Yield and protein response to N fertilization by different cultivars of spring and durum wheat

Non-Peer ReviewedA field study to determine whether there were differences in the response of CWAD and CWRS wheat to N fertilization was conducted in two soils of southwestern Saskatchewan for four years. Using regression techniques we were able to establish that both wheat classes had the same grain yield and protein concentration response to N availability, and that the differences in grain yield and protein concentration between classes observed in the study arose from differences in the response of the classes to available water. Differences in response to water availability among cultivars within each class were too small to be of practical significance. Recommendations for N fertilization of CWAD and CWRS wheats should be based on an N response common to both wheat classes, and on the ratio of the price of wheat to the cost of fertilizer N for each class

The effect of leaf spots on yield and quality of wheat in southern Saskatchewan

Non-Peer ReviewedAlthough leaf spots have been reported to have a negative effect on yield and quality, the magnitude of the effect of leaf spots on grain yield and quality of wheat cultivars grown on dryland in southern Saskatchewan is not known. Experiments were conducted at Swift Current (Brown soil) and Indian Head (Black soil) for three years to determine effects of leaf spots on grain yield, kernel weight, test weight and protein concentration of wheat. Two fungicides, Folicur 3.6F and Bravo 500 were applied at different growth stages in order to diversify the severity of leaf spots. Three common wheat (T. aestivum L.) cultivars - AC Domain, Laura and AC Elsa and three durum wheat (T. turgidum L. var durum) cultivars with different levels of leaf spot susceptibility were used in this study. The control of leaf spots by fungicides often did not cause an increase of yield, kernel weight, test weight or grain protein concentration in the drier Prairies where yield potential is relatively low. Fungicide treatments significantly increased yield in only two of six location-years (Folicur applied at head emergence in 1997 (0.07-0.13 t ha-1) (P < 0.05) and Folicur applied at flag emergence and/or head emergence in 1998 (0.41-0.47 t ha-1) (P < 0.001) at Indian Head. Fungicide applications significantly increased kernel weight in only three of six location-years (applications at flag leaf emergence at Swift Current (0.8-1.1 mg) (P < 0.05) and Indian Head (1.8-2.0 mg) (P < 0.001) in 1998 and at Indian Head in 1999 (10-1.1 mg) (P < 0.01). An increase of grain protein concentration was only found in treatments of Bravo applications at Indian Head in 1998 (0.3-0.7%) (P < 0.001). It seems that the control of leaf spots tended to have higher effect on yield and quality at Indian Head than Swift Current, it could be attributed to better controls of leaf spots at early milk stage (P < 0.001) and/or higher yield potential at Indian Head (P < 0.001). Although the cultivars used in this study have different leaf spot susceptibility (P < 0.001), there were no consistent cultivar differences in the effectiveness of the fungicides on control of leaf spots and on the yield, kernel weight and other quality characteristics. Leaf spots are a common and potentially severe foliar disease of wheat. Many studies have reported that leaf spots have a negative effect on grain yield (Eyal and Ziv, 1974; King, et al., 1983; McKendry and Henke, 1994), test weight (Milus, 1994) and milling quality (Mckendry et al., 1995), especially under environments favorable for the development of leaf spots or under intensive management such as irrigation (Duczek and Jones-Flory, 1994) and high N fertilizer rates (Howard, et al., 1994). In the past decade there has been an increase in the incidence of leaf spotting diseases of wheat in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. These are attributed mainly to Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (tan spot), Septoria nodorum and S. tritici (septoria leaf blotch complex) and all current spring wheat cultivars are susceptible to this disease complex - 333 - (Fernandez, et al., 1996; Fernandez, et al., 1998). Consequently there is increased pressure on producers to chemically control diseases that might affect yield and quality. The magnitude of the impact of leaf spots on grain yield and quality of wheat cultivars grown on dryland in this area, however, is not known. Research on these issues is therefore necessary to provide informed guidelines for use by producers. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of leaf spots on grain yield, kernel weight, test weight and protein concentration of spring common (T. aestivum L.) and durum (T. turgidum L. var durum) wheat in southern Saskatchewan

