Pattern of congenital anomalies among pediatric surgical patients in a tertiary care hospital in northern Tanzania

Background Congenital anomalies are major causes of morbidity and mortality in children under 5 years of age and make a significant contribution to the surgical burden of diseases. Most anomalies have multifactorial causes and commonly affect the central nervous, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal systems. Countries with improved pediatric surgical care have shown dramatic reductions in morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to analyze the pattern of congenital anomalies presenting in our surgical departments in patients under 5 years of age.Methods A retrospective descriptive study was done. Data were obtained from clinical records of patients under 5 years of age, who underwent surgical correction of their congenital anomalies between 2017 and 2021. Analysis was done to identify the proportion of congenital anomalies managed in our setting.Results Congenital anomalies contributed 4.6% of overall surgical burden. Totally, 822 patients with congenital anomalies were included for analysis. The most commonly diagnosed congenital anomaly was inguinal hernia, followed by hydrocephalus, neural tube defects and cleft lips. The most commonly affected system was the central nervous system, anterior abdominal wall, orofacial and digestive system in decreasing order of frequency. Most of our patients presented outside the neonatal period (84.4%), and few (16.1%) had more than one system affected. Male children comprised 64%.Conclusions Delayed presentation of children with congenital anomalies is still a significant problem in our area. Prevention through nutritional supplementation and antenatal screening is crucial. The true epidemiology of congenital anomalies in northern Tanzania is still obscure

Global Neurosurgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Two Training Methods in Resource-Poor Settings

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many low- and middle-income countries are experiencing profound health care workforce shortages. Surgical subspecialists generally practice in large urban centers but are in high demand in rural areas. These subspecialists must be trained through sustainable programs to address this disparity. We quantitatively compared the relative effectiveness of 2 unique training models to advance neurosurgical skills in resource-poor settings where formally trained neurosurgeons are unavailable. METHODS: Neurosurgical procedure data were collected from 2 hospitals in Tanzania (Haydom Lutheran Hospital [HLH] and Bugando Medical Centre [BMC]), where 2 distinct training models ( Train Forward and Back-to-Back, respectively) were incorporated between 2005 and 2012. RESULTS: The most common procedures performed were ventriculoperitoneal shunt (BMC: 559, HLH: 72), spina bifida repair (BMC: 187, HLH: 54), craniotomy (BMC: 61, HLH: 19), bone elevation (BMC: 42, HLH: 32), and craniotomy and evacuation (BMC: 18, HLH: 34). The number of annual procedures at BMC increased from 148 in 2008 to 357 in 2012; at HLH, they increased from 18 in 2005 to 80 in 2010. Postoperative complications over time decreased or did not significantly change at both sites as the diversity of procedures increased. CONCLUSION: The Train Forward and Back-to-Back training models were associated with increased surgical volume and complexity without increased complications. However, only the Train Forward model resulted in local, autonomous training of surgical subspecialists after completion of the initial training period. Incorporating the Train Forward method into existing training programs in low- and middle-income countries may provide unique benefits over historic training practices