3 research outputs found

    Biomechanics of bone-fracture fixation by stiffness-graded plates in comparison with stainless-steel plates

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: In the internal fixation of fractured bone by means of bone-plates fastened to the bone on its tensile surface, an on-going concern has been the excessive stress-shielding of the bone by the excessively-stiff stainless-steel plate. The compressive stress-shielding at the fracture-interface immediately after fracture-fixation delays callus formation and bone healing. Likewise, the tensile stress-shielding of the layer of the bone underneath the plate can cause osteoporosis and decrease in tensile strength of this layer. METHOD: In order to address this problem, we propose to use stiffness-graded plates. Accordingly, we have computed (by finite-element analysis) the stress distribution in the fractured bone fixed by composite plates, whose stiffness is graded both longitudinally and transversely. RESULTS: It can be seen that the stiffness-graded composite-plates cause less stress-shielding (as an example: at 50% of the healing stage, stress at the fracture interface is compressive in nature i.e. 0.002 GPa for stainless steel plate whereas stiffness graded plates provides tensile stress of 0.002 GPa. This means that stiffness graded plate is allowing the 50% healed bone to participate in loadings). Stiffness-graded plates are more flexible, and hence permit more bending of the fractured bone. This results in higher compressive stresses induced at the fractured faces accelerate bone-healing. On the other hand, away from the fracture interface the reduced stiffness and elastic modulus of the plate causes the neutral axis of the composite structure to be lowered into the bone resulting in the higher tensile stress in the bone-layer underneath the plate, wherein is conducive to the bone preserving its tensile strength. CONCLUSION: Stiffness graded plates (with in-built variable stiffness) are deemed to offer less stress-shielding to the bone, providing higher compressive stress at the fractured interface (to induce accelerated healing) as well as higher tensile stress in the intact portion of the bone (to prevent bone remodeling and osteoporosis)

    Effects of the neuroactive steroid allopregnanolone on intracranial self-stimulation in C57BL/6J Mice

    No full text
    RATIONALE: The neuroactive steroid (3α,5α)-3-hydroxy-pregnan-20-one (3α,5α-THP, allopregnanolone) has effects on reward-related behaviors in mice and rats that suggest that it may activate brain reward circuits. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is an operant behavioral technique that detects changes in the sensitivity of brain reward circuitry following drug administration. OBJECTIVE: to examine the effects of the neuroactive steroid allopregnanolone on ICSS and to compare these effects to those of cocaine. METHODS: Male C57BL/6J mice implanted with stimulating electrodes implanted into the medial forebrain bundle responded for reinforcement by electrical stimulation (brain stimulation reward, BSR). Mice received cocaine (n=11, 3.0 – 30.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or the neuroactive steroid allopregnanolone (n=11, 3.0 – 17.0 mg/kg, i.p.). BSR thresholds (θ(0)) and maximum operant response rates (MAX) after drug treatments were compared to those after vehicle injections. RESULTS: Cocaine and allopregnanolone dose dependently lowered BSR thresholds relative to vehicle injections. Cocaine was maximally effective (80 % reduction) in the second 15 minutes following the 30 mg/kg dose, while allopregnanolone was maximally effective (30% reduction) 15-45 minutes after the 17 mg/kg dose. Neither drug had significant effects on MAX response rates. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of allopregnanolone on BSR thresholds are consistent with the previously reported effects of benzodiazepines and alcohol suggesting that positive modulation of GABA(A) receptors can facilitate reward-related behaviors in C57BL/6J mice
    corecore