Prevalence and influence on outcome of HER2/neu, HER3 and NRG1 expression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Our aim was to explore the impact of the HER2/neu, HER3 receptor as well as their ligands' neuregulin (NRG1) expression on the outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). NRG1, HER2/neu and HER3 expression was evaluated in 208 patients with mCRC receiving 5-FU/LV plus irinotecan or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as the first-line treatment. Biomarker expression was correlated with the outcome of patients. NRG1 (low: 192 vs. high: 16), HER2/neu (low: 201 vs. high: 7) and HER3 (low: 69 vs. high: 139) expressions were assessed in 208 patients. High versus low NRG1 expression significantly affected progression-free survival (PFS) 4.7 vs. 8.2 months, hazard ratio (HR): 2.45; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 1.45-4.13; P=0.001, but not overall survival (OS) (15.5 vs. 20.7 months, HR: 1.33; 95{\%} CI: 0.76-2.35; P=0.32). High versus low HER3 expression (PFS: 7.1 vs. 8.8 months, HR: 1.11; 95{\%} CI: 0.82-1.50; P=0.50; OS: 19.8 vs. 21.1 months, HR: 0.95; 95{\%} CI: 0.70-1.30; P=0.75) and high compared with low HER2/neu expression (PFS: 7.7 vs. 8.0 months, HR: 1.07; 95{\%} CI: 0.71-1.60; P=0.75; OS: 16.6 vs. 21.1 months, HR: 1.13; 95{\%} CI: 0.75-1.71; P=0.57) did not influence outcome. High NRG1 expression was associated with inferior PFS in the FIRE-1 trial. We did not detect a prognostic impact of HER2/neu and HER3 overexpression in mCRC. The frequency of overexpression was comparable with other studies

Neuroendocrine Neoplasia within the German NET Registry

Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NEN) comprise a rare tumor entity with heterogeneous biology, prognosis and therapeutic options. Together with the recent publication of the first German guidelines on diagnostics and therapy of NEN, an analysis of the German NET-registry cohort of the German Society of Endocrinology (DGE) was performed. For this purpose, 2686 cases were extracted and their patient characteristics (e. g., age, sex, histopathological characterization, grading and staging) were displayed and outcomes were calculated. Additionally, the systemic treatment reality in the two largest subgroups, small intestinal and pancreatic NEN, was analyzed within metastatic patients. Distribution of primary tumor localization, histopathological classification, disease stage and overall survival was comparable with results from international registry studies. In concordance with current guidelines, somatostatin analogues (SSA) and peptide-receptor-radionuclide-therapy (PRRT) were the most common therapeutic modalities in small intestinal NEN. In pancreatic NEN, chemotherapy was used in first line as often as SSA. In second line, chemotherapy was used as often as PRRT. WHO-classification of 2010 and TNM staging proved to be of prognostic relevance. The current analysis of the German NET-registry characterizes a multicentric, interdisciplinary cohort of NEN patients throughout Germany and it describes the applied systemic treatment modalities and overall outcome as well as the prognostic value of the WHO classification of 2010 and TNM staging

Treatment Approaches and Outcome of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasia Grade 3 in German Real-World Clinical Practice

Simple Summary Grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN G3) are a rare and heterogeneous subtype of NEN and include poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors G3 (NET G3). Standard chemotherapy with platinum plus etoposide may not be appropriate for all subgroups, but more tailored approaches suffer from the lack of data. In our study, we provide real-world data from a large center-based cohort of the German NET Registry and hope to stimulate efforts to conduct clinical trials for well-defined entities. Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasia grade 3 (NEN G3) represents a rare and heterogeneous cancer type with a poor prognosis. The aim of our study was to analyze real-world data from the German NET Registry with a focus on therapeutic and prognostic aspects. Methods: NEN G3 patients were identified within the German NET Registry. Demographic data and data on treatments and outcomes were retrieved. Univariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier-method. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Of 445 included patients, 318 (71.5%) were diagnosed at stage IV. Well-differentiated morphology (NET G3) was described in 31.7%, 60% of cases were classified as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), and the median Ki67 value was 50%. First-line treatment comprised chemotherapy in 43.8%, with differences in the choice of regimen with regard to NET or NEC, and surgery in 41.6% of patients. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 31 months. Stage, performance status and Ki67 were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The survival data of our national registry compare favorably to population-based data, probably mainly because of a relatively low median Ki67 of 50%. Nevertheless, the best first- and second-line approaches for specific subgroups remain unclear, and an international effort to fill these gaps is needed