Variation in sexual dimorphism in a wind-pollinated plant: The influence of geographical context and life-cycle dynamics

* Understanding the mechanisms causing phenotypic differences between females and males has long fascinated evolutionary biologists. An extensive literature exists on animal sexual dimorphism but less information is known about sex differences in plants, particularly the extent of geographical variation in sexual dimorphism and its life‐cycle dynamics. * Here, we investigated patterns of genetically based sexual dimorphism in vegetative and reproductive traits of a wind‐pollinated dioecious plant, Rumex hastatulus, across three life‐cycle stages using open‐pollinated families from 30 populations spanning the geographic range and chromosomal variation (XY and XY1Y2) of the species. * The direction and degree of sexual dimorphism was highly variable among populations and life‐cycle stages. Sex‐specific differences in reproductive function explained a significant amount of temporal change in sexual dimorphism. For several traits, geographical variation in sexual dimorphism was associated with bioclimatic parameters, likely due to the differential responses of the sexes to climate. We found no systematic differences in sexual dimorphism between chromosome races. * Sex‐specific trait differences in dioecious plants largely result from a balance between sexual and natural selection on resource allocation. Our results indicate that abiotic factors associated with geographical context also play a role in modifying sexual dimorphism during the plant life‐cycle

Data from: Sex-specific estimation of cis and trans regulation of gene expression in heads and gonads of Drosophila melanogaster

Datasets of the publication "Sex-specific estimation of cis and trans regulation of gene expression in heads and gonads of Drosophila melanogaster"

ISTA Thesis

Females and males across species are subject to divergent selective pressures arising from di↵erent reproductive interests and ecological niches. This often translates into a intricate array of sex-specific natural and sexual selection on traits that have a shared genetic basis between both sexes, causing a genetic sexual conflict. The resolution of this conflict mostly relies on the evolution of sex-specific expression of the shared genes, leading to phenotypic sexual dimorphism. Such sex-specific gene expression is thought to evolve via modifications of the genetic networks ultimately linked to sex-determining transcription factors. Although much empirical and theoretical evidence supports this standard picture of the molecular basis of sexual conflict resolution, there still are a few open questions regarding the complex array of selective forces driving phenotypic di↵erentiation between the sexes, as well as the molecular mechanisms underlying sexspecific adaptation. I address some of these open questions in my PhD thesis. First, how do patterns of phenotypic sexual dimorphism vary within populations, as a response to the temporal and spatial changes in sex-specific selective forces? To tackle this question, I analyze the patterns of sex-specific phenotypic variation along three life stages and across populations spanning the whole geographical range of Rumex hastatulus, a wind-pollinated angiosperm, in the first Chapter of the thesis. Second, how do gene expression patterns lead to phenotypic dimorphism, and what are the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed transcriptomic variation? I address this question by examining the sex- and tissue-specific expression variation in newly-generated datasets of sex-specific expression in heads and gonads of Drosophila melanogaster. I additionally used two complementary approaches for the study of the genetic basis of sex di↵erences in gene expression in the second and third Chapters of the thesis. Third, how does intersex correlation, thought to be one of the main aspects constraining the ability for the two sexes to decouple, interact with the evolution of sexual dimorphism? I develop models of sex-specific stabilizing selection, mutation and drift to formalize common intuition regarding the patterns of covariation between intersex correlation and sexual dimorphism in the fourth Chapter of the thesis. Alltogether, the work described in this PhD thesis provides useful insights into the links between genetic, transcriptomic and phenotypic layers of sex-specific variation, and contributes to our general understanding of the dynamics of sexual dimorphism evolution

Sex-specific estimation of cis and trans regulation of gene expression in heads and gonads of Drosophila melanogaster

The regulatory architecture of gene expression is known to differ substantially between sexes in Drosophila, but most studies performed so far used whole-body data and only single crosses, which may have limited their scope to detect patterns that are robust across tissues and biological replicates. Here, we use allele-specific gene expression of parental and reciprocal hybrid crosses between 6 Drosophila melanogaster inbred lines to quantify cis- and trans-regulatory variation in heads and gonads of both sexes separately across 3 replicate crosses. Our results suggest that female and male heads, as well as ovaries, have a similar regulatory architecture. On the other hand, testes display more and substantially different cis-regulatory effects, suggesting that sex differences in the regulatory architecture that have been previously observed may largely derive from testis-specific effects. We also examine the difference in cis-regulatory variation of genes across different levels of sex bias in gonads and heads. Consistent with the idea that intersex correlations constrain expression and can lead to sexual antagonism, we find more cis variation in unbiased and moderately biased genes in heads. In ovaries, reduced cis variation is observed for male-biased genes, suggesting that cis variants acting on these genes in males do not lead to changes in ovary expression. Finally, we examine the dominance patterns of gene expression and find that sex- and tissue-specific patterns of inheritance as well as trans-regulatory variation are highly variable across biological crosses, although these were performed in highly controlled experimental conditions. This highlights the importance of using various genetic backgrounds to infer generalizable patterns

Pleiotropy modulates the efficacy of selection in drosophila melanogaster

Pleiotropy is the well-established idea that a single mutation affects multiple phenotypes. If a mutation has opposite effects on fitness when expressed in different contexts, then genetic conflict arises. Pleiotropic conflict is expected to reduce the efficacy of selection by limiting the fixation of beneficial mutations through adaptation, and the removal of deleterious mutations through purifying selection. Although this has been widely discussed, in particular in the context of a putative “gender load,” it has yet to be systematically quantified. In this work, we empirically estimate to which extent different pleiotropic regimes impede the efficacy of selection in Drosophila melanogaster. We use whole-genome polymorphism data from a single African population and divergence data from D. simulans to estimate the fraction of adaptive fixations (α), the rate of adaptation (ωA), and the direction of selection (DoS). After controlling for confounding covariates, we find that the different pleiotropic regimes have a relatively small, but significant, effect on selection efficacy. Specifically, our results suggest that pleiotropic sexual antagonism may restrict the efficacy of selection, but that this conflict can be resolved by limiting the expression of genes to the sex where they are beneficial. Intermediate levels of pleiotropy across tissues and life stages can also lead to maladaptation in D. melanogaster, due to inefficient purifying selection combined with low frequency of mutations that confer a selective advantage. Thus, our study highlights the need to consider the efficacy of selection in the context of antagonistic pleiotropy, and of genetic conflict in general