The effect of leaf spots on yield and quality of wheat in southern Saskatchewan

Non-Peer ReviewedAlthough leaf spots have been reported to have a negative effect on yield and quality, the magnitude of the effect of leaf spots on grain yield and quality of wheat cultivars grown on dryland in southern Saskatchewan is not known. Experiments were conducted at Swift Current (Brown soil) and Indian Head (Black soil) for three years to determine effects of leaf spots on grain yield, kernel weight, test weight and protein concentration of wheat. Two fungicides, Folicur 3.6F and Bravo 500 were applied at different growth stages in order to diversify the severity of leaf spots. Three common wheat (T. aestivum L.) cultivars - AC Domain, Laura and AC Elsa and three durum wheat (T. turgidum L. var durum) cultivars with different levels of leaf spot susceptibility were used in this study. The control of leaf spots by fungicides often did not cause an increase of yield, kernel weight, test weight or grain protein concentration in the drier Prairies where yield potential is relatively low. Fungicide treatments significantly increased yield in only two of six location-years (Folicur applied at head emergence in 1997 (0.07-0.13 t ha-1) (P < 0.05) and Folicur applied at flag emergence and/or head emergence in 1998 (0.41-0.47 t ha-1) (P < 0.001) at Indian Head. Fungicide applications significantly increased kernel weight in only three of six location-years (applications at flag leaf emergence at Swift Current (0.8-1.1 mg) (P < 0.05) and Indian Head (1.8-2.0 mg) (P < 0.001) in 1998 and at Indian Head in 1999 (10-1.1 mg) (P < 0.01). An increase of grain protein concentration was only found in treatments of Bravo applications at Indian Head in 1998 (0.3-0.7%) (P < 0.001). It seems that the control of leaf spots tended to have higher effect on yield and quality at Indian Head than Swift Current, it could be attributed to better controls of leaf spots at early milk stage (P < 0.001) and/or higher yield potential at Indian Head (P < 0.001). Although the cultivars used in this study have different leaf spot susceptibility (P < 0.001), there were no consistent cultivar differences in the effectiveness of the fungicides on control of leaf spots and on the yield, kernel weight and other quality characteristics. Leaf spots are a common and potentially severe foliar disease of wheat. Many studies have reported that leaf spots have a negative effect on grain yield (Eyal and Ziv, 1974; King, et al., 1983; McKendry and Henke, 1994), test weight (Milus, 1994) and milling quality (Mckendry et al., 1995), especially under environments favorable for the development of leaf spots or under intensive management such as irrigation (Duczek and Jones-Flory, 1994) and high N fertilizer rates (Howard, et al., 1994). In the past decade there has been an increase in the incidence of leaf spotting diseases of wheat in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. These are attributed mainly to Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (tan spot), Septoria nodorum and S. tritici (septoria leaf blotch complex) and all current spring wheat cultivars are susceptible to this disease complex - 333 - (Fernandez, et al., 1996; Fernandez, et al., 1998). Consequently there is increased pressure on producers to chemically control diseases that might affect yield and quality. The magnitude of the impact of leaf spots on grain yield and quality of wheat cultivars grown on dryland in this area, however, is not known. Research on these issues is therefore necessary to provide informed guidelines for use by producers. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of leaf spots on grain yield, kernel weight, test weight and protein concentration of spring common (T. aestivum L.) and durum (T. turgidum L. var durum) wheat in southern Saskatchewan

Do high-yield and high-protein wheat cultivars use more water?

