Mitigating Emissions Associated With the Production of Traded Goods

The environmental impact of international trade is a concerning issue in the fight against climate change. Trade liberalization—combined with globally fragmented environmental policies—is often associated with the formation of pollution havens. This is because trade enables emissions leakages, which is defined as the outsourcing of emissions-intensive production to countries with weaker environmental regulations. Therefore, literature on this subject has suggested that a globally coordinated policy response is necessary to mitigate the impact of trade on climate change (Aichele & Felbermayr, 2012; Ben-David et al., 2020; Felbmermayr & Peterson, 2020). However, some studies have found that unilateral policy actions have no tangible effect on the volume of emissions associated with trade and, in some cases, the reduction of emissions volume associated with trade (Baylis et al., 2014; Kumar & Prabkahar, 2016; Hoekstra et al., 2016). This policy brief aims to provide insights on unilateral or multilateral actions countries can take to mitigate the impact of embodied emissions associated with the production of traded goods

Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows

The environmental impact of international trade is a concerning issue in the fight against climate change. Trade liberalization—combined with globally fragmented environmental policies—is often associated with emissions leakages and the formation of pollution havens because trade allows countries to outsource emissions-intensive production to countries with weaker environmental regulations. Literature on this subject has therefore suggested that a globally coordinated policy response is necessary to mitigate the impact of trade on climate change. This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by identifying unilateral and multilateral actions countries can take to mitigate the impact of embodied emissions associated with bilateral trade. Through a gravity model estimating the impact of regulation, domestic carbon intensities, and several other gravity variables, this study is able to provide novel conclusions in the context of the existing literature. Particularly, a unilateral strengthening of environmental regulation by the importing country can contribute to climate change mitigation in the best case, and has a statistically insignificant effect in the worst case. This study also finds that multilateral coordination in technological diffusion and trading agreements can also aid in mitigation efforts