Unilateral congenital elongation of the cervical part of the internal carotid artery with kinking and looping: two case reports and review of the literature

Unilateral and bilateral variation in the course and elongation of the cervical (extracranial) part of the internal carotid artery (ICA) leading to its tortuosity, kinking and coiling or looping is not a rare condition, which could be caused by both embryological and acquired factors. Patients with such variations may be asymptomatic in some cases; in others, they can develop cerebrovascular symptoms due to carotid stenosis affecting cerebral circulation. The risk of transient ischemic attacks in patients with carotid stenosis is high and its surgical correction is indicated for the prevention of ischemic stroke. Detection of developmental variations of the ICA and evaluation of its stenotic areas is very important for surgical interventions and involves specific diagnostic imaging techniques for vascular lesions including contrast arteriography, duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography. Examination of obtained images in cases of unusual and complicated variations of vascular pattern of the ICA may lead to confusion in interpretation of data. Awareness about details and topographic anatomy of variations of the ICA may serve as a useful guide for both radiologists and vascular surgeons. It may help to prevent diagnostic errors, influence surgical tactics and interventional procedures and avoid complications during the head and neck surgery. Our present study was conducted with a purpose of updating data about developmental variations of the ICA. Dissections of the main neurovascular bundle of the head and neck were performed on a total 14 human adult cadavers (10 – Africans: 7 males & 3 females and 4 – East Indians: all males). Two cases of unilateral congenital elongation of the cervical part of the ICA with kinking and looping and carotid stenoses were found only in African males. Here we present their detailed case reports with review of the literature

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a review

BackgroundThe success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in providing patient benefits in the immediate postoperative period has led to laparoscopic techniques being used for many other intra-abdominal procedures. Colorectal resection for malignancy is one of the more contentious applications of this new technology, because the postoperative benefits are more subtle and the long-term onco logical results are as yet unknown.MethodsA review of the English-language literature was undertaken in order to collate and analyse all published series where 20 or more laparoscopic colectomies were performed. and where the indication for resection in the majority of cases was adenocarcinoma of the colon.ResultsLaparoscopic colectomy for cancer can be performed safely by experienced surgeons, although there is a considerable learning curve for the procedure. The expected benefits of minimal access surgery are provided by laparoscopic colectomy, although to a lesser extent than that seen with other procedures. The oncological safety of the procedure is as yet unproven. It is clear that an equivalent resection can be performed, but not whether this translates to an equivalent recurrence and survival rate. Reports of isolated port site recurrences are of concern.ConclusionsEarly results of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer are encouraging, although the fate of this procedure rests with the analysis of the large multicentre prospective randomized trials currently under way, particularly with regard to the long-term recurrence and survival rates.Andrew Luck, Chris Hensman and Peter Hewet