Non-Peer ReviewedSome recently developed wheat cultivars have significantly increased yields, while maintaining or even increasing protein content, relative to earlier cultivars. Such cultivars, which meet the demands of the lucrative quality-conscious world markets, have made a substantial contribution to the value of wheat production in western Canada. In order to understand the physiological basis for these genetic improvements we are conducting a multiyear study. Results of this study could be used by breeders to select new cultivars more efficiently and by producers to improve their soil and crop management. In this report we describe cultivar differences in evapotranspiration (ET) and water use efficiency (WUE) from the experiment in 1998 and 1999 at Swift Current, Saskatchewan

Physiological characteristics of high-yielding and high-protein wheats in Canadian prairies: water use and water use efficiency

Non-Peer ReviewedThe moisture condition in the Canadian prairies is often not favourable to wheat growth especially during grain-filling stage (McCaig and Clarke, 1995) because of the limited precipitation, high temperature and high wind speed. Under this environment, new cultivars with both high yield and high protein concentration should have either higher evapotranspiration (ET) or higher water use efficiency (WUE), or both relative to old low- yielding cultivars. Few studies have been done to compare water use among wheat cultivars released at different periods of breeding (Slafer et al., 1993). Research conducted in Australia revealed that new high-yielding cultivars had higher WUE which was attributed to higher grain yield and higher harvest index, while ET did not change (Siddique et al., 1990a) or was even reduced (Siddique et al., 1990b). In a comparative study in the Canadian prairies, Cutforth et al. (1988) found that four wheat cultivars ( two common wheat and two durum cultivars), which were different significantly in yield, did not differ in ET. Similarly, McNeal et al. (1971) found no difference in ET among five wheat varieties, which were different in height. The objective of this study was to estimate the differences between old cultivars and new high-yielding and high-protein cultivars in ET and WUE in the Canadian prairies

What kind of wheat cultivar should I seed?

Non-Peer Reviewe

Physiological characteristics of recent Canada western red spring wheat cultivars: nitrogen uptake and remobilization

