Intraâ abdominal chylovenous bypass treats retroperitoneal lymphangiomatosis

BackgroundRetroperitoneal lymphangiomatosis (RL) is a rare form of primary lymphedema featuring aberrant retroperitoneal lymphatic proliferation. It causes recurrent cellulitis, repeated interventions, and poor life quality. This study aimed to investigate proper diagnositc criteria and surgical outcomes for RL with extremity lymphedema.MethodsBetween 2012 and 2018, 44 primary lowerâ extremity lymphedema cases received lymphoscintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, and singleâ photon electron computed tomography to detect RL. RL patients underwent vascularized lymph node transfers (VLNT) for extremity lymphedema and intraâ abdominal sideâ toâ end chylovenous bypasses (CVB) for chylous ascites. Complications, CVB patency, and quality of life were evaluated postoperatively.ResultsSix RL patients (mean age of 30.3 years) had chylous ascites with five had lowerâ extremity lymphedema. All CVBs remained patent, though one required reâ anastomosis, giving a 100% patency rate. Four unilateral and one bilateral extremity lymphedema underwent six VLNTs with 100% flap survival. Patients reported improved quality of life (Pâ =â 0.023), decreased cellulitis incidence (Pâ =â 0.041), and improved mean lymphedema circumference (Pâ =â 0.043). All patients resumed a normal diet and activity.ConclusionsEvaluating primary lowerâ extremity lymphedema patients with MRI and SPECT could reveal a 13.6% prevalence of RL and guide treatment of refractory extremity lymphedema. Intraâ abdominal CVB with VLNT effectively treated RL with chylous ascites and extremity lymphedema.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152842/1/jso25514.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152842/2/jso25514_am.pd

Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cancer sites other than the colon and rectum: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have consistently shown that aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is associated with a close to 50% reduced risk of colorectal cancer. Studies assessing the effects of NSAIDs on other cancers have shown conflicting results. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between NSAID use and cancer other than colorectal. METHODS: We performed a search in Medline (from 1966 to 2002) and identified a total of 47 articles (13 cohort and 34 case-control studies). Overall estimates of the relative risk (RR) were calculated for each cancer site using random effects models. RESULTS: Aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk of cancer of the esophagus and the stomach (RR, 0.51; 95%CI (0.38–0.69), and 0.73; 95%CI (0.63–0.84)). Use of NSAIDs was similarly associated with a lower risk of esophageal and gastric cancers (RR,0.65; 95% CI(0.46–0.92) and RR,0.54; 95%CI (0.39–0.75)). Among other cancers, only the results obtained for breast cancer were fairly consistent in showing a slight reduced risk among NSAID and aspirin users (RR, 0.77; 95%CI (0.66–0.88), and RR, 0.77; 95%CI (0.69–0.86) respectively)). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that the potential chemopreventive role of NSAIDs in colorectal cancer might be extended to other gastrointestinal cancers such as esophagus and stomach. Further research is required to evaluate the role of NSAIDs at other cancers sites