Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) mRNA expression levels decrease after menopause in normal breast tissue but not in breast cancer lesions

We hypothesized that the regulation of microvascular functions and angiogenesis in breast tissue, a well known target of ovarian steroid action, is dependent on the hormonal exposure of the breast. Relative expression levels of VEGF-A (vascular endothelial growth factor A), a putative key regulator of angiogenesis in breast cancer, were analysed in the tumour and the adjacent non-neoplastic breast tissue of 19 breast cancer patients by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. In non-neoplastic breast specimens the expression levels of all detected VEGF-A-isoforms (189, 165, 121) were significantly higher in premenopausal compared to post-menopausal women (P = 0.02) and were inversely correlated with the patient's age (P = 0.006). In contrast, in cancerous tissues menopausal status had no influence on VEGF-A-expression levels. Benign and malignant tissues exhibited a similar expression pattern of VEGF-A-isoforms relative to each other. Thus, the regulation of the vasculature in normal breast tissue, as opposed to breast cancer tissue, appears to be hormonally dependent. Endogenous and therapeutically used hormonal steroids might, therefore, cause clinically relevant changes of the angiogenic phenotype of the human breast. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig

Biological versus chronological ovarian age:implications for assisted reproductive technology

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Women have been able to delay childbearing since effective contraception became available in the 1960s. However, fertility decreases with increasing maternal age. A slow but steady decrease in fertility is observed in women aged between 30 and 35 years, which is followed by an accelerated decline among women aged over 35 years. A combination of delayed childbearing and reduced fecundity with increasing age has resulted in an increased number and proportion of women of greater than or equal to 35 years of age seeking assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Literature searches supplemented with the authors' knowledge.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Despite major advances in medical technology, there is currently no ART treatment strategy that can fully compensate for the natural decline in fertility with increasing female age. Although chronological age is the most important predictor of ovarian response to follicle-stimulating hormone, the rate of reproductive ageing and ovarian sensitivity to gonadotrophins varies considerably among individuals. Both environmental and genetic factors contribute to depletion of the ovarian oocyte pool and reduction in oocyte quality. Thus, biological and chronological ovarian age are not always equivalent. Furthermore, biological age is more important than chronological age in predicting the outcome of ART. As older patients present increasingly for ART treatment, it will become more important to critically assess prognosis, counsel appropriately and optimize treatment strategies. Several genetic markers and biomarkers (such as anti-Müllerian hormone and the antral follicle count) are emerging that can identify women with accelerated biological ovarian ageing. Potential strategies for improving ovarian response include the use of luteinizing hormone (LH) and growth hormone (GH). When endogenous LH levels are heavily suppressed by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues, LH supplementation may help to optimize treatment outcomes for women with biologically older ovaries. Exogenous GH may improve oocyte development and counteract the age-related decline of oocyte quality. The effects of GH may be mediated by insulin-like growth factor-I, which works synergistically with follicle-stimulating hormone on granulosa and theca cells.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Patients with biologically older ovaries may benefit from a tailored approach based on individual patient characteristics. Among the most promising adjuvant therapies for improving ART outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age are the administration of exogenous LH or GH.</p

Pharmacogenetics in ovarian stimulation. Current concepts and future options.

Tailoring ovarian stimulation to the individual patient can be challenging because the ovarian response varies substantially between patients. Pharmacogenetics has emerged as a new area of research to improve the balance between desired and undesired actions of drugs, based upon the genetic predisposition of the individual patient. Clinical studies have demonstrated that the p.N680S polymorphism of the FSH-receptor gene determines the ovarian response to FSH stimulation in patients undergoing IVF. In homozygous Ser680/Ser680 type women, the FSH receptor appears to be more resistant to FSH action even in normal menstrual cycles. Therefore, genotyping of patients scheduled for ovarian stimulation could be an attractive tool to individualize FSH dosing according to genetic differences in ovarian sensitivity. More clinical studies are warranted to investigate the usefulness of genotyping for the p.N680S polymorphism as a routine diagnostic test before ovarian stimulation

Pharamkogenetik bei der ovariellen Stimulationstherapie.

not availabl

A common single nucleotide polymorphism in exon 10 of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor is a major determinant of length and hormonal dynamics of the menstrual cycle.

CONTEXT: FSH is essential for follicular maturation. Data from ovarian hyperstimulation cycles suggest that FSH action is attenuated by a frequent single nucleotide polymorphism of the FSH receptor gene exchanging Asn for Ser at codon 680. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the FSH receptor genotype influences menstrual cycle dynamics. DESIGN: Menstrual cycle was monitored from the midluteal phase through ovulation until the consecutive menstruation. SETTING: The study was conducted at the University research center. SUBJECTS: Women homozygous for the Asn680 (n = 12) and Ser680 (n = 9) variants with normal menstrual cycles volunteered for the study. INTERVENTIONS: There were no interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Follicular growth, serum LH, FSH, estradiol, progesterone, inhibin A, inhibin B and antimullerian hormone were measured. RESULTS: During the luteo-follicular transition, serum levels of estradiol, progesterone, and inhibin A were significantly lower, and FSH started to rise earlier in the Ser680/Ser680 group. FSH levels were steadily and significantly higher, and the mean area under the FSH curve was 31% greater in this group (P < 0.002). No differences were observed in estradiol, inhibin B, and growth velocities of dominant follicles. The time from luteolysis to ovulation was significantly longer in women with the Ser680/Ser680 (13.6 +/- 1.01 d) compared with Asn680/Asn680 (11.3 +/- 0.61 d, P < 0.05) genotype with a significant difference in total menstrual cycle length (29.3 vs. 27.0 d, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The FSH receptor Ser680/Ser680 genotype is associated with higher ovarian threshold to FSH, decreased negative feedback of luteal secretion to the pituitary during the intercycle transition, and longer menstrual cycles

Significance of a common single nucleotide polymorphism in exon of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene for ovarian response to FSH: a pharmacogenetic approach to control ovarian hyperstimulation.

The p.N680S sequence variation of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor gene was previously shown to influence the ovarian response to FSH in normo-ovulatory women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, we tested whether the same daily dose of FSH results in lower levels of oestradiol in women homozygous for the p.N680S sequence variation, and whether the difference can be overcome by higher FSH doses. Women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and homozygous for the wild-type or for the p.N680S FSH receptor were randomly assigned to group I (Ser/Ser, n=24), receiving an FSH dose of 150 U/day, or group II (Ser/Ser, n=25), receiving an FSH dose of 225 U/day. In group III (Asn/Asn, n=44), the FSH dose was 150 U/day. Age and basal FSH levels were not different between groups. At ovulation induction, total FSH doses were comparable in group I (1631+/-96 U) and group III (1640+/-57 U) but significantly higher in group II (2421+/-112 U) (P<0.001). Peak oestradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration were significantly lower in group I (5680+/-675 pmol/l) compared to group III (8679+/-804 pmol/l) (P=0.028). Increasing the FSH dose from 150 to 225 U/day overcame the lower oestradiol response in women with Ser/Ser (group II, 7804+/-983 pmol/l). In women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, the p.N680S sequence variation results in lower oestradiol levels following FSH stimulation. This lower FSH receptor sensitivity can be overcome by higher FSH doses

Genetic predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tSCOPUS: sh.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe