Tacrolimus analysis: A comparison of different methods and matrices

We determined the trough blood and plasma concentrations of tacrolimus from the day of transplantation through 30 days posttransplantation in four liver and four kidney transplant patients by three different methods. The first method involved a solid phase extraction of the blood or plasma using Sep-Pak columns (SPs) followed by quantitation of tacrolimus using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); the second method involved a liquid-liquid extraction using methylene chloride (MC) followed by quantitation of tacrolimus using the ELISA, and the third method involved a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractionation of the extract obtained from the solid-phase extraction and quantitation of tacrolimus in the fractions by ELISA. The trough plasma tacrolimus concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 5.2 ng/ml. While the trough plasma concentrations of tacrolimus were similar and independent of the method of analysis in kidney transplant patients and in liver transplant patients with normal biochemical profile, in patients with liver dysfunction, tacrolimus plasma concentrations were higher when measured by SP-ELISA and MC-ELISA methods as compared to the HPLC-ELISA method. In plasma samples obtained from liver transplant patients with liver dysfunction, the presence of some metabolites that cross-reacted with the antibody used in the ELISA could be documented in the HPLC fraction corresponding to the metabolites. This indicates that while tacrolimus metabolites that cross-react significantly with the antibody used in the ELISA do not accumulate in kidney transplant patients, they can appear in the plasma of patients with liver dysfunction. The trough blood tacrolimus concentrations in patients were significantly higher than the corresponding plasma concentrations and ranged from 1.4 to 107 ng/ml. The trough blood tacrolimus concentrations were similar and independent of the method of analysis in kidney and liver transplant patients, suggesting unchanged tacrolimus to be the major component in the blood. The HPLC fractions corresponding to the metabolites of tacrolimus did not contain any components that cross-reacted with the antibody used. This study documents that the methods used in this study for the analysis of blood concentrations of tacrolimus appear to be specific for the parent tacrolimus and can be used in future pharmacokinetic and clinical studies. © 1995 Raven Press, Ltd., New York

The effect of graft function on FK506 plasma levels, dosages, and renal function, with particular reference to the liver

Plasma FK506 was studied in 49 liver, 13 heart, 3 double-lung or heart-lung, and 21 kidney recipients. The levels were correlated with the drug doses used, kidney function, and liver function. In all varieties of recipients, there was an early rise in the FK506 plasma levels that occurred at the time of intravenous administration of the drug. At the same time or shortly after, there were increases in serum creatinine that were transitory except in liver recipients with continuing suboptimal graft function. The quality of hepatic function dominated all aspects of FK506 management in the liver recipients. Those who received well-functioning grafts could be given about the same drug doses as recipients of kidneys and the thoracic organs. Liver recipients with defective grafts had astronomical rises in plasma FK506, a high incidence of renal failure, and probably increased neurotoxicity. In kidney transplant recipients, the FK506 plasma levels and doses were essentially the same in patients with prompt versus delayed renal function. These studies have highlighted the necessity, first, of close pharmacologic monitoring of patients who are given FK506 in the presence of abnormal liver function, and second, of using smaller intravenous induction doses than in past practice. © 1991 by Williams & Wilkins