Non-Peer ReviewedGenetic yield gains have been difficult to achieve within the CWRS wheat class because of stringent quality requirements, and a growing-season environment of low precipitation and high temperatures. Understanding the physiological basis of yield gains may provide breeders with better insight as to the selection of parents, or provide screening tools to identify desirable genotypes. The objective of the present study was to compare four new CWRS wheat cultivars, which averaged higher yields than Neepawa in three years of multi-location testing within registration trials, both as a group and individually while maintaining or even increasing protein content, with two older cultivars, Neepawa and Marquis, in terms of N uptake and N remobilization. Results indicated that new cultivars had higher N uptake and/or higher N remobilization than old cultivars. Low tissue N concentration at maturity could be a criterion for selecting high-yielding and high-protein cultivars.Grain protein concentration (GPC) is an important trait of major interest in breeding of bread wheat (T. aestivum L.), because it determines both baking and nutritional properties. Breeding for both high yield and high GPC is very difficult as a negative relationship between yield and GPC was found by many studies (Simmonds 1995; McNeal, et al., 1972; Whitehouse, 1973; Bhatia, 1975; Costa and Kronstad, 1994). Simmonds (1996), therefore, concluded that high yield and high GPC were unattainable simultaneously. However, Kibite and Evans (1984) indicated that the negative relationship between yield and GPC was not primarily driven by genetic factors, but mainly by environmental factors. Cox et al. (1985) found that negative correlations between yield and GPC for some wheat lines were low, although significant, which indicated that simultaneous increase in yield and GPC could be achieved by selection. This is supported by some studies (Davis et al., 1961; Terman et al. 1969; Johnson, 1978; McKendry et al. 1995). Jenner et al. (1991) indicated there is no fundamental conflict on physiological grounds in selecting cultivars for high carbohydrate yield at acceptable, even high, levels of GPC. GPC is determined by plant total nitrogen (N) uptake and N remobilization to the grain. Many studies found genetic differences in N uptake (Löffler, et al. 1985; Van Sanford and MacKown, 1986; Le et al. 2000; Desai and Bhatia, 1978; McKendry, et al. 1995), while Oscarson et al. (1995) did not find any major differences in NO3 uptake capacity among wheat grown hydroponically. A positive correlation between N uptake and GPC was found by Beninati and Busch (1992) and McKendry et al. (1995), but not by others (McNeal et al. 1966; Johnson et al. 1967; Desai and Bhatia 1978). Cultivar difference in N remobilization was also found by some authors (Seth et al. 1960; Johnson et al. 1968; Van Sanford and MacKown, 1987). However, the relationship between plant N metabolism and GPC was not clear. Some reported that N partitioning was associated with GPC (Johnson et al. 1968; Cox et al. 1986; McKendry et al. 1995), but others (McNeal et al. 1972; Woodruff 1972; Van Sanford and MacKown 1987; May et al. 1991) did not support this. Nitrogen harvest index was (grain N at maturity/maximum N uptake, %) used as a selection criterion by some authors (Desai and Bhatia 1978; Cregan and Berkum 1984; Löffler et al. 1985; Jenner et al. 1991; McKendry et al. 1995). Borghi et al. (1987) suggested that both higher biomass yield and efficiency of N remobilization are important traits to overcome the negative relationship between grain yield and GPC. Some studies suggested to use tissue N (Rostami and Giriaei 1998; Rostami and O'Brien 1996; Sylvester-Bradley 1990) or tissue protein concentrations (Noaman and Taylor 1990; Noaman et al. 1990) as selection criteria for increasing GPC because they were positively correlated with GPC. However, Jenner et al. (1991) indicated that from a physiological point of view, there is little logic in using grain protein percentage as a selection criterion. Delzer et al. (1995) also pointed that selection for grain protein only is questionable because the higher GPC is often associated with lower grain yield. Although there are not short of studies on N mechanisms, there are lack of consistencies in the results. Clarke et al. (1990) indicated that unless greater variation in N utilization parameters among cultivars can be demonstrated, there seems to be little justification for selection for parameters other than grain yield and protein concentration. Some recently developed bread wheat cultivars in western Canada have significantly increased yields, while maintaining or increasing percent protein content, relative to earlier cultivars (Wang et al. 2002). These cultivars can be used to study the physiological basis for these genetic improvements in N utilization. A better understanding of these improvements may allow breeders to design more efficient screening methods to develop future high yield and high GPC cultivars. This information may also assist agronomists and producers design soil and crop management practices that will permit full expression of these improved traits. The objective of this study was to estimate the characteristics of these new cultivars in N utilization in comparison with older cultivars and to identify potential criteria for selection of high yield and high GPC cultivars in the western Canadian semiarid prairie

Durum – mechanisms of yield and grain protein improvements

Non-Peer Reviewe

Growth characteristics, yield components, water, and nutrient use of four spring wheat cultivars

Non-Peer Reviewe

Genotype difference in kernel discolorations in CWRS and CWAD wheats

Non-Peer ReviewedKernel discolorations of wheat, such as black point (including smudge and penetrated smudge), red smudge and Fusarium-damaged kernel (FDK), are important downgrading factors in western Canada. This study was undertaken to determine cultivar differences in incidences of these kernel discolorations and their downgrading effects in CWRS and CWAD wheats. Grain samples were taken at maturity from six CWRS and four CWAD cultivars in a four-year (1997-2000) field study at six sites: one in the Grey soil zone, two in the Brown soil zone and three in the Black soil zone in western Canada. For CWRS cultivars, Garnet tended to have lower incidences in black point, smudge and FDK and resulted in the least downgrading compared with other CWRS cultivars. For CWAD cultivars, Kyle tended to have lower incidence of black point, Plenty had less smudge caused downgrading effects, DT 369 had lower penetrated smudge incidence, but higher red smudge incidence, and Plenty tended to have severer FDK-caused downgrading effects compared with other CWAD cultivars. CWAD class had higher frequency of downgrading than CWRS class and it usually had higher incidences of all kernel discolorations (black point, smudge, penetrated smudge, red smudge and FDK) and greater downgrading effects than CWRS class