4 research outputs found
Adipocytokines and Insulin Resistance: Their Role as Benign Breast Disease and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a High-Prevalence Overweight-Obesity Group of Women over 40 Years Old
Insulin levels, adipocytokines, and inflammatory mediators trigger benign breast disease (BBD) and breast cancer (BC). The relationship between serum adipocytokines levels, overweight-obesity, metabolic disturbs, and BC is unclear. Methods: To analyze the serum levels of the adipocytokines, insulin, and the HOMA IR in women without breast disease, with BBD or BC, and the role of these as risk factors for benign breast disease or breast cancer. Results: Adipsin values > 0.91 and visfatin levels > 1.18 ng/mL represent a risk factor to develop BBD in NBD lean women (OR = 18; and OR = 12). Data in overweight-obese women groups confirm the observation due to insulin levels > 2.6 mU/mL and HOMA IR > 0.78, with OR = 60.2 and 18, respectively; adipsin OR = 26.4, visfatin OR = 12. Breast cancer risk showed a similar behavior: Adipsin risk, adjusted by insulin and visfatin OR = 56 or HOMA IR and visfatin OR = 22.7. Conclusion: Adipose tissue is crucial for premalignant and malignant tissue transformation in women with overweight-obesity. The adipocyte–breast epithelium interaction could trigger a malignant transformation in a continuum, starting with BBD as premalignant disease, especially in overweight-obese women
Role of Incretins in Muscle Functionality, Metabolism, and Body Composition in Breast Cancer: A Metabolic Approach to Understanding This Pathology
A poorly studied issue in women with breast cancer is the role of incretins (GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) and GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1)) in the quantity and quality of muscle mass in lean and obese individuals. The current report aims to analyze the patterns of association and the role of incretin in muscle functionality and body composition in women with cancer compared with healthy women (mammography BI-RADS I or II) to elucidate whether GIP and GLP-1 can be used to estimate the risk, in conjunction with overweight or obesity, for breast cancer. We designed a case–control study in women with a breast cancer diagnosis confirmed by biopsy in different clinical stages (CS; n = 87) and healthy women with a mastography BI-RADS I or II within the last year (n = 69). The women were grouped according to body mass index (BMI): lean (2BS), overweight (≥25–2BS), and obese (≥30 kg/m2BS). We found that GLP-1 and GIP levels over 18 pg/mL were associated with a risk of breast cancer (GIP OR = 36.5 and GLP-1 OR = 4.16, for the entire sample), particularly in obese women (GIP OR = 8.8 and GLP-1 OR = 6.5), and coincidentally with low muscle quality indexes, showed an association between obesity, cancer, incretin defects, and loss of muscle functionality
Socioeconomic, Clinical, and Molecular Features of Breast Cancer Influence Overall Survival of Latin American Women
Molecular profile of breast cancer in Latin-American women was studied in five countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Uruguay. Data about socioeconomic characteristics, risk factors, prognostic factors, and molecular subtypes were described, and the 60-month overall cumulative survival probabilities (OS) were estimated. From 2011 to 2013, 1,300 eligible Latin-American women 18 years or older, with a diagnosis of breast cancer in clinical stage II or III, and performance status ≦̸1 were invited to participate in a prospective cohort study. Face-to-face interviews were conducted, and clinical and outcome data, including death, were extracted from medical records. Unadjusted associations were evaluated by Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests and the OS by Kaplan–Meier method. Log-rank test was used to determine differences between cumulative probability curves. Multivariable adjustment was carried out by entering potential confounders in the Cox regression model. The OS at 60 months was 83.9%. Multivariable-adjusted death hazard differences were found for women living in Argentina (2.27), Chile (1.95), and Uruguay (2.42) compared with Mexican women, for older (≥60 years) (1.84) compared with younger (≤40 years) women, for basal-like subtype (5.8), luminal B (2.43), and HER2-enriched (2.52) compared with luminal A subtype, and for tumor clinical stages IIB (1.91), IIIA (3.54), and IIIB (3.94) compared with stage IIA women. OS was associated with country of residence, PAM50 intrinsic subtype, age, and tumor stage at diagnosis. While the latter is known to be influenced by access to care, including cancer screening, timely diagnosis and treatment, including access to more effective treatment protocols, it may also influence epigenetic changes that, potentially, impact molecular subtypes. Data derived from heretofore understudied populations with unique geographic ancestry