Gender-related differences in infrarenal aortic aneurysm morphologic features: Issues relevant to Ancure and Talent endografts

AbstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether gender-related anatomic variables may reduce applicability of aortic endografting in women. Methods: Data on all patients evaluated at our institution for endovascular repair of their abdominal aortic aneurysm were collected prospectively. Ancure (Endovascular Technologies (EVT)/Guidant Corporation, Menlo Park, Calif) and Talent (World Medical/Medtronic Corporation, Sunrise, Fla) endografts were used. Preoperative imaging included contrast-enhanced computed tomography and arteriography or magnetic resonance angiography. Results: One hundred forty-one patients were evaluated (April 1998–December 1999), 19 women (13.5%) and 122 men (86.5%). Unsuitable anatomy resulted in rejection of 63.2% of the women versus only 33.6% of the men (P = .026). Maximum aneurysm diameter in women and men were similar (women, 56.94 ± 8.23 mm; men, 59.29 ± 13.22 mm; P = .5). The incidence of iliac artery tortuosity was similar across gender (women, 36.8%; men, 54.9%; P = .2). The narrowest diameter of the larger external iliac artery in women was significantly smaller (7.29 ± 2.37 mm) than in men (8.62 ± 2.07 mm; P = .02). The proximal neck length was significantly shorter in women (10.79 ± 12.5 mm) than in men (20.47 ± 19.5 mm; P = .02). The proximal neck width was significantly wider in women (30.5 ± 2.4 mm) than in men (27.5 ± 2.5 mm; P = .013). Proximal neck angulation (>60 degrees) was seen in a significantly higher proportion of women (21%) than men (3.3%; P = .012). Of the patients accepted for endografting, a significantly higher proportion of women required an iliofemoral conduit for access (women, 28.6%; men, 1.2%; P = .016). Conclusion: Gender-related differences in infrarenal aortic aneurysm morphologic features may preclude widespread applicability of aortic endografting in women, as seen by our experience with the Ancure and Talent devices. In addition to a significantly reduced iliac artery size, women are more likely to have a shorter, more dilated, more angulated proximal aortic neck. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:S77-84.

Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms : Critical events and adjunctive procedures

AbstractObjective: We sought to define the learning curve relative to the incidence and range of intraoperative problems and to establish guidelines for troubleshooting during the endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Methods: We prospectively evaluated our first 75 consecutive cases over a 12-month period and focused on perioperative critical events and adjunctive procedures as categorical outcome measures collected during the operation. Patients were separated into three groups on the basis of the date of their operation, such that group 1 consisted of our first 25 cases, group 2 our next 25 cases, and group 3 our last 25 cases. Results: At least one critical event and adjunctive procedure marked 67 (89%) of 75 cases. In 51%, there were at least two critical events and adjunctive procedures. There were no immediate open conversions or intraoperative deaths. Access problems occurred in 28% of the 75 cases and were addressed by use of brachial-femoral artery access (30%), iliac artery/aortic bifurcation balloon angioplasty (8%), and iliofemoral conduits (4%). Graft foreshortening was the most common deployment event (44%), necessitating distal covered extensions. Iliac graft limb twists and kinks occurred in 12% of cases and were managed with balloon angioplasty and uncovered stents. General incidents included balloon ruptures (10%), arterial dissections (6%), iliac artery rupture (2.6%), and lower extremity ischemia (4%). The two cases of iliac artery rupture were managed with distal covered extensions, and there were no cases of atheroemboli. Intraoperative endoleaks were encountered in 44% of the cases and included proximal attachment sites (15%), distal attachment sites (9%), type 2 sources, and “blushes.” Management of intraoperative endoleaks included proximal/distal covered extensions and re-ballooning. Our 30-day endoleak rate was 20%. The incidence of critical events did not decrease in the latter one third compared with the first two thirds of cases. Conclusions: Critical events occur frequently during endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. The intraoperative problems range from the common endoleaks, access and deployment issues, and balloon ruptures, to rare but life-threatening complications such as iliac artery rupture. A toolbox of accessories that includes wires, catheters, large balloons, covered proximal and distal extensions, and uncovered stents is essential given the frequency of adjunctive procedures. Successful aortic endografting requires more than mere familiarity with basic endovascular techniques. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:1226-32.

