Parenterally Administered Moderate Sedation and Paracervical Block Versus General Anesthesia for Hysteroscopic Polypectomy: A Pilot Study Comparing Postoperative Outcomes

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare parenterally administered moderate sedation and paracervical block versus general anesthesia during day-case operative hysteroscopy for polypectomy in terms of patients' postoperative pain perception, operating time, and postoperative drug administration. DESIGN: A pilot study (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: Women undergoing hysteroscopic polypectomy procedures (N = 56). INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic polypectomy with general anesthesia or moderate parenteral sedation and paracervical block. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patients were divided into 2 groups: 26 underwent general anesthesia (group 1), and 30 were submitted to moderate parenteral sedation and a paracervical block (group 2). General anesthesia was induced with the laryngeal mask airway with propofol (1% 1-2.5 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1-2 μg/kg) and maintained with an infusion of propofol (2% 3-5 mg/kg/h). After the procedure, patients in the general anesthesia group received postoperative analgesic medication with paracetamol (20 mg/kg) and ketorolac (0.6 mg/kg) or tramadol (2-3 mg/kg). The group receiving moderate parenterally sedation and a paracervical block received a paracervical block with mepivacaine (1% 10 mL) and lidocaine (2% 10 mL) and received fentanyl (1 μg/kg) and propofol (1% 1-3 mg/kg/h) maintaining spontaneous breathing. A blind observer recorded the operative time and the discomfort of patients using a 4-step scale (0-3). The postoperative pain assessment was performed 3 hours after the procedure with a self-administered validated tool, the Brief Pain Inventory. We found that women receiving moderate parenteral sedation and a paracervical block perceived significantly less pain in daily activity (p < .001), walking (p < .001), daily work (p < .001), relations with others (p = .007), sleep (p < .001), and pain contrasting enjoyment of life (p < .001). The total amount of time spent in the operating room in group 2 was significantly lower than in group 1 (p < .014). CONCLUSION: Moderate sedation plus a paracervical block for operative hysteroscopy is associated with reduced pain perception and a shorter operative time

Considerations regarding pain management and anesthesiological aspects in pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery: robotic vs laparoscopic-thoracoscopic approach

In the last decade, the applicability of robotic surgery has been demonstrated in many interventions, expanding the indications of minimally invasive surgery also to pediatrics. The aim of the study is to evaluate postoperative pain to demonstrate better control following robotic procedures compared to thoraco-laparoscopic surgery. An observational, retrospective, multicentre study was performed involving 204 children undergoing robot-assisted surgery and thoraco/laparoscopic surgery at the Istituto Giannina Gaslini in Genoa and the Siena University Hospital (2013-2017): 83 children underwent robotic-assisted surgery and 121 thoracic-laparoscopic surgery. Personal data and type of intervention were assessed, dividing the patients into four categories: thoracic, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary and urological surgeries. We analyzed the anesthetic risk according to ASA classification by type of intervention, the type of anesthesia used, the anesthetic drugs used during surgery and in the postoperative period. Both the problems that occurred during the procedures and the number of interventions converted into open during robotic surgery and laparoscopic thoracic surgery were analyzed. Pain was measured on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day (FLACC or NRS scales). By comparing the two groups (robotics-non-robotics), the analysis shows that postoperative pain does not change with the chosen approach, but always maintains very low values, typical of minimally invasive surgery. The pain score is significantly higher in patients undergoing thoracic surgery, either robotic or thoracoscopic, compared to those undergoing gastrointestinal surgery (P corrected according to Bonferroni: 0.0006) and those undergoing urological intervention (P corrected according to Bonferroni: 0.04). In conclusion, no significant change in the intensity of postoperative pain between the two groups was found, while it is seen that the pain in patients undergoing thoracic interventions (robotic/thoracoscopic) is more intense than that reported for other types of interventions