and sociocultural experiences are critical to furthering our understanding of this complexity. Copyright © 2022 de Almeida, CortĂ©s, Vilensky, Valenzuela, Cortes-Sanabria, de Souza, Barbeito, Abdelhay, Artagaveytia, Daneri-Navarro, Llera, MĂĽller, Podhajcer, Velazquez, Alcoba, Alonso, Bravo, Camejo, Carraro, Castro, Cataldi, Cayota, Cerda, Colombo, Crocamo, Del Toro-Arreola, Delgadillo-Cristerna, Delgado, Breitenbach, Fernández, Fernández, Fernández, Franco-Topete, Gaete, GĂłmez, Gonzalez-Ramirez, Guerrero, Gutierrez-Rubio, Jalfin, Lopez-Vazquez, Loria, MĂguez, Moran-Mendoza, Morgan-Villela, Mussetti, Nagai, Oceguera-Villanueva, Reis, Retamales, Rodriguez, Rosales, Salas-Gonzalez, Segovia, Sendoya, Silva-Garcia, Viña, Zagame, Jones, Szklo and United States-Latin American Cancer Research Network (US-LACRN).Fil: de Almeida, Liz Maria. Instituto Nacional de Cáncer; BrasilFil: CortĂ©s, Sandra. Pontificia Universidad CatĂłlica de Chile; ChileFil: Vilensky, Marta. Instituto de OncologĂa Angel Roffo; ArgentinaFil: Valenzuela, Olivia. Universidad de Sonora; MĂ©xicoFil: Cortes-Sanabria, Laura. Hospital de Especialidades, CMNO-IMSS; MĂ©xicoFil: de Souza, Mirian. Instituto Nacional de Cáncer; BrasilFil: Barbeito, Rafael Alonso. Facultad de Medicina; ArgentinaFil: Abdelhay, Eliana. Instituto Nacional de Cáncer; BrasilFil: Artagaveytia, Nora. Hospital de ClĂnicas Manuel Quintela. Universidad de la RepĂşblica; UruguayFil: Daneri-Navarro, Adrian. Universidad de Guadalajara; MĂ©xicoFil: Llera, Andrea S. CONICET. FundaciĂłn Instituto Leloir; ArgentinaFil: MĂĽller, Bettina. Instituto Nacional del Cáncer; ArgentinaFil: Podhajcer, Osvaldo L. CONICET. FundaciĂłn Instituto Leloir; ArgentinaFil: Velazquez, Carlos. Universidad de Sonora; MĂ©xicoFil: Alcoba, Elsa. Hospital Municipal de OncologĂa MarĂa Curie; ArgentinaFil: Alonso, Isabel. Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell; ArgentinaFil: Bravo, Alicia I. Hospital Regional de Agudos Eva PerĂłn; ArgentinaFil: Camejo, Natalia. Hospital de ClĂnicas Manuel Quintela. Universidad de la RepĂşblica; UruguayFil: Carraro, Dirce Maria. AC Camargo Cancer Center; BrasilFil: Castro, MĂłnica. Instituto de OncologĂa Angel Roffo; ArgentinaFil: Cataldi, Sandra. Instituto Nacional de Cáncer; UruguayFil: Cayota, Alfonso. Institut Pasteur de Montevideo; UruguayFil: Cerda, Mauricio. Universidad de Chile; ChileFil: Colombo, Alicia. Universidad de Chile; ChileFil: Crocamo, Susanne. Instituto Nacional de Cáncer; BrasilFil: Del Toro-Arreola, Alicia. Universidad de Guadalajara; MĂ©xicoFil: Delgadillo-Cristerna, Raul. Hospital de Especialidades. CMNO-IMSS; MĂ©xicoFil: Delgado, Lucia. Hospital de ClĂnicas Manuel Quintela; UruguayFil: Breitenbach, Marisa Dreyer. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Fernández, Elmer. Universidad CatĂłlica de CĂłrdoba. CONICET. Centro de Investigaciones en BioquĂmica ClĂnica e Inmunologia; ArgentinaFil: Fernández, Jorge. Instituto de Salud PĂşblica; ChileFil: Fernández, Wanda. Hospital San Borja Arriarán; ChileFil: Franco-Topete, Ramon A. OPD Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Universidad de Guadalajara; MĂ©xicoFil: Gaete, Fancy. Hospital Luis Tisne; ChileFil: GĂłmez, Jorge. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Gonzalez-Ramirez, Leivy P. Universidad de Guadalajara; MĂ©xicoFil: Guerrero, Marisol. Hospital San JosĂ©; ChileFil: Gutierrez-Rubio, Susan A. Universidad de Guadalajara; MĂ©xicoFil: Jalfin, Beatriz. Hospital Regional de Agudos Eva PerĂłn; ArgentinaFil: Lopez-Vazquez, Alejandra. Universidad de Sonora; MĂ©xicoFil: Loria, Dora. Instituto de OncologĂa Angel Roffo; ArgentinaFil: MĂguez, Silvia. Hospital Municipal de OncologĂa MarĂa Curie; ArgentinaFil: Moran-Mendoza, Andres de J. Hospital de Gineco-Obstetricia CMNO-IMSS; MĂ©xicoFil: Morgan-Villela, Gilberto. Hospital de Especialidades. CMNO-IMSS; MĂ©xicoFil: Mussetti, Carina. Registro Nacional de Cancer; UruguayFil: Nagai, Maria Aparecida. Instituto de Câncer de SĂŁo Paulo; BrasilFil: Oceguera-Villanueva, Antonio. Instituto Jalisciense de Cancerologia; MĂ©xicoFil: Reis, Rui M. Hospital de Câncer de Barretos; BrasilFil: Retamales, Javier. Grupo OncolĂłgico Cooperativo Chileno de InvestigaciĂłn; ChileFil: Rodriguez, Robinson. Hospital Central de las Fuerzas Armadas; UruguayFil: Rosales, Cristina, Hospital Municipal de OncologĂa MarĂa Curie; ArgentinaFil: Salas-Gonzalez, Efrain. Hospital San JosĂ©; ChileFil: Segovia, Laura. Hospital Barros Luco Trudeau; ChileFil: Sendoya, Juan M. CONICET. FundaciĂłn Instituto Leloir,; ArgentinaFil: Silva-Garcia, Aida A. OPD Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Universidad de Guadalajara; MĂ©xicoFil: Viña, Stella. Instituto de OncologĂa Angel Roffo; ArgentinaFil: Zagame, Livia. Instituto Jalisciense de Cancerologia; MĂ©xicoFil: Jones, Beth. Yale University. Yale School of Public Health; Estados UnidosFil: Szklo, MoysĂ©s. Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Estados Unido