Electromechanical reciprocity and arrhythmogenesis in long-QT syndrome and beyond.

An abundance of literature describes physiological and pathological determinants of cardiac performance, building on the principles of excitation-contraction coupling. However, the mutual influencing of excitation-contraction and mechano-electrical feedback in the beating heart, here designated 'electromechanical reciprocity', remains poorly recognized clinically, despite the awareness that external and cardiac-internal mechanical stimuli can trigger electrical responses and arrhythmia. This review focuses on electromechanical reciprocity in the long-QT syndrome (LQTS), historically considered a purely electrical disease, but now appreciated as paradigmatic for the understanding of mechano-electrical contributions to arrhythmogenesis in this and other cardiac conditions. Electromechanical dispersion in LQTS is characterized by heterogeneously prolonged ventricular repolarization, besides altered contraction duration and relaxation. Mechanical alterations may deviate from what would be expected from global and regional repolarization abnormalities. Pathological repolarization prolongation outlasts mechanical systole in patients with LQTS, yielding a negative electromechanical window (EMW), which is most pronounced in symptomatic patients. The electromechanical window is a superior and independent arrhythmia-risk predictor compared with the heart rate-corrected QT. A negative EMW implies that the ventricle is deformed-by volume loading during the rapid filling phase-when repolarization is still ongoing. This creates a 'sensitized' electromechanical substrate, in which inadvertent electrical or mechanical stimuli such as local after-depolarizations, after-contractions, or dyssynchrony can trigger abnormal impulses. Increased sympathetic-nerve activity and pause-dependent potentiation further exaggerate electromechanical heterogeneities, promoting arrhythmogenesis. Unraveling electromechanical reciprocity advances the understanding of arrhythmia formation in various conditions. Real-time image integration of cardiac electrophysiology and mechanics offers new opportunities to address challenges in arrhythmia management

Proarrhythmic proclivity of left-stellate ganglion stimulation in a canine model of drug-induced long-QT syndrome type 1

Background Left-stellate ganglion stimulation (LSGS) can modify regional dispersion of ventricular refractoriness, promote triggered activity, and reduce the threshold for ventricular fibrillation (VF). Sympathetic hyperactivity precipitates torsades de pointes (TdP) and VF in susceptible patients with long-QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1). We investigated the electromechanical effects of LSGS in a canine model of drug-induced LQT1, gaining novel arrhythmogenic insights. Methods In nine mongrel dogs, the left and right stellate ganglia were exposed for electrical stimulation. ECG, left- and right-ventricular endocardial monophasic action potentials (MAPs) and pressures (LVP, RVP) were recorded. The electromechanical window (EMW; Q to LVP at 90% relaxation minus QT interval) was calculated. LQT1 was mimicked by infusion of the KCNQ1/IKs blocker HMR1556. Results At baseline, LSGS and right-stellate ganglion stimulation (RSGS) caused similar heart-rate acceleration and QT shortening. Positive inotropic and lusitropic effects were more pronounced under LSGS than RSGS. IKs blockade prolonged QTc, triggered MAP-early afterdepolarizations (EADs) and rendered the EMW negative, but no ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred. Superimposed LSGS exaggerated EMW negativity and evoked TdP in 5/9 dogs within 30 s. Preceding extrasystoles originated mostly from the outflow-tracts region. TdP deteriorated into therapy-refractory VF in 4/5 animals. RSGS did not provoke TdP/VF. Conclusions In this model of drug-induced LQT1, LSGS readily induced TdP and VF during repolarization prolongation and MAP-EAD generation, but only if EMW turned from positive to very negative. We postulate that altered mechano-electric coupling can exaggerate regional dispersion of refractoriness and facilitates ventricular ectopy

The circle of reentry: Characteristics of trigger-substrate interaction leading to sudden cardiac arrest

Sudden cardiac death is often caused by ventricular arrhythmias driven by reentry. Comprehensive characterization of the potential triggers and substrate in survivors of sudden cardiac arrest has provided insights into the trigger-substrate interaction leading to reentry. Previously, a “Triangle of Arrhythmogenesis”, reflecting interactions between substrate, trigger and modulating factors, has been proposed to reason about arrhythmia initiation. Here, we expand upon this concept by separating the trigger and substrate characteristics in their spatial and temporal components. This yields four key elements that are required for the initiation of reentry: local dispersion of excitability (e.g., the presence of steep repolarization time gradients), a critical relative size of the region of excitability and the region of inexcitability (e.g., a sufficiently large region with early repolarization), a trigger that originates at a time when some tissue is excitable and other tissue is inexcitable (e.g., an early premature complex), and which occurs from an excitable region (e.g., from a region with early repolarization). We discuss how these findings yield a new mechanistic framework for reasoning about reentry initiation, the “Circle of Reentry.” In a patient case of unexplained ventricular fibrillation, we then illustrate how a comprehensive clinical investigation of these trigger-substrate characteristics may help to understand the associated arrhythmia mechanism. We will also discuss how this reentry initiation concept may help to identify patients at risk, and how similar reasoning may apply to other reentrant arrhythmias

