Intensive consolidation therapy compared with standard consolidation and maintenance therapy for adults with acute myeloid leukaemia aged between 46 and 60 years: final results of the randomized phase III study (AML 8B) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell’Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups

The most effective post-remission treatment to maintain complete remission (CR) in adults aged between 46 and 60 years with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is uncertain. Previously untreated patients with AML in CR after induction chemotherapy with daunorubicin and cytarabine were randomized between two intensive courses of consolidation therapy containing high-dose cytarabine, combined with amsacrine or daunorubicin and a standard consolidation and maintenance therapy containing standard dose cytarabine and daunorubicin. One hundred fifty-eight CR patients were assigned to the intensive group and 157 patients to the standard group. After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, the 4-year survival rate was 32 % in the intensive group versus 34 % in the standard group (P = 0.29). In the intensive group, the 4-year relapse incidence was lower than in the standard group: 55 and 75 %, respectively (P = 0.0003), whereas treatment-related mortality incidence was higher: 22 versus 3 % (P < 0.0001). Two intensive consolidation courses containing high-dose cytarabine as post-remission treatment in patients with AML aged between 46 and 60 years old did not translate in better long-term outcome despite a 20 % lower relapse incidence. Better supportive care and prevention of treatment-related complications may improve the overall survival after intensified post-remission therapy in this age group

Centre effect on treatment outcome for patients with untreated acute myelogenous leukaemia? An analysis of the AML 8A study of the Leukemia Cooperative Group of the EORTC and GIMEMA

In the AML 8A study patients were treated with remission-induction therapy followed by one consolidation course. Patients in complete remission (CR) were randomised between autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) and a second intensive consolidation course, except for those with a histocompatible sibling donor, who received allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT). This analysis was performed to determine whether centres which only performed induction and consolidation therapy, achieved similar results as centres who also performed transplantation. 542/676 (80%) from transplantation centres and 150/194 (77%) from referring centres achieved CR, with an early death rate of 5% and 11%, respectively (P = 0.01). 66% of patients with a donor from transplantation centres received alloBMT in first CR compared with 57% from referring centres (P = 0.2), Transplantation centres randomised 64% of patients without a donor, referring centres 47% (P = 0.04). The full protocol treatment was completed by 275/542 (51%) and 61/150 (41%) patients, respectively (P = 0.04). The overall survival rate at 6 years from diagnosis was 34% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.9). In conclusion, the type of centre did not appear to have an influence on overall survival. The feasibility of the study was acceptable for both types of centres. The referring centres applied more selection for transplantation. Despite a more intensive second-line treatment at transplantation centres, the overall outcome remained similar to that of referring centres. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

The influence of HLA-matched sibling donor availability on treatment outcome for patients with AML: an analysis of the AML 8A study of the EORTC Leukaemia Cooperative Group and GIMEMA

To determine whether patients with a HLA-identical sibling donor have a better outcome than patients without a donor, an analysis on the basis of intention-to-treat principles was performed within the framework of the EORTC-GIMEMA randomized phase III AML 8A trial. Patients in complete remission (CR) received one intensive consolidation course. Patients with a histocompatible sibling donor were then allocated allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT). the patients without a donor were randomized between autologous BMT (ABMT) and a second intensive consolidation (IC2). 831 patients 8 weeks from diagnosis were included. HLA typing was performed in 672 patients. AlloBMT was performed during CR1 in 180 (61%) out of 295 patients with a donor. Another 38 patients were allografted: ave in resistant disease, 14 during relapse and 19 in CR2, ABMT was performed in 130 (34%) out of 377 patients without a donor in CR1, in six: (2%) patients during relapse and in 38 (10%) patients during CR2. The disease-free survival (DFS) from CR for patients with a donor was significantly longer than for patients without a donor (46% v 33% at 6 years; P = 0.01, RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.96). The overall survival from diagnosis for patients with a donor was longer, but not statistically significant, than for patients without a donor (48% v 40% at 6 years; logrank P= 0.24). When patients were stratified according to prognostic risk groups, the same trend in favour of patients with a donor was seen for survival duration and the DFS remained significantly longer for this group of patients

Analysing policy failure as an argumentative strategy in the policymaking process: A pragmatist perspective

International audienceThe purpose of this article is to focus on policy failure as a concept that stakeholders use. Our article will first address how researchers define failure to explore some different dimensions of the concept. Second, we will highlight the political and subjective dimension relative to how policymakers use the concept of failure as critical judgement. Last, we will show that while failure is a critical judgement, it should not be overlooked by researchers seeking to understand the policy process. In this article, we argue that stakeholders’ production and use of critical judgement play a fundamental role in policymaking

Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia

SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe