Fibrin Glue Coating Limits Scar Tissue Formation around Peripheral Nerves

Scar tissue formation presents a significant barrier to peripheral nerve recovery in clinical practice. While different experimental methods have been described, there is no clinically available gold standard for its prevention. This study aims to determine the potential of fibrin glue (FG) to limit scarring around peripheral nerves. Thirty rats were divided into three groups: glutaraldehyde-induced sciatic nerve injury treated with FG (GA + FG), sciatic nerve injury with no treatment (GA), and no sciatic nerve injury (Sham). Neural regeneration was assessed with weekly measurements of the visual static sciatic index as a parameter for sciatic nerve function across a 12-week period. After 12 weeks, qualitative and quantitative histological analysis of scar tissue formation was performed. Furthermore, histomorphometric analysis and wet muscle weight analysis were performed after the postoperative observation period. The GA + FG group showed a faster functional recovery (6 versus 9 weeks) compared to the GA group. The FG-treated group showed significantly lower perineural scar tissue formation and significantly higher fiber density, myelin thickness, axon thickness, and myelinated fiber thickness than the GA group. A significantly higher wet muscle weight ratio of the tibialis anterior muscle was found in the GA + FG group compared to the GA group. Our results suggest that applying FG to injured nerves is a promising scar tissue prevention strategy associated with improved regeneration both at the microscopic and at the functional level. Our results can serve as a platform for innovation in the field of perineural regeneration with immense clinical potential.</p

Fibrin Glue Coating Limits Scar Tissue Formation around Peripheral Nerves

Scar tissue formation presents a significant barrier to peripheral nerve recovery in clinical practice. While different experimental methods have been described, there is no clinically available gold standard for its prevention. This study aims to determine the potential of fibrin glue (FG) to limit scarring around peripheral nerves. Thirty rats were divided into three groups: glutaraldehyde-induced sciatic nerve injury treated with FG (GA + FG), sciatic nerve injury with no treatment (GA), and no sciatic nerve injury (Sham). Neural regeneration was assessed with weekly measurements of the visual static sciatic index as a parameter for sciatic nerve function across a 12-week period. After 12 weeks, qualitative and quantitative histological analysis of scar tissue formation was performed. Furthermore, histomorphometric analysis and wet muscle weight analysis were performed after the postoperative observation period. The GA + FG group showed a faster functional recovery (6 versus 9 weeks) compared to the GA group. The FG-treated group showed significantly lower perineural scar tissue formation and significantly higher fiber density, myelin thickness, axon thickness, and myelinated fiber thickness than the GA group. A significantly higher wet muscle weight ratio of the tibialis anterior muscle was found in the GA + FG group compared to the GA group. Our results suggest that applying FG to injured nerves is a promising scar tissue prevention strategy associated with improved regeneration both at the microscopic and at the functional level. Our results can serve as a platform for innovation in the field of perineural regeneration with immense clinical potential.</p

Three Useful Tips and Tricks for Intraoperative Nerve Stimulation

Disposable handheld nerve stimulators are widely used in peripheral nerve surgery. Such devices stimulate a motor nerve or the motor component of a mixed nerve by applying electrical current to the proximal region, targeting the main nerve trunk. This stimulation then travels along the motor nerve, reaching the distal end to control the corresponding muscle(s). In this study, the authors demonstrate three useful tips and tricks for handheld nerve stimulation during targeted muscle reinnervation and peripheral nerve surgery. The three tips are (1) identification of proximal muscle contraction by retrograde electrical stimulation of a distal sensory nerve; (2) graded stimulation for identifying motor nerves within fibrotic scarred tissue beds or parallel to the major motor/mixed nerve of interest; and (3) proximal stimulation for validation of adequate post-targeted muscle reinnervation coaptation(s).</p

Neuroma Analysis in Humans:Standardizing Sample Collection and Documentation

Introduction: The biology of symptomatic neuromas is poorly understood, particularly the factors causing pain in human neuromas. Pain presence varies among and within individuals, with some having painful and nonpainful neuromas. To bridge these knowledge gaps, our group developed a protocol for assessing neuroma pain and collecting tissue for molecular analysis. This manuscript outlines our workflow and challenges and aims to inspire other centers to share their experiences with these tissues. Methods: For every included patient and collected nerve or bone tissue specimens, we perform a detailed chart review and a multifaceted analysis of pain and pain perception immediately before surgery. We collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on pain, function, and mental well-being outcomes at preoperative assessment and at the 6-month follow-up postoperatively. Before surgery, the patient is assessed once again to obtain an immediate preoperative pain status and identify potential differences in pain intensity of different neuromas. Intraoperatively, specimens are obtained and their gross anatomical features are recorded, after which they are stored in paraformaldehyde or frozen for later sample analyses. Postoperatively, patients are contacted to obtain additional postoperative PROMs. Results: A total of 220 specimens of nerve tissue have been successfully obtained from 83 limbs, comprising 95 specimens of neuromas and 125 specimens of nerves located proximal to the neuromas or from controls.Conclusions: Our approach outlines the methods combining specimen collection and examination, including both macroscopic and molecular biological features, with PROMs, encompassing physical and psychological aspects, along with clinical metadata obtained through clinical teams and chart review.</p

