11 research outputs found
Modern Techniques for Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy
Cervical cancer is a socially significant illness often impacting women of reproductive and working age. The patientsβ young age and social activity warrant the development of effective and safe therapies.The past decades have witnessed the novel radiation techniques to contain cervical cancer: 3DCRT-3D, IMRT, and VMAT, adaptive radiotherapy, CT/MRI-guided intracavitary radiation, combined interstitial and intracavitary radiation, abandoning intracavitary intervention for external beam delivery with sequential or concurrent cervical dose escalation, under brachytherapy unfeasible.Modern equipment and treatment planning systems allow a high dose delivery to the tumour and intracavitary treatment with visual control of the target and organs at risk. Combining of intracavitary and interstitial radiotherapy enables a better dose coverage of the target at a minimal radiation impact on organs at risk.Phasing-out of intracavitary for external radiotherapy may enable a cancericide dose delivery to the tumour under intractable intracavitary treatment.The major goal of technic novelties is the establishment of personalised radiotherapy for improving treatment outcomes and reducing the incidence and/or severity of radiation side effects. The article overviews the radiotherapy techniques for cervical cancer treatment and routes of their development
Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ
Cervical cancer is a socially significant illness often impacting women of reproductive and working age. The patientsβ young age and social activity warrant the development of effective and safe therapies.The past decades have witnessed the novel radiation techniques to contain cervical cancer: 3DCRT-3D, IMRT, and VMAT, adaptive radiotherapy, CT/MRI-guided intracavitary radiation, combined interstitial and intracavitary radiation, abandoning intracavitary intervention for external beam delivery with sequential or concurrent cervical dose escalation, under brachytherapy unfeasible.Modern equipment and treatment planning systems allow a high dose delivery to the tumour and intracavitary treatment with visual control of the target and organs at risk. Combining of intracavitary and interstitial radiotherapy enables a better dose coverage of the target at a minimal radiation impact on organs at risk.Phasing-out of intracavitary for external radiotherapy may enable a cancericide dose delivery to the tumour under intractable intracavitary treatment.The major goal of technic novelties is the establishment of personalised radiotherapy for improving treatment outcomes and reducing the incidence and/or severity of radiation side effects. The article overviews the radiotherapy techniques for cervical cancer treatment and routes of their development.Π Π°ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π΅Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.ΠΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ: Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 3DCRT-3D, IMRT ΠΈ VMAT, Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ, ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΠ’/ΠΠ Π’-ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ° Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ.Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ Π½Π° ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°. ΠΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ
Π²Π°ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ· Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.ΠΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ° Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π΄Π°ΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ ΠΊ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ. Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ
U/Pb Age of detrital zircons from sandstones of the upper emsian diamond takaty formation of the Western Urals
The first results of U/Pb (LA-ICP-MS) dating of detrital zircons from quartz sandstones of the Devonian Takaty Formation are presented. The obtained ages span a range from 1857.5 Β± 53.8 to 3054.0 Β± Β± 48.0 Ma. The vast Β«gapΒ» (~1.5 Ga) between sedimentary age of Takaty Formation and the age of the youngest zircon grain is fixed. A comparison of known ages of crystalline complexes from the Volga-Uralian part of East-European Platform with obtained ages of detrital zircons from Takaty Formation supports the Β«Volgo-UralianΒ» origin of the zircons. This implies the existence of a previously unknown stage of kimberlitic magmatism, much more ancient than the stage of kimberlitic magmatism formed diamonds in Arkhangelsk and Timan provinces
First results of U-Pb dating of detrital zircons from the Upper Ordovician sandstones of the Bashkir uplift (Southern Urals)
The first results of UβPb dating of detrital zircons from Upper Ordovician sandstones of the Bashkir uplift in the Southern Urals and UβPb isotopic ages available for detrital zircons from six stratigraphic levels of the RipheanβPaleozoic section of this region are discussed. It is established that the long (approximately 1.5 Ga) depositional history of sedimentary sequences of the Bashkir uplift includes a peculiar period lasting from the Late Vendian to the Emsian Age of the Early Devonian (0.55β0.41 Ga). This period is characterized by the following features: (1) prevalence of material from eroded Mesoproterozoic and Early Neoproterozoic crystalline complexes among clastics with ages atypical of the VolgaβUrals segment of the East European Platform basement; (2) similarity of age spectra obtained for detrital zircons from different rocks of the period: Upper VendianβLower Cambrian lithic sandstones and Middle Ordovician substantially quartzose sandstones.6 page(s
Some general features of the Western Urals terrigenous deposits formation: Synthesis of U-Pb isotopic age data of detrital zircon and geochemical investigation of the sales and mudstones
The data on U-Pb-isotopic ages of detrital zircons from Riphean-Paleozoic and Early Triassic sandstones and geochemistry of shales and mudstones of the Western Urals are discussed. The ages of detrital zircons suggest that the sand material for sedimentary basins existed at the junction of the East European Platform and Urals during more than one and a half billion years, has been brought mainly from the platform. Tectonogenic sands (according F.J. Pettijohn and co-authors) as a part of the Western Urals sedimentary associations play a significant role only in Vendian and in the last third of the Paleozoic. During the rest of the time was dominated cratonogenic sands. According to clay rocks geochemical characteristics during the time from 1750 to 250 Ma, there are unidirectional trend in the composition of the erosion areas: increasing mafic and ultramafic igneous rocks which reached to maximum in Early Permian time