Radiation recall dermatitis after oral cyclophosphamide

peer reviewedRadiation recall dermatitis is an inflammatory skin reaction occurring in a previously irradiated field following the delivery of a promoting agent. It has been described after a number of antineoplastic agents such as gemcitabine, taxanes, anthracyclines. We report the case of a 50-year-old man with metastatic prostate cancer who developed two consecutive radiation recall dermatitis episodes triggered by oral cyclophosphamide. They occurred 4 to 5 weeks after palliative radiotherapy on bone metastasis. Spontaneous resolution was observed within 6 weeks after discontinuation of cyclophosphamide and with local supportive care. To our knowledge this is the first reported case of radiation recall dermatitis after oral cyclophosphamide

Breast cancer: role of imaging procedures to detect metastases at initial staging and during routine follow-up the first 3 years after diagnosis

peer reviewedIn our region, repeated tumor staging by radiological procedures aiming to detect relapses and/or metastases from breast cancer is frequently performed. However, these procedures are not recommended by current international guidelines. We retrospectively analyzed the charts from 818 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer seen at CHU Liege between 2005 and 2009. We assessed the role of staging procedures at initial diagnosis and during follow-up the first 3 years after the diagnosis of breast cancer. Twenty-six patients presented with metastatic disease at diagnosis and 55 patients developed loco-regional relapses or metastases during follow-up. For asymptomatic patients, imaging procedures only detected tumor metastases or relapse without elevated tumor markers in 9 patients at initial diagnosis and 10 patients during follow-up. The diagnosis of an asymptomatic relapse and/or metastases had no positive impact on progression-free or overall survival. The anatomic extension identified patients at high risk for presenting distant metastases already at the time of initial diagnosis and the biological aggressiveness evaluated by Ki-67 was an important prognostic factor for early relapse. In view of these results, we do not recommend staging and searching for metastatic disease in asymptomatic patients presenting early stage breast cancer with low expression of the Ki-67 at the time of initial diagnosis. We also do not recommend repeated staging and searching for metastases by imaging in asymptomatic patients during routine follow-up. Staging should only be performed if a relapse is suspected during follow-up.Dans nos régions, des bilans par imagerie sont régulièrement réalisés lors du diagnostic et dans le cadre du suivi d’un cancer du sein. Cependant, cette pratique est contraire aux recommandations internationales. Nous avons évalué l’intérêt d’un bilan d’extension au diagnostic et lors du suivi, jusqu’à 3 ans après le diagnostic, de 818 patients atteints de cancer du sein pris en charge au CHU de Liège entre 2005 et 2009. Vingt-six patients présentaient des métastases au diagnostic et 55 rechutes locorégionales ou systémiques ont été observées. Pour les patients asymptomatiques, l’imagerie seule a identifié la dissémination à distance et/ou la rechute locorégionale chez 9 patients au diagnostic et 10 patients dans le cadre du suivi. La découverte d’une rechute et/ou d’une dissémination métastatique asymptomatique n’a pas eu d’impact favorable sur la survie sans progression ou la survie globale. L’extension anatomique au diagnostic identifie les patients à risque de présenter une maladie directement métastatique tandis que l’agressivité biologique, évaluée par le Ki-67, est un facteur de risque important pour la rechute précoce. Suite aux résultats obtenus, nous déconseillons de réaliser un bilan d’extension à la recherche de métastases au moment du diagnostic pour les cancers du sein asymptomatiques à un stade précoce avec un Ki-67 peu élevé. Nous déconseillons également la réalisation régulière d’un bilan d’extension par imagerie à la recherche de métastases chez les patients asymptomatiques. Un bilan est à réaliser dans le cadre du suivi uniquement si une rechute est suspectée