The genetic basis of apparently idiopathic ventricular fibrillation:A retrospective overview

Aims: During the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF), next-generation sequencing panels can be considered to identify genotypes associated with arrhythmias. However, consensus for gene panel testing is still lacking, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are often identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic testing and its results in idiopathic VF patients. Methods and results: We investigated 419 patients with available medical records from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Genetic testing was performed in 379 (91%) patients [median age at event 39 years (27-51), 60% male]. Single-gene testing was performed in 87 patients (23%) and was initiated more often in patients with idiopathic VF before 2010. Panel testing was performed in 292 patients (77%). The majority of causal (likely) pathogenic variants (LP/P, n = 56, 15%) entailed the DPP6 risk haplotype (n = 39, 70%). Moreover, 10 LP/P variants were found in cardiomyopathy genes (FLNC, MYL2, MYH7, PLN (two), TTN (four), RBM20), and 7 LP/P variants were identified in genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias (KCNQ1, SCN5A (2), RYR2 (four)). For eight patients (2%), identification of an LP/P variant resulted in a change of diagnosis. In 113 patients (30%), a VUS was identified. Broad panel testing resulted in a higher incidence of VUS in comparison to single-gene testing (38% vs. 3%, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Almost all patients from the registry underwent, albeit not broad, genetic testing. The genetic yield of causal LP/P variants in idiopathic VF patients is 5%, increasing to 15% when including DPP6. In specific cases, the LP/P variant is the underlying diagnosis. A gene panel specifically for idiopathic VF patients is proposed.</p

The genetic basis of apparently idiopathic ventricular fibrillation:A retrospective overview

Aims: During the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF), next-generation sequencing panels can be considered to identify genotypes associated with arrhythmias. However, consensus for gene panel testing is still lacking, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are often identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic testing and its results in idiopathic VF patients. Methods and results: We investigated 419 patients with available medical records from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Genetic testing was performed in 379 (91%) patients [median age at event 39 years (27-51), 60% male]. Single-gene testing was performed in 87 patients (23%) and was initiated more often in patients with idiopathic VF before 2010. Panel testing was performed in 292 patients (77%). The majority of causal (likely) pathogenic variants (LP/P, n = 56, 15%) entailed the DPP6 risk haplotype (n = 39, 70%). Moreover, 10 LP/P variants were found in cardiomyopathy genes (FLNC, MYL2, MYH7, PLN (two), TTN (four), RBM20), and 7 LP/P variants were identified in genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias (KCNQ1, SCN5A (2), RYR2 (four)). For eight patients (2%), identification of an LP/P variant resulted in a change of diagnosis. In 113 patients (30%), a VUS was identified. Broad panel testing resulted in a higher incidence of VUS in comparison to single-gene testing (38% vs. 3%, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Almost all patients from the registry underwent, albeit not broad, genetic testing. The genetic yield of causal LP/P variants in idiopathic VF patients is 5%, increasing to 15% when including DPP6. In specific cases, the LP/P variant is the underlying diagnosis. A gene panel specifically for idiopathic VF patients is proposed.</p

Right-Ventricular Enlargement in Arrhythmogenic Right-Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Is Associated with Decreased QRS Amplitudes and T-Wave Negativity

Background Arrhythmogenic right-ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) can lead to RV dilatation. We hypothesized that electrocardiographic characteristics including QRS amplitudes in the extremity- and precordial leads, the S amplitude in lead V-1, and extent of T-wave negativity over the precordial leads are related to RV dilatation in this condition. MethodsIn 42 ARVC patients and 42 controls, we correlated total QRS amplitude in the extremity leads (Sigma QRS(ext)), precordial leads (Sigma QRS(prec)) and in all leads (Sigma QRS(tot) : summation of Sigma QRS(ext) and Sigma QRS(prec)), S amplitude in lead V-1 and the extent of T-wave inversion in the precordial leads (V-1 vs. beyond V-1) with RV end diastolic diameter (RVEDD) by echocardiography. ResultsIn the ARVC group, the mean age was 46 14 years, 31 patients were male, 28 had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and 7 had a LV ejection fraction (EF) <55%. The control group was age- and gender matched to the ARVC cohort. In contrast to controls, the Sigma QRS(ext) (regression coefficient (RC), -0.29; P = 0.020), Sigma QRS(prec) (RC, -0.20; P = 0.015), and Sigma QRS(tot) (RC, -0.14; P = 0.009) were lower with RV dilatation in ARVC. S amplitude in lead V-1 was not related to RV diameter (RC, -0.98; P = 0.088). Precordial T-wave inversion beyond lead V-1 (V-2-V-6) was associated with a larger RV diameter (RC, 8.58; P = 0.012). ConclusionsSummed QRS amplitudes in the extremity and precordial leads, and T-wave inversion beyond lead V-1 are associated with RV dilatation in patients with ARVC