28 research outputs found

    Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: An international case-cohort study

    Get PDF
    We conducted an international study of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnosis among a large group of physicians and compared their diagnostic performance to a panel of IPF experts. A total of 1141 respiratory physicians and 34 IPF experts participated. Participants evaluated 60 cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) without interdisciplinary consultation. Diagnostic agreement was measured using the weighted kappa coefficient (\u3baw). Prognostic discrimination between IPF and other ILDs was used to validate diagnostic accuracy for first-choice diagnoses of IPF and were compared using the Cindex. A total of 404 physicians completed the study. Agreement for IPF diagnosis was higher among expert physicians (\u3baw=0.65, IQR 0.53-0.72, p20 years of experience (C-index=0.72, IQR 0.0-0.73, p=0.229) and non-university hospital physicians with more than 20 years of experience, attending weekly MDT meetings (C-index=0.72, IQR 0.70-0.72, p=0.052), did not differ significantly (p=0.229 and p=0.052 respectively) from the expert panel (C-index=0.74 IQR 0.72-0.75). Experienced respiratory physicians at university-based institutions diagnose IPF with similar prognostic accuracy to IPF experts. Regular MDT meeting attendance improves the prognostic accuracy of experienced non-university practitioners to levels achieved by IPF experts

    Clinical factors involved in the recurrence of pituitary adenomas after surgical remission: a structured review and meta-analysis

    Full text link

    The risks of overlooking the diagnosis of secreting pituitary adenomas

    Full text link

    Prevalence and clinical features of the ectopic ACTH syndrome in patients with gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic neuroendocrine tumors

    No full text
    Objective: Several series report on the relative contribution of ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS) in the spectrum of Cushing's syndrome. However, prevalence of EAS in patients with thoracic or gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is currently unknown. Design: We assessed, in a tertiary referral center, the prevalence of EAS in a large cohort of thoracic and GEP-NET patients including clinical, biochemical, and radiological features; management; and treatment outcome. Methods: In total, 918 patients with thoracic or GEP-NETs were studied (1993-2012). Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and small cell lung carcinoma patients were excluded. Differentiation between synchronous, metachronous, and cyclic occurrence of EAS was made. Results: Out of the 918 patients with thoracic and GEP-NETs (469 males and 449 females; median age 58.7 years (range: 17.3-87.3)), 29 patients (3.2%) had EAS (ten males and 19 females; median age 48.1 years (range: 24.7-77.9)). EAS occurred synchronously in 23 patients (79%), metachronously in four patients (14%), and cyclical in two patients (7%) respectively. NETs causing EAS included lung/bronchus (n=9), pancreatic (n=9), and thymic (n=4). In four patients, the cause of EAS was unknown (n=4). Median overall survival (OS) of non-EAS thoracic and GEP-NET patients was 61.2 months (range: 0.6-249.4). Median OS of EAS patients was 41.4 months (range: 2.2-250.9). After comparison, only the first 5-year survival was significantly shorter (P=0.013) in EAS patients. Conclusion: Prevalence of EAS in this large cohort of patients with thoracic and GEP-NETs was 3.2%. EAS was mostly caused by thoracic and pancreatic NETs. First 5-year survival of EAS patients was shorter compared with non-EAS patients
    corecore