Cancer du sein : de la thérapie ciblée à la médecine personnalisée

peer reviewedDans cet article, les auteurs passent en revue les grands principes de prise en charge du traitement systémique du cancer du sein et posent la question suivante : jusqu'où réellement aujourd'hui ce traitement est-il individualisé ? Les nouvelles technologies permettent une analyse détaillée des anomalies génomiques au niveau des cellules cancéreuses. Malheureusement, nous n'avons pas encore compris comment utiliser au mieux ces données au bénéfice du patient. La majorité des modifications du génome sont des évènements relativement rares compliquant le développement de nouveaux médicaments dans le cadre d'une médecine de précision. De plus, les tumeurs présentent une grande hétérogénéité temporelle et spatiale dont il faudra tenir compte lors de ce développement. Une collaboration internationale intensive est en cours pour tenter de confirmer que la médecine de précision permet d'optimiser les résultats du traitement systémique dans le cancer du sein

Granulomatous Reactions from Tattoos Following BRAF Inhibitor Therapy

BRAF inhibitors may present several cutaneous adverse effects, including actinic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, rashes, increased photosensitivity, panniculitis, palmoplantar and capillary involvement, pruritus and xerosis as well as granulomatous reactions. A 30-year-old patient with multiple tattoos received dabrafenib and trametinib for metastatic melanoma. After 4 months, he developed an induration and thickening strictly limited to several tattoos. Histopathology revealed nonnecrotizing granulomas in the dermis. Topical steroids relieved pruritus but not the granulomatous aspect of the tattoos. As far as we know, this is the first description of granulomatous reactions restricted to preexisting tattoos following BRAF inhibitor therapy

Erdheim-Chester disease : a case report

We report the case of a 47-year-old woman with unexplained inflammatory syndrome and asthenia. Imaging findings show bilateral abnormalities of femurs and tibias, suggesting an Erdheim-Chester disease, which is confirmed by a bone marrow biopsy of the left femur. The BRAF V600E mutation is detected, allowing the administration of targeted therapies such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors that lead to the improvement of symptoms

Real-World Effectiveness, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Nivolumab for Melanoma in Belgium and Luxembourg: Results of PRESERV MEL

peer reviewedBackground: Nivolumab, an anti–programmed cell death 1 immuno-oncology therapy, is approved as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma. PRESERV MEL (Prospective and REtrospective Study of nivolumab thERapy in adjuVant MELanoma) is a real-world observational study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant nivolumab in patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma in clinical practice in Belgium and Luxembourg. Methods: Patients were enrolled prospectively and retrospectively during a 2-year period (January 2019–January 2021), and will be followed for 5 years. The results reported here are for the second interim analysis (cutoff date 31 December 2021). The index date was the date of first administration of adjuvant nivolumab. Patients received nivolumab for up to 12 months per label. Outcomes included relapse-free survival (RFS), adverse events (AEs)/treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; assessed in prospectively enrolled patients using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Melanoma (FACT-M), and EQ-5D-3L instruments). HRQoL was evaluated at group level (mean change in scores from baseline based on minimally important differences) and individual patient level (percentage of patients with clinically important scores based on threshold of clinical importance). Outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Results: The study enrolled 152 patients (125 prospective, 27 retrospective) at 15 hospitals in Belgium and Luxembourg. Minimum potential follow-up at time of analysis was 11.4 months. Median age was 60 years (range 29–85), and 53% of patients were male. At 12 and 18 months, the RFS rates were 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.9–80.9) and 68.4% (95% CI: 60.0–75.5), respectively. Median RFS was not reached. Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were reported in 14% of patients. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 23% of patients. Deaths occurred in 3% of patients and were not related to treatment. Questionnaire completion rates for HRQoL were high at baseline (90–94%) and at 24 months (78–81%). In the group-level analysis for HRQoL, mean changes in scores from baseline remained stable and did not exceed prespecified thresholds for minimally important differences during and after treatment, except for a clinically meaningful improvement in FACT-M surgery subscale scores. In the individual patient-level analysis for EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the percentages of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for fatigue and cognitive impairment increased during treatment (at 9 months) compared with baseline. After treatment cessation (at 18 months), the percentage of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for fatigue decreased. However, the percentages of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for emotional, cognitive, and social impairment increased at 18 months compared with during treatment. Most patients with emotional impairment at 9 and 18 months did not experience disease recurrence (91% and 89%, respectively). Conclusions: These results confirm the real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma. Cancer-specific, disease-specific, and generic HRQoL were maintained during and after treatment. The percentage of patients reporting emotional and cognitive impairment increased after treatment cessation, emphasizing the need for further investigation and tailored supportive care in these patients

