9 research outputs found
Counting Popular Matchings in House Allocation Problems
We study the problem of counting the number of popular matchings in a given
instance. A popular matching instance consists of agents A and houses H, where
each agent ranks a subset of houses according to their preferences. A matching
is an assignment of agents to houses. A matching M is more popular than
matching M' if the number of agents that prefer M to M' is more than the number
of people that prefer M' to M. A matching M is called popular if there exists
no matching more popular than M. McDermid and Irving gave a poly-time algorithm
for counting the number of popular matchings when the preference lists are
strictly ordered.
We first consider the case of ties in preference lists. Nasre proved that the
problem of counting the number of popular matching is #P-hard when there are
ties. We give an FPRAS for this problem.
We then consider the popular matching problem where preference lists are
strictly ordered but each house has a capacity associated with it. We give a
switching graph characterization of popular matchings in this case. Such
characterizations were studied earlier for the case of strictly ordered
preference lists (McDermid and Irving) and for preference lists with ties
(Nasre). We use our characterization to prove that counting popular matchings
in capacitated case is #P-hard
Social Welfare in One-sided Matching Markets without Money
We study social welfare in one-sided matching markets where the goal is to
efficiently allocate n items to n agents that each have a complete, private
preference list and a unit demand over the items. Our focus is on allocation
mechanisms that do not involve any monetary payments. We consider two natural
measures of social welfare: the ordinal welfare factor which measures the
number of agents that are at least as happy as in some unknown, arbitrary
benchmark allocation, and the linear welfare factor which assumes an agent's
utility linearly decreases down his preference lists, and measures the total
utility to that achieved by an optimal allocation. We analyze two matching
mechanisms which have been extensively studied by economists. The first
mechanism is the random serial dictatorship (RSD) where agents are ordered in
accordance with a randomly chosen permutation, and are successively allocated
their best choice among the unallocated items. The second mechanism is the
probabilistic serial (PS) mechanism of Bogomolnaia and Moulin [8], which
computes a fractional allocation that can be expressed as a convex combination
of integral allocations. The welfare factor of a mechanism is the infimum over
all instances. For RSD, we show that the ordinal welfare factor is
asymptotically 1/2, while the linear welfare factor lies in the interval [.526,
2/3]. For PS, we show that the ordinal welfare factor is also 1/2 while the
linear welfare factor is roughly 2/3. To our knowledge, these results are the
first non-trivial performance guarantees for these natural mechanisms
Popular matchings in the marriage and roommates problems
Popular matchings have recently been a subject of study in the context of the so-called House Allocation Problem, where the objective is to match applicants to houses over which the applicants have preferences. A matching M is called popular if there is no other matching MâČ with the property that more applicants prefer their allocation in MâČ to their allocation in M. In this paper we study popular matchings in the context of the Roommates Problem, including its special (bipartite) case, the Marriage Problem. We investigate the relationship between popularity and stability, and describe efficient algorithms to test a matching for popularity in these settings. We also show that, when ties are permitted in the preferences, it is NP-hard to determine whether a popular matching exists in both the Roommates and Marriage cases
On Popular Random Assignments
One of the most fundamental and ubiquitous problems in microeconomics and operations research is how to assign objects to agents based on their individual preferences. An assignment is called popular if there is no other assignment that is preferred by a majority of the agents. Popular assignments need not exist, but the minimax theorem implies the existence of popular random assignments. In this paper, we study the compatibility of popularity with other properties that have been considered in the literature on random assignments, namely efficiency, equal treatment of equals, envy-freeness, and strategyproofness