Mother's occupation and sex ratio at birth

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many women are working outside of the home, occupying a multitude of jobs with varying degrees of responsibilities and levels of psychological stress. We investigated whether different job types in women are associated with child sex at birth, with the hypothesis that women in job types, which are categorized as "high psychological stress" jobs, would be more likely to give birth to a daughter than a son, as females are less vulnerable to unfavourable conditions during conception, pregnancy and after parturition, and are less costly to carry to term.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We investigated the effects of mother's age, maternal and paternal job type (and associated psychological stress levels) and paternal income on sex ratio at birth. Our analyses were based on 16,384 incidences of birth from a six-year (2000 to 2005 inclusive) childbirth dataset from Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge, UK. We obtained a restricted data set from Addenbrooke's hospital with: maternal age, maternal and paternal occupations, and whether or not the child was first-born.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Women in job types that were categorized as "high stress" were more likely to give birth to daughters, whereas women in job types that were categorized as "low stress" had equal sex ratios or a slight male bias in offspring. We also investigated whether maternal age, and her partner's income could be associated with reversed offspring sex ratio. We found no association between mother's age, her partner's job stress category or partner income on child sex. However, there was an important interaction between job stress category and partner income in some of the analyses. Partner income appears to attenuate the association between maternal job stress and sex ratios at moderate-income levels, and reverse it at high-income levels.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>To our knowledge this is the first report on the association between women's job type stress categories and offspring sex ratio in humans, and the potential mitigating effect of their partners' income.</p

Purinergic mechanisms in the control of gastrointestinal motility

For many years, ATP and adenosine have been implicated in movement regulation of the gastrointestinal tract. They act through three major receptor subtypes: adenosine or P1 receptors, P2X receptors and P2Y receptors. Each of these major receptor types can be subdivided into several different classes and is widely distributed amongst various neurons, muscle types, glia and interstitial cells that regulate intestinal functions. Several key roles for the different receptors and their endogenous ligands have been identified in physiological and pharmacological studies. For example, adenosine acting at A1 receptors appears to inhibit intestinal motility in various pathological conditions. Similarly, ATP acting at P2Y receptors is an important component of inhibitory neuromuscular transmission, acting as a cotransmitter with nitric oxide. ATP acting at P2X and P2Y1 receptors is important for synaptic transmission in simple descending excitatory and inhibitory reflex pathways. Some P2Y receptor subtypes prefer uridine nucleotides over purine nucleotides. Thus, roles for UTP and UDP as enteric transmitters in place of ATP cannot be excluded. ATP also appears to be important for sensory transduction, especially in chemosensitive pathways that initiate local inhibitory reflexes. Despite this evidence, data are lacking about the roles of either adenosine or ATP in more complex motility patterns such as segmentation or the interdigestive migrating motor complex. Clarification of roles for purinergic transmission in these common, but understudied, motility patterns will depend on the use of subtype-specific antagonists that in some cases have not yet been developed