample of 40 extracted premolars were divided into 2 groups of 20 premolars each depending on the instrument used to remove the adhesive remnants: an ultrasonic instrument (Soniflex) and a tungsten-carbide bur and a low-speed handpiece ( 3,000mpr) water cooled. Metal brackets (Dentaurum, Germany) were bonded with the adhesive system of (Ormco Enlight Light Cure Adhesive; Ormco, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and stored in saline at room temperature for 48 hours, before debonding with adhesive removal plier from everyday clinical practice. The assessment of the changes in the enamel topography was based on the surface roughness index (SRI-Surface Roughness Index) according to the Vidor, using a 3D performance stereomicroscope. Results: When comparing TKB and ultrasound, we observed that there is a non-significantly lower score of damage to the enamel surface when using a tungsten carbide bur compared to ultrasound. Conclusion: A more efficient and safe method for removing adhesive remnants is when using a low-speed tungsten carbide bur, with which we have minimal damage to the enamel, insignificant subtraction from the thickness of the enamel surface, compared to ultrasound, which showed unsatisfactory results. Keywords: adhesive remnants, debonding, enamel damage, tungsten carbide bur, ultrasoun

    Π˜Π½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΡΡ†ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ€Π΅Π½ пристап ΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡ˜Π° кај ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ со ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°

    Get PDF
    Oligodontia is a rare developmental dental anomaly in humans characterized by the absence ofΒ six or more teeth. In European populations the estimated prevalence of both syndromic and non- syndromic oligodontia is 0.14%. Clinical Β features of oligodontia include six or more missing teeth, lack of development of maxillary and mandibular alveolar bone height and reduced lower facial height. Variation in tooth morphology, anomalies of the enamel, reduced size and aberrant form, delayed eruption have also been observed. Oligodontia is also associated with reduced salivary secretion rates. Β These bring a functional Β and esthetic Β limitations and impact on emotional well-being. The aim of this study was to present a case of a 12-year-old girl with oligodontia and therapeutic procedures for orthodontic-prosthetic rehabilitation and normal orofacial function. A multidisciplinary approach that includes orthodontic and prosthetic therapy is often necessary for dental management in young patients with oligodontia. Oral rehabilitation and maintenance care in individuals with many missing permanent teeth is a long-standing commitment that requires involvement of different specialists. Methods used are age-dependent, and early diagnosis is crucial. Orthodontic treatment, Β autotransplantation, Β dental implants, avoiding tooth preparations, and partial prosthetic dentures are treatment choices.ΠžΠ»ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° Π΅ Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ° Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Π»Π½Π° аномалија кај Ρ…ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°, која сС ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π° со нСдостаток Π½Π° ΡˆΠ΅ΡΡ‚ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ повСќС Π·Π°Π±ΠΈ. Π’ΠΎ Π•Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠΏΠ°, ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π²Π°Π»Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° синдромската ΠΈ нСсиндромската ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π΅ 0,14%. ΠšΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ манифСстации Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡƒΠ²Π°Π°Ρ‚ нСдостаток Π½Π° ΡˆΠ΅ΡΡ‚ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ повСќС Π·Π°Π±ΠΈ, Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΎΡ˜ Π½Π° максиларниот ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ±ΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ€Π½ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ Π°Π»Π²Π΅ΠΎΠ»Π°Ρ€Π΅Π½ Π³Ρ€Π΅Π±Π΅Π½ ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π½Π° Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΎΠ΄ Π»ΠΈΡ†Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ. Π’Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Π»Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ˜Π°, Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Π³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ Π°Π±Π΅Ρ€Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½Π° Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°, Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²ΠΎ Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ˜Π»ΠΎΡ‚, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ ΠΈ Β Π΄ΠΎΡ†Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Π΅Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°, Π΄ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎ ја Π²Π»ΠΎΡˆΡƒΠ²Π°Π°Ρ‚ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° слика. ΠžΠ»ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° Π΅ асоцирана ΠΈ со Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π° саливарна ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°. Π‘Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΎΠ²Π° Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ€Π° Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ СстСтски ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΈ, со ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ°ΠΊΡ‚ Π½Π° Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ Π·Π΄Ρ€Π°Π²Ρ˜Π΅. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° Π΅ Π΄Π° сС ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°Ρ˜ Π½Π° 12-годишно Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΎΡ˜Ρ‡Π΅ со ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°, ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ тСраписки ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ€ΠΈ Π·Π° ортодонтско-протСтска Ρ€Π΅Ρ…Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Π»Π½Π° ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Π½Π° Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°. МоТС Π΄Π° сС Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡ€Π°Π»Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρ€Π΅Ρ…Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° кај ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡƒΠΈΡ‚Π΅ со ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Β  Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π΅Π½ процСс Π²ΠΎ кој сС Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈ. Π’Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΎΡ‚ зависи ΠΎΠ΄ возраста, Π° Ρ€Π°Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° дијагноза Π΅ ΠΊΡ€ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Π½Π°. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π²Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° кариСс, ортодонтскиот Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΌΠ°Π½, Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π°, Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ, ΠΈΠ·Π±Π΅Π³Π½ΡƒΠ²Π°ΡšΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π·Π°Π±ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ протСтски надомСстоци сС ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Ρ‡Π°Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ
    • …
    corecore