90 research outputs found
Self‐reported drug allergy in a general adult Portuguese population
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Oct;34(10):1597-601.
Self-reported drug allergy in a general adult Portuguese population.
Gomes E, Cardoso MF, Praça F, Gomes L, Mariño E, Demoly P.
Serviço de Imunoalergologia, Hospital Maria Pia, Porto, Portugal. [email protected]
Abstract
AIM: To estimate the prevalence of self-reported drug allergy in adults.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a general adult population from Porto (all of whom were living with children involved in the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood-phase three), during the year 2002, using a self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported drug allergy was 7.8% (181/2309): 4.5% to penicillins or other beta-lactams, 1.9% to aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and 1.5% to other drugs. In the group 'allergic to beta-lactams', the most frequently implicated drug was penicillin G or V (76.2%) followed by the association of amoxicillin and clavulanic acids (14.3%). In the group 'allergic to NSAIDs', acetylsalicylic acid (18.2%) and ibuprofen (18.2%) were the most frequently identified drugs, followed by nimesulide and meloxicam. Identification of the exact name of the involved drug was possible in less than one-third of the patients, more often within the NSAID group (59.5%). Women were significantly more likely to claim a drug allergy than men (10.2% vs. 5.3%). The most common manifestations were cutaneous (63.5%), followed by cardiovascular symptoms (35.9%). Most of the reactions were immediate, occurring on the first day of treatment (78.5%). Only half of the patients were submitted to drug allergy investigations. The majority (86.8%) completely avoided the suspected culprit drug thereafter.
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that self-reported allergy to drugs is highly prevalent and poorly explored. Women seem to be more susceptible. beta-lactams and NSAIDs are the most frequently concerned drugs.
PMID: 15479276 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to cephalosporins: Cross-reactivity and tolerability of alternative cephalosporins
BACKGROUND:
Studies regarding the cross-reactivity and tolerability of alternative cephalosporins in large samples of subjects with an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to cephalosporins are lacking.
OBJECTIVE:
We sought to evaluate the possibility of using alternative cephalosporins in subjects with cephalosporin allergy who especially require them.
METHODS:
One hundred two subjects with immediate reactions to cephalosporins and positive skin test results to the responsible drugs underwent serum specific IgE assays with cefaclor and skin tests with different cephalosporins. Subjects were classified in 4 groups: group A, positive responses to 1 or more of ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, cefepime, cefodizime, and ceftazidime; group B, positive responses to aminocephalosporins; group C, positive responses to cephalosporins other than those belonging to the aforementioned groups; and group D, positive responses to cephalosporins belonging to 2 different groups. Group A subjects underwent challenges with cefaclor, cefazolin, and ceftibuten; group B participants underwent challenges with cefuroxime axetil, ceftriaxone, cefazolin, and ceftibuten; and group C and D subjects underwent challenges with some of the aforementioned cephalosporins selected on the basis of their patterns of positivity.
RESULTS:
There were 73 subjects in group A, 13 in group B, 7 in group C, and 9 in group D. Challenges with alternative cephalosporins (ceftibuten in 101, cefazolin in 96, cefaclor in 82, and cefuroxime axetil and ceftriaxone in 22 subjects) were well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS:
Cephalosporin hypersensitivity does not seem to be a class hypersensitivity. Subjects with cephalosporin allergy who especially require alternative cephalosporins might be treated with compounds that have side-chain determinants different from those of the responsible cephalosporins and have negative pretreatment skin test responses
La gestione delle risorse umane in Italia : bilancio di un decennio
Le ricerche internazionali pi\uf9
recenti sottolineano che, nella
gestione delle risorse umane, le
imprese si stanno spostando da
modelli in cui le persone sono
considerate un costo da minimizzare
verso modelli caratterizzati
da una gestione integrata nel
business, all\u2019interno della quale le
persone sono ritenute strategiche
per il conseguimento di un vantaggio
competitivo durevole per
l\u2019impresa.
Il presente contributo si basa su
una survey condotta nel 2009
sulla Direzione delle Risorse
Umane di 102 imprese operanti in
Italia, utilizzando lo stesso strumento
di raccolta dati utilizzato
in una survey simile condotta nel
1999.
Sulla base dei dati emergenti l\u2019articolo
raggiunge due risultati: presenta
un\u2019analisi longitudinale
sulla gestione delle risorse umane
in Italia, confrontando le evidenze
del 1999 con quelle del 2009;
ed analizza in che misura le politiche
di gestione delle risorse
umane dichiarate sono coerenti
con le pratiche effettivamente
implementate, anche qui offendo
un raffronto a distanza di dieci
anni
Human Resource Management: evoluzione o involuzione?
QUESTO ARTICOLO INDAGA IN CHE MISURA LE DIREZIONI
DELLE RISORSE UMANE OPERANTI IN ITALIA ABBIANO FATTO
PROPRI, NELLA PROSPETTIVA DELLO HUMAN RESOURCE MAN -
AGEMENT, I MODELLI ORIENTATI ALLA VALORIZZAZIONE DELLE
RISORSE UMANE O QUELLI CHE ENFATIZZANO LA COERENZA
TRA GESTIONE DELLE RISORSE UMANE E STRATEGIE DELL\u2019ORGANIZZAZIONE.
NELLA PRIMA SEZIONE SI ESPONGONO I PRESUPPOSTI TEORICI
DELLA RICERCA; LA SECONDA SEZIONE PRESENTA GLI OBIETTIVI
SPECIFICI DELLA RICERCA E LA METODOLOGIA USATA PER
LA RACCOLTA E L\u2019ANALISI DEI DATI; I RISULTATI SONO ILLUSTRATI
ALL\u2019INTERNO DELLA TERZA SEZIONE DEL DOCUMENTO.
L\u2019ARTICOLO SI CHIUDE CON LA DISCUSSIONE DEI RISULTATI, IN
CUI SI EVIDENZIANO ALCUNI ELEMENTI CRITICI CHE IL CONTESTO
ITALIANO REGISTRA IN MERITO AL PASSAGGIO A UNA PROSPETTIVA
DI HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
- …