The Peripheral Nerve Surgeon's Role in the Management of Neuropathic Pain

Neuropathic pain (NP) underlies significant morbidity and disability worldwide. Although pharmacologic and functional therapies attempt to address this issue, they remain incompletely effective for many patients. Peripheral nerve surgeons have a range of techniques for intervening on NP. The aim of this review is to enable practitioners to identify patients with NP who might benefit from surgical intervention. The workup for NP includes patient history and specific physical examination maneuvers, as well as imaging and diagnostic nerve blocks. Once diagnosed, there is a range of options surgeons can utilize based on specific causes of NP. These techniques include nerve decompression, nerve reconstruction, nerve ablative techniques, and implantable nerve-modulating devices. In addition, there is an emerging role for preoperative involvement of peripheral nerve surgeons for cases known to carry a high risk of inducing postoperative NP. Lastly, we describe the ongoing work that will enable surgeons to expand their armamentarium to better serve patients with NP

Neuroma Analysis in Humans:Standardizing Sample Collection and Documentation

Introduction: The biology of symptomatic neuromas is poorly understood, particularly the factors causing pain in human neuromas. Pain presence varies among and within individuals, with some having painful and nonpainful neuromas. To bridge these knowledge gaps, our group developed a protocol for assessing neuroma pain and collecting tissue for molecular analysis. This manuscript outlines our workflow and challenges and aims to inspire other centers to share their experiences with these tissues. Methods: For every included patient and collected nerve or bone tissue specimens, we perform a detailed chart review and a multifaceted analysis of pain and pain perception immediately before surgery. We collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on pain, function, and mental well-being outcomes at preoperative assessment and at the 6-month follow-up postoperatively. Before surgery, the patient is assessed once again to obtain an immediate preoperative pain status and identify potential differences in pain intensity of different neuromas. Intraoperatively, specimens are obtained and their gross anatomical features are recorded, after which they are stored in paraformaldehyde or frozen for later sample analyses. Postoperatively, patients are contacted to obtain additional postoperative PROMs. Results: A total of 220 specimens of nerve tissue have been successfully obtained from 83 limbs, comprising 95 specimens of neuromas and 125 specimens of nerves located proximal to the neuromas or from controls.Conclusions: Our approach outlines the methods combining specimen collection and examination, including both macroscopic and molecular biological features, with PROMs, encompassing physical and psychological aspects, along with clinical metadata obtained through clinical teams and chart review.</p

Three Useful Tips and Tricks for Intraoperative Nerve Stimulation

Summary:. Disposable handheld nerve stimulators are widely used in peripheral nerve surgery. Such devices stimulate a motor nerve or the motor component of a mixed nerve by applying electrical current to the proximal region, targeting the main nerve trunk. This stimulation then travels along the motor nerve, reaching the distal end to control the corresponding muscle(s). In this study, the authors demonstrate three useful tips and tricks for handheld nerve stimulation during targeted muscle reinnervation and peripheral nerve surgery. The three tips are (1) identification of proximal muscle contraction by retrograde electrical stimulation of a distal sensory nerve; (2) graded stimulation for identifying motor nerves within fibrotic scarred tissue beds or parallel to the major motor/mixed nerve of interest; and (3) proximal stimulation for validation of adequate post-targeted muscle reinnervation coaptation(s)

Pain Sketches to Predict Pain following Primary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Amputees

Background: Numeric scales are validated methods to report pain outcomes after targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) but do not include the assessment of qualitative pain components. This study evaluates the application of pain sketches within a cohort of patients undergoing primary TMR and describes differences in pain progression according to early postoperative sketches. Methods: This study included 30 patients with major limb amputation and primary TMR. Patients' drawings were categorized into four categories of pain distribution [focal pain (FP), radiating pain (RP), diffuse pain (DP), or no pain (NP)] and interrater reliability was calculated. Second, pain outcomes were analyzed for each category. Pain scores were the primary outcome, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments were the secondary outcome. Results: The interrater reliability for the sketch categories was good (overall kappa coefficient of 0.8). The NP category reported a mean decrease in pain of 4.8 points, followed by the DP (2.5 points) and FP categories (2.0 points). The RP category reported a mean increase in pain of 0.5 points. For PROMIS Pain Interference and Pain Intensity, the DP category reported a mean decrease of 7.2 and 6.5 points, respectively, followed by the FP category (5.3 and 3.6 points). The RP category reported a mean increase of 2.0 points in PROMIS Pain Interference and a mean decrease of 1.4 points in PROMIS Pain Intensity. Secondary outcomes for the NP category were not reported. Conclusion: Pain sketches demonstrated reliability in pain morphology assessment and might be an adjunctive tool for pain interpretation in this setting.</p