Perigraft air, fever, and leukocytosis after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Background: The postimplantation syndrome of fever and leukocytosis after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms has not been previously characterized and its etiology is not known. Methods: We studied the first 12 patients who underwent successful endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms with Dacron-covered stent-grafts, as part of an ongoing phase II clinical trial. Sepsis syndrome evaluations (physical examination, urinalysis, chest radiograph, urine cultures, and blood cultures) were performed for all patients with postoperative temperature (T) greater than 101.4°F. Computed tomography scans of the abdomen were performed, as part of the clinical protocol, on postoperative days 2 and 30. Results: Fever (T >101.4°F) was seen in 8 of 12 (67%) patients ( P <05). An additional 2 of 12 (17%) patients had low-grade fevers (100.3°F, 100.6°F). Only 2 of 12 (17%) patients remained afebrile postoperatively. Leukocytosis with counts over 11,000 white blood cells (WBC) /dL was observed in 7 of 12 (58%) patients ( P <05). Sepsis evaluations failed to identify any source of infection in 11 of 12 (97%) patients. Computed tomograhy scan evidence of perigraft air was noted in 8 of 12 (67%) patients. All patients were afebrile, had normal white blood cell counts, and were discharged within 1 week postoperatively. There has been no evidence of graft infection after 1 to 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Fever and leukocytosis after stent-graft repair of aortic aneurysms does not represent evidence of systemic or graft infection and is not clearly related to nonspecific causes of postoperative fever and leukocytosis. Moreover, the finding of early postoperative perigraft air is not necessarily an indication of graft infection even when concurrently present with fever and leukocytosis

Relationship between preoperative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery and subsequent occurrence of type II endoleak in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

AbstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was (1) to find out whether preoperative inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) patency (on radiographic imaging) predicts IMA-related endoleaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, (2) to determine feasibility of measuring aneurysm sac pressures in patients with endoleaks, and (3) to report early evidence of effective endovascular obliteration of IMA endoleaks. Methods: We studied 76 consecutive cases of infrarenal aortic aneurysms that were repaired with an endovascular approach (March 1998–April 1999). Results: There were 13 (17%) endoleaks persistent 30 days after the procedure. Eleven (85%) of these 13 were IMA-related endoleaks, which were documented with selective superior mesenteric artery angiography. The preoperative finding (on computed tomographic scan) of a patent IMA does not always predict an IMA-related endoleak, but results in a statistically and clinically significant higher ratio of patients with IMA-related endoleaks in the immediate postoperative period (24% versus 3%, P <.035). In eight of the 11 patients with persistent IMA-related endoleaks, measurement of intra-aneurysm sac pressures was possible, and six of these patients had systemic pressures within the excluded aneurysm sac. Nine (82%) of 11 IMA-related endoleaks were successfully obliterated by means of selective IMA embolization. Conclusions: Many endoleaks are caused by a patent IMA, and this can result in persistence of systemic pressure within the aneurysm sac. The preoperative finding (on computed tomographic scan) of a patent IMA is a predictor of increased rates of IMA endoleaks, and IMA endoleaks can be successfully obliterated through endovascular procedures, after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. (J Vasc Surg 2000;32:777-88.

The role of magnetic resonance angiography for endoprosthetic design

AbstractObjectives: Many patients with aortic aneurysms have renal insufficiency and may be at increased risk when conventional imaging modalities (contrast-enhanced computed tomography and arteriography) are used for aortic endograft design. Our objective was to determine if magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) could be used as the sole imaging modality for endoprosthetic design. Methods: A total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular repair of thoracic (5) and abdominal (91) aortic aneurysms (April 1998–December 1999) were included in this study. Data were collected prospectively. Gadolinium-enhanced MRA was used preoperatively in place of conventional imaging if renal insufficiency or a history of severe contrast reaction was present. The control group underwent conventional imaging. Endografts used included Ancure, AneuRx, and Talent. Results: Fourteen patients (14.6%) had their endografts designed solely with MRA. Intraoperative access failure; proximal and distal extensions (unplanned); conversion to open, aborted procedures; and endoleaks occurred with equal frequency in both the MRA-designed and control groups (16.7% vs 18.3%, respectively; P =.33). Despite baseline renal insufficiency, there was no significant rise in the creatinine level after endograft implantation in patients with an MRA design (preoperative level, 1.8; postoperative level, 1.9; P =.5). Conclusion: MRA may be successfully used as the sole modality for aortic endograft design. The use of MRA for this purpose is noninvasive and minimizes nephrotoxic risk. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:488-94.