20 research outputs found

    Impact of Patient Safety Bundle for Management of Morbidly Adherent Placenta on Estimated Blood Loss

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Establishment of centers of excellence for care of patients with morbidly adherent placentas (MAP) has been described to improve patient outcomes. We compared maternal estimated blood loss (EBL) for patients with MAP delivered before and after the implementation of a protocol for management of MAP. Objective: To assess the impact of a new protocol for management of MAP. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of patients at TJUH who had a MAP between 2007 and 2018. In 2015 our center developed a protocol as a patient safety bundle for the management of MAP. Pre-protocol and post-protocol groups were compared. Demographic and operative data were collected. Maternal outcomes were collected and compared using Chi-squared and Fisher-exact test. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney test. The primary outcome was EBL during cesarean hysterectomy. Results: Forty-one of MAP were analyzed. Cesarean hysterectomy was performed for all patients. There were significantly more suspected MAP cases in the post-protocol period (31.8% vs 89.5%,p \u3c0.0001). The post-protocol group was more likely to have a placenta previa, and receive betamethasone prior to delivery. Practice patterns that changed with the bundle included Cell Saver ® , vertical skin incision, fundal hysterotomy, and co-management with gynecologic oncology. EBL was lower in the post-protocol group (pre-protocol: 2600 [1262, 4500] vs post-protocol: 1200 [900, 2250], p=0.04). Massive transfusion was not necessary post-protocol. Discussion: Implementation of a patient safety bundle for MAP demonstrated a lower EBL and more consistent management practices, improving patient safety

    Vaginal Preparation with Povidone Iodine prior to Cesarean Delivery

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To reduce the rate of postoperative endometritis in patients undergoing cesarean delivery by implementing a new departmental guideline for vaginal preparation prior to cesarean sections, after labor or rupture of membraneshttps://jdc.jefferson.edu/patientsafetyposters/1053/thumbnail.jp

    Progestogens in singleton gestations with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE DATA: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes occurs in 3% of all pregnancies. Neonatal benefit is seen in uninfected women who do not deliver immediately after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the administration of progestogens in singleton pregnancies prolongs pregnancy after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. STUDY: Searches were performed in MEDLINE, OVID, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with the use of a combination of keywords and text words related to "progesterone," "progestogen," "prematurity," and "preterm premature rupture of membranes" from the inception of the databases until January 2018. We included all randomized controlled trials of singleton gestations after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes that were randomized to either progestogens or control (either placebo or no treatment). Exclusion criteria were trials that included women who had contraindications to expectant management after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (ie, chorioamnionitis, severe preeclampsia, and nonreassuring fetal status) and trials on multiple gestations. We planned to include all progestogens, including but not limited to 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate, and natural progesterone. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The primary outcome was latency from randomization to delivery. Metaanalysis was performed with the use of the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to produce relative risk with 95% confidence interval. Analysis was performed for each mode of progestogen administration separately. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (n=545 participants) were included. Four of the included trials assessed the efficacy of 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate; 1 trial assessed rectal progestogen, and 1 trial had 3 arms that compared 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate, rectal progestogen, and placebo. The mean gestational age at time randomization was 26.9 weeks in the 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate group and 27.3 weeks in the control group. 17-α Hydroxyprogesterone caproate administration was not found to prolong the latency period between randomization and delivery (mean difference, 0.11 days; 95% confidence interval, -3.30 to 3.53). There were no differences in mean gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, or maternal or neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups. Similarly, there was no difference in latency for those women who received rectal progesterone (mean difference, 4.00 days; 95% confidence interval, -0.72 to 8.72). CONCLUSION: Progestogen administration does not prolong pregnancy in singleton gestations with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

    Induction of labor at full-term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: The lowest incidence of perinatal morbidity and mortality occurs around 39-40 weeks. Therefore, some have advocated induction of uncomplicated singleton gestations once they reach full-term. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of cesarean delivery, and any maternal and perinatal effects of a policy of induction of labor in women with full-term uncomplicated singleton gestations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed an electronic search from inception of each database to August 2018. All results were then limited to randomized trial. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials of asymptomatic women with uncomplicated, singleton gestations at full-term (ie, between 39+0 and 40+6 weeks) who were randomized to either planned induction of labor or control (ie, expectant management). Only trials on asymptomatic singleton gestations without premature rupture of membranes or any other indications for induction evaluating the effectiveness of planned induction of labor in full-term singleton gestations were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Seven randomized clinical trials, including 7598 participants were analyzed. Three studies enrolled only women with favorable cervix, defined as a Bishop score of ≥5 in nulliparous women or ≥4 in multiparous women. One trial included only women aged 35 years or older. Women randomized to the planned induction of labor, received scheduled induction usually at 39+0 to 39+6 weeks of gestation, whereas women in the control group received expectant management usually until 41-42 weeks of gestation, or earlier if medically indicated. Methods of induction usually included cervical ripening, with either misoprostol or Foley catheter, in conjunction with or followed by oxytocin for women with unfavorable cervix, and oxytocin and artificial rupture of membranes for those with favorable cervix. Five trials also used artificial rupture of membranes as a method for induction. Uncomplicated full-term singleton gestations that were randomized to receive induction of labor had similar incidence of cesarean delivery compared with controls (18.6% vs 21.4%; relative risk 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.19). Regarding neonatal outcomes, induction of labor at full-term was associated with a significantly lower rate of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (4.0% vs 13.5%; relative risk 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.57), and lower mean birthweight (mean difference -98.96 g, 95% CI -126.29 to -71.63) compared with the control group. There were no between-group differences in other adverse neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of labor at about 39 weeks is not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery

    Stepwise Implementation of Vaginal Cleansing and Azithromycin at Cesarean Delivery to Decrease Postoperative Infections; A Quality Improvement Study

    Get PDF
    Aims for Improvement We aimed to decrease our SSI rate by 30% by sequential implementation of vaginal cleaning1,2 and azithromycin3 for women who underwent a CD after having labored or experienced rupture of membranes

    Dextrose intravenous fluid therapy in labor reduces the length of the first stage of labor

    Get PDF
    The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect on length of labor when patients receive IVF with or without dextrose. Searches were performed in electronic databases from inception of each database to May 2018. Trials comparing intrapartum IVF containing dextrose (i.e. intervention group) with no dextrose or placebo (i.e. control group) were included. Only trials examining low-risk pregnancies in labor at ≥36 weeks were included. Studies were included regardless of oral intake restriction. The primary outcome was the length of total labor from randomization to delivery. The meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. Sixteen trials (n = 2503 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Women randomized in the IVF dextrose group did not have a statistically significant different length of total labor from randomization to delivery compared to IVF without dextrose (MD -38.33 min, 95% CI -88.23 to 11.57). IVF with dextrose decreased the length of the first stage (MD -75.81 min, 95% CI -120.67 to -30.95), but there was no change in the second stage. In summary, use of IVF with dextrose during labor in low-risk women at term does not affect total length of labor, but it does shorten the first stage of labor

    Interventions to reduce post-cesarean infections; a quality improvement study

    No full text
    Outline Background Methods Results Limitations Conclusion

    39 Weeks Induction of Labor

    No full text

    The Effect of Transvaginal Ultrasound, Vaginal Examination, or Coitus on Fetal Fibronectin Results: A Systematic Review

    Get PDF
    Cervical manipulation via transvaginal ultrasound or sterile vaginal examination does not significantly affect fetal fibronectin results; therefore its use after these exposures is clinically acceptable. Conversely, fFN use in the setting of recent coitus should continue to be discouraged.https://jdc.jefferson.edu/obgynposters/1011/thumbnail.jp
    corecore