Oncological patients' reactions to COVID-19 pandemic: A single institution prospective study.

peer reviewedBACKGROUND: The spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid reorganization in all human and hospital activities, with impact on cancer patients. AIM: An analysis of cancer patients fears, and awareness of COVID-19 has been done in this study. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed cancer patients' reactions to the pandemic and their perception of oncological care reorganization, through a 12-item survey, proposed at the peak of pandemic and 3 months later. Overall, 237 patients were included in the study. During the peak of pandemic 34.6% of patients were more worried about COVID-19 than cancer versus 26.4% in the post-acute phase (p = .013). Although 49.8% of patients in the acute phase and 42.3% in the post-acute phase considered their risk of death if infected ≥50%, and more than 70% of patients thought to be at higher risk of complications, the majority of them did not consider the possibility to stop or delay their treatment. Patients were more interested in following news about COVID-19 than cancer and they complied with all preventive measures in more than 90% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer patients worried about COVID-19 and evaluated the risk of complication or death due to COVID-19 as extremely high, they were still asking for the best oncological treatment

Use of mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer: an evaluation of factors that influence patient outcomes.

Many systemic treatment options are available for advanced breast cancer, including endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy, and other targeted agents. Recently, everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, combined with exemestane, an aromatase inhibitor, has been approved in Europe and the USA for patients suffering from estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated by a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor, based on the results of BOLERO-2 (Breast cancer trials of OraL EveROlimus). This study showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in median progression-free survival. Results concerning the impact on overall survival are expected in the near future. This clinically oriented review focuses on the use of mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer. Results reported with first-generation mTOR inhibitors (ridaforolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus) are discussed. The current and potential role of mTOR inhibitors is reported according to breast cancer subtype (estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative, triple-negative, and HER2-positive ER-positive/negative disease). Everolimus is currently being evaluated in the adjuvant setting in high-risk estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. Continuing mTOR inhibition or alternatively administering other drugs targeting the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B-mTOR pathway after progression on treatments including an mTOR inhibitor is under evaluation. Potential biomarkers to select patients showing a more pronounced benefit are reviewed, but we are not currently using these biomarkers in routine practice. Subgroup analysis of BOLERO 2 has shown that the benefit is consistent in all subgroups and that it is impossible to select patients not benefiting from addition of everolimus to exemestane. Side effects and impact on quality of life are other important issues discussed in this review. Second-generation mTOR inhibitors and dual mTOR-phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibitors are currently being evaluated in clinical trials

How I explore... a cutaneous metastasis. What are you, from where are you coming from?

peer reviewedCutaneous metastases may accompany up to 3 to 10% of all malignancies. They are usually identified after diagnosing the primary neoplasm. However, their disclosure can be synchronous, or the metastasis may be the initial finding qualified as "precocious". The identification of the primary neoplasm sometimes proves to be difficult. Gender of the patient, the aspect and distribution of the metastases, as well as the histological and immunohistological examinations help establishing the diagnosis. The prognosis of the metastatic disease is often poor

Malignant melanoma: conceptual and therapeutic innovations based on translational research

peer reviewedThe scientific information about melanoma is on the rise. It has a direct impact on the diagnostic acuteness and on the therapeutic management. The most recent aspects of the utmost importance are presented. The concept of the duality between fast-growing (high malignancy) and slow-growing (reduced malignancy) melanoma is stressed. A new international multicentric approach using adjuvant therapy for stage III melanomas involves the clinical oncology department of the CHU of Liege. It concerns a targeted immunotherapy directed to the